Reviewer concerns include physical neglect including bed sores and bruising (mentioned by 2 reviewers) — investigate before committing.
based on 6 Google reviews

Email Aaspen Villagecare to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Reviewer feedback for Aaspen Villagecare suggests areas to investigate further. Common concerns include: physical neglect including bed sores and bruising (mentioned by 2 reviewers), theft or loss of resident personal belongings. We recommend visiting in person, talking to current residents and their families, and asking specific questions about the concerns identified in reviews.
Families should exercise extreme caution, as recent reviews report severe physical neglect including the development of bed sores and bruises within weeks of admission. While an older review from 2020 noted kind service, more recent reports highlight serious concerns regarding resident safety and the theft of personal belongings.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 14 analyzed
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“My mother was in their care only 19 days and we removed her abruptly because she was covered in bed sores and bruises in just 19 days of being in their “care.””
“When a family member went to retrieve his belongings, many of his things were missing. A guitar, cell phone, and an Alexa among other items. Waiting to see if situation will be resolved. Police Report has been filed.”
“Very kind service, helps you with one of the most difficult times in life when having to place a loved one in others care.”
Source: CA Community Care Licensing Division
The inspection identified several deficiencies across multiple areas, including medication administration, emergency planning, and recordkeeping. There are multiple Type A and Type B citations requiring immediate attention and corrective action by specified due dates. Overall, the facility requires significant follow-up to ensure compliance with safety and operational standards.
The inspection was an informal office meeting held to discuss the facility's operational status, closure procedures, and compliance with Title 22. Two deficiencies were noted, both related to documentation and procedure, specifically concerning unapproved eviction letters and the need to adhere to proper facility closure protocols.
The unannounced visit identified two deficiencies. A Type A deficiency was cited for unsanitary conditions in an empty room, specifically feces on the floor of room #6. Additionally, a Type B deficiency was noted regarding the failure to submit a required closure plan to the department.
This report details an investigation into allegations concerning food service and resident care. The investigation concluded that the allegations were Unfounded, meaning the complaint was found to be false or without reasonable basis.
The facility underwent a required annual inspection. While general areas like passageways, lighting, and basic supplies were found adequate, a significant deficiency was noted regarding the hot water temperature in two resident bathrooms. Overall, the report indicates that no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations, despite the noted technical violation.
The inspection identified three deficiencies, all classified as Type B non-compliance issues. These issues relate to inadequate hot water temperatures in bathrooms, lack of a fully furnished bedroom, and overgrown exterior shrubbery. The facility was advised on plans of correction for all cited violations.
This report details a complaint investigation regarding alleged neglect of a resident in care. The investigation, which included observation, interviews, and record review, concluded that the allegation was unfounded. No deficiencies were cited in this report.
The facility underwent an Annual Inspection focused on Infection Control. The LPA observed proper signage, adequate supplies of PPE, and established plans for COVID-19 protocols. Crucially, the report explicitly states that no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations.
Mnk Group LLC
CHRISTOPHER TANABE
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
6 reviews from families & visitors
Official Website
Visit aaspenvillage.com
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
These are the 6 closest facilities in our data within 10 miles. Proximity does not mean they provide the same care type or have stronger quality signals, so compare each profile and verify services directly.
Aaspen Villagecare II
< 1 miAssisted Living · Yucca Valley, CA
Jasmin Terrace at Yucca Valley
< 1 miAssisted Living · Yucca Valley, CA
Ingleside Lodge
< 1 miAssisted Living · Yucca Valley, CA
Aaspen Village Care III
1.7 miAssisted Living · Yucca Valley, CA
Joshua Tree Post Acute
1.8 miNursing Home · Yucca Valley, CA
Indian Canyon Post Acute
2.8 miNursing Home · Yucca Valley, CA