See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Assisted Living

Bonaventure of Thornton LLC

Limited public data on Bonaventure of Thornton LLC. Call, tour, and ask to meet current residents' families — your own impression matters most.

12281 Washington Center Pkwy, Thornton, CO 8024195 bedsLicensed & Active
Source: CO CDPHE — view official record
Google rating
3.2/5

based on 57 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1
Bonaventure of Thornton LLC Assisted Living in Thornton, CO — Street View
Street View

Watch Bonaventure of Thornton LLC

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

While the facility is physically beautiful and offers a robust social calendar, there are recurring reports of staffing shortages and management issues that impact care quality. We strongly recommend visiting during off-hours or weekends to observe staffing levels firsthand and asking specific questions about how they handle medication management and dietary needs.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

57 reviews on Google
Bonaventure of Thornton is a visually appealing facility that receives high praise for its physical environment and some dedicated, compassionate staff members. However, families frequently report serious concerns regarding inconsistent care quality, high staff turnover, and management responsiveness, particularly within the memory care and assisted living units.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food3.0Staff5.0Clean8.0Activities8.0Meds2.0Memory3.0Comms4.0Value3.0

Strengths

  • Beautiful, clean, and well-maintained facility
  • Compassionate and dedicated individual caregivers
  • Active social calendar and community events
  • Strong initial sales and move-in support

Concerns

  • Understaffing leading to long response times (mentioned by 3 reviewers)
  • Poor management communication and unprofessionalism (mentioned by 4 reviewers)
  • Inconsistent quality and variety of food (mentioned by 4 reviewers)
  • High staff and management turnover (mentioned by 3 reviewers)

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

234'18(7)'20(5)'22(4)'24(14)'26(4)

Distribution · 56 analyzed

5
28
4
4
3
1
2
5
1
18

How They Respond to Reviews

53%response rate

This facility responds to some reviews.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1We've heard great things about how beautiful and clean the facility is; could you show us some of the common areas where residents gather?
  • 2Since we know how important social connection is, could you walk us through what a typical week of community events and activities looks like?
  • 3How do you ensure that medication management is handled accurately and consistently for every resident?
  • 4What is the process for communicating important updates or changes in care between the management team and family members?
  • 5Could you tell us more about the dining experience, specifically regarding the variety of meal options and how the menu is planned?
  • 6In the event of a medical emergency during the night, what specific protocols are in place to ensure a quick response?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

The facility is beautiful and always clean, however the quality of care is concerning. Although the assisted living care staff is caring and friendly, they seem over worked.

Assisted living family member · 2024★★☆☆☆

They don’t adequately train staff to deal with people who have dementia/Alzheimer’s. Management will make rude comments about your loved one.

Memory care family member · 2025☆☆☆☆

The caretakers in the memory care were incredible. They took wonderful care of my mom for more than 2 years. They treated her as a family member.

Memory care family member · 2025★★★★★
Source: 57 Google reviews

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: CO Dept. of Public Health & Environment

10total
4deficiencies
Apr 2, 2026Complaint
N/A0000 & 9999

A revisit survey was completed on 4/2/26 for all previous deficiencies cited on 11/24/25. The facility is in compliance with all deficiencies that were cited. Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally

Apr 2, 2026Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Apr 2, 2026Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Apr 2, 2026Follow-up
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Apr 2, 2026Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Apr 2, 2026Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Nov 24, 2025Follow-up
N/A0000 & 1568

A licensure revisit was completed on 11/24/25, for the previous deficiency cited on 3/12/25. A deficiency was cited. The regulations governing Assisted Living Residences were revised. The new Chapter VII regulations were implemented on 7/1/25. Based on the interview and observation, the residence failed to follow the practitioner' s orders, affecting two of 11 sample residents (#29 and #38). This deficiency was cited previously during a state licensure survey on 3/12/25. Although the facility corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the facility has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement.Findings include:1. Record Review Resident #38 was admitted to the residence on 4/28/22 with a diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis.TylenolA written practitioner' s order, dated 9/17/25, directed the residence to administer two 500 mg tablets by mouth every eight hours. The October 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) read the medication was not administered on 10/25/25 at 2:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m., because it was not available. 2. InterviewsOn 11/24/25 at approximately 4:30 p.m., the administrator stated that she expected that the residence would have the medication available to be administered. She acknowledged that the medication for Resident #38 was not administered because it was not available. The administrator further stated she was unaware why the deficiency had not been corrected. 3. Evidence obtained during the on-site visit revealed that the residence additionally failed to comply with practitioner orders for Resident #29.

Nov 24, 2025Complaint
N/A0000, 0410, 1568 and 2 more

A relicensure survey and complaint revisit was completed on 11/24/25, for all previous deficiences cited on 3/12/25. Deficiences were cited. The regulations governing Assisted Living Residences were revised. The new Chapter VII regulations were implemented on 7/1/25. Based on interview and record review the residence failed to, on a quarterly basis, audit the accuracy and completeness of medication administration records (MARs), affecting 88 current residents.This deficiency was cited previously during a complaint investigation on 3/12/25. Although the residence corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the residence has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement.Findings include:On 11/24/25 at 1:45 p.m., the last three quarterly medication audits were provided. However, the medication cart audits revealed no evidence that the investigations and resolutions of irregularities were marked on the audit. On 11.. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to ensure that the enhanced care plan included a description of how the resident will have continuous independent access to his or her individual room, along with the residence' s plan to protect the resident from unwanted visitation by other residents; Documentation describing the personal grooming and hygiene items that are determined safe for the resident to have in their own possession for self-care, and how those items are stored to prevent unauthorized access by other residents; Documentation describing the resident' s behavioral expressions along with individualized approaches to be implemented by staff to p.. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to report suspected physical abuse to law enforcement within 24 hours of discovery pursuant to Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S.), affecting two of eleven sample residents (#39 and #41).This deficiency was cited previously during a state licensure survey on 4/16/25. Although the facility corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the facility has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement.Findings include:1. References and Policiesa. Chapter VII regulations governing assisted living residences: Part 2.8, defines an "At-risk person" means any person who is 70 years of age or older, or any person who is 18 years .. Based on the interview and observation, the residence failed to follow the practitioner' s orders, affecting two of 11 sample residents (#29 and #38). This deficiency was cited previously during a state licensure survey on 3/12/25. Although the facility corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the facility has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement.Findings include:1. Record Review Resident #38 was admitted to the residence on 4/28/22 with a diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis.TylenolA written practitioner' s order, dated 9/17/25, directed the residence to administer two 500 mg tablets by mouth every eight hours. The October 2025 Medication Administration..

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call