Winston Park L L C
Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight skilled and compassionate nursing staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 9 Google reviews
Watch Winston Park L L C
Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.
We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
What this means for your family
Winston Park is an excellent choice for families seeking high-level medical oversight, particularly for residents with complex needs or mobility issues, thanks to the owner's nursing background. The staff's communication and responsiveness are significant strengths to rely on during transitions of care.
Google Reviews
Google Reviews
9 reviews analyzed“Winston Park is highly regarded for its compassionate, skilled nursing staff and its ability to provide specialized care for residents with complex medical needs. Families specifically praise the facility's cleanliness, the owner's nursing expertise, and the effective communication regarding medical troubleshooting.”
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
- Skilled and compassionate nursing staff
- Clean and spacious environment
- Strong medical oversight and communication
- Effective care for bedbound or high-needs residents
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution
How They Respond to Reviews
Questions for Your Tour
- 1Since your nursing team is so highly regarded, how do they typically communicate daily health updates or changes in condition to us as a family?
- 2We are looking for a place that feels very tidy and comfortable; could you show us some of the more spacious private areas and how the common spaces are maintained?
- 3How does the medical oversight team manage care transitions for residents who might require more intensive or hands-on assistance?
- 4In the event of a medical emergency during the night, what is the specific protocol for getting immediate care for a resident?
- 5What kind of daily activities or social outings do you organize to help residents stay engaged with the community?
- 6We noticed how much you value feedback from families; how do you typically incorporate resident or family suggestions into the facility's care plans?
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The staff is caring, skillful and respectful; the food is good and individualized; the house is spacious, clean and comfortanle. Adriana keeps in close touch with us and always responds quickly to questions.”
“My mother was in another assisted living home in Mesa prior to coming here. She was only at the other home for 4 days, before going back to the ER for some serious issues that I believe were caused by the other group home's neglect. My mother was bed bound for 4 months prior to coming to Winston Park. Within a couple of weeks of them working with my mother, she has to be able to transfer fr”
“Winston Park is a beautiful, safe, and caring environment. We selected the home over four different facilities in the East Valley for my 96 year old grandmother.”
State Inspection History
State Inspections
Source: AZ State Licensing Agency
Jan 20, 2026ComplaintCleanReport
No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00156493 conducted on January 20, 2026.
May 8, 2024Routine
The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection conducted on May 8, 2024:
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure the health care institution developed and administered a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident. Findings include: 1. Review of facility documentation did not reveal documentation that the facility developed or administered a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery. 2. Review of E1's and E2's personnel records did not reveal documentation of fall prevention and fall recovery training. 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the health care institution had not developed and administered a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery.
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to immediately report suspected abuse according to A.R.S. \'a7 46-454. Findings include: 1. A.R.S. \'a7 46-454(A) stated "...person who has responsibility for the care of a vulnerable adult and who has a reasonable basis to believe that abuse, neglect or exploitation of the adult has occurred shall immediately report or cause reports to be made of such reasonable basis to a peace officer or to the adult protective services central intake unit ... All of the above reports shall be made immediately by telephone or online." 2. R9-10-101.110 stated "Immediate" means without delay. 3. Review of facility incident reports revealed a document titled "Report of Suspected Abuse, Neglect, or Exploitation" dated March 4, 2024. This document reported an incident where a CNA providing hospice service at the facility injured R5's fingers and shouted at R5. 4. In an interview, E1 reported an internal investigation was conducted, however the incident was not reported to adult protective services (APS) or the police. E1 acknowledged the suspected abuse was not reported according to A.R.S. \'a7 46-454.
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver provided documentation of completing a caregiver training program approved by the Department or the Board of Examiners for Nursing Care Institution Administrators and Assisted Living Facility Managers (NCIA Board), for one of two caregivers reviewed. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk to the residents if the employees were not trained. Findings include: 1. Review of E2's personnel record revealed E2's position was listed as caregiver and had a hire date of Janaury 3, 2024. 2. Review of E2's personnel record revealed no documentation of completing a caregiver training program approved by the NCIA Board. In addition, E2's record did not include documentation showing an administrator's license, a nursing license, or employment as a caregiver prior to November 1, 1998. Therefore, E2 was not qualified to be left alone with the residents based on the lack of caregiver training. 3. In an interview, E1 reported that E2 was a caregiver at the facility, and provided assisted living services to residents without the supervision of a manager or caregiver. E1 reported that E2 had a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) license, and thought that was a valid substitute for a caregiver training program approved by the Department or NCIA board. E1 acknowledged that E2 did not provide documentation of completing a caregiver training program approved by the Department or NCIA board.
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident accepted by the assisted living facility submitted documentation signed by a medical practitioner or a registered nurse that stated whether the individual required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints, for one of four residents reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs. Findings include: 1. A review of R3's (admitted in 2023) medical record revealed no documentation that stated whether the resident required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged R3 did not provide documentation signed by a medical practitioner or a registered nurse that stated whether the resident required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints.
Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure a rechargeable fire extinguisher was serviced at least once every 12 months. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk to the residents if a fire extinguisher was needed and did not work properly. Findings include: 1. During the facility tour with E1, the Compliance Officer observed a rechargeable fire extinguisher. This fire extinguisher had a service tag attached dated February 2023. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the rechargeable fire extinguisher was not serviced at least once every 12 months.
Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident bathroom contained a slip-resistant surface in the shower. Findings include: 1. During the facility tour with E1, the Compliance Officer observed the two resident bathrooms that contained showers. However, the showers did not contain a slip-resistant surface. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the showers did not contain a slip-resistant surface.
Contact
Get in Touch
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
References & Resources
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
9 reviews from families & visitors
Medicare data downloads
Original nursing home datasets
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Nearby Alternatives
Kachina House
3.2 miAdult Family Home · Mesa, AZ
The Villa at Bella Vista
3.5 miAssisted Living · Mesa, AZ
Harmony Care Assisted Living LLC
6.8 miAssisted Living · Scottsdale, AZ
Desert Rose Assisted Living Health LLC
8.4 miAssisted Living · Chandler, AZ
Highland Assisted Living LLC
8.6 miAssisted Living · Chandler, AZ
Circles of Life Residential Care
9.2 miAssisted Living · Chandler, AZ