The Landings of Prescott Valley
Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight modern and beautiful facility. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 35 Google reviews
Watch The Landings of Prescott Valley
Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.
We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
What this means for your family
While the facility offers a beautiful environment and engaging activities, the recent trend of highly critical reviews regarding medication errors and understaffing is alarming. If you choose this facility, you must proactively verify their nursing protocols and staffing levels during night and weekend shifts.
Google Reviews
Google Reviews
35 reviews analyzed“Families often praise the facility's beautiful, modern building and the compassionate, friendly nature of the staff. However, there are extremely serious allegations regarding medication mismanagement, understaffing in memory care, and instances of neglect or theft that require careful investigation.”
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
- Modern and beautiful facility
- Compassionate and caring staff
- Engaging daily activities and events
- Clean and well-maintained environment
Concerns
- Medication management errors (mentioned by 3 reviewers)
- Understaffing, particularly in memory care (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
- Unresponsive call buttons/slow response times (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
- Issues with resident safety and wandering (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
- Theft or missing personal items (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution
How They Respond to Reviews
This facility responds to some reviews.
Questions for Your Tour
- 1We've heard such wonderful things about how beautiful and modern this facility is; could you show us some of the common areas where residents gather?
- 2What kind of engaging daily activities or special events do you have planned for the residents this month?
- 3Could you walk us through your specific protocols for medication administration and how you ensure accuracy for every resident?
- 4How do you manage call button response times to ensure that residents feel heard and supported immediately when they need assistance?
- 5What specific safety measures and monitoring are in place to prevent wandering and ensure the security of residents, especially in the memory care wing?
- 6In the event of a medical emergency after hours, what is the immediate process for contacting doctors and ensuring resident safety?
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The Landings goes above and beyond to make the residents feel loved and cared for.”
“The Landings of Prescott Valley is just about the cleanest and most beautiful assisted living facility I have ever been to.”
“Medication distribution is the most worrying of the problems we experienced in regard to nursing.”
State Inspection History
State Inspections
Source: AZ State Licensing Agency
Feb 25, 2026Complaint
The following deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaints 00159963, 00158783, 00158776, 00157957, 00157950, 00153457 and 00153452 conducted on February 25, 2026:
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that the health, safety, or welfare of a resident was not placed at risk of harm. The deficient practice posed a risk to health and safety as the resident's whereabouts were unknown. Findings include: 1. A review of R3's medical record revealed a service plan dated February 16, 2026, that indicated R3 had a diagnosis of advanced dementia and was receiving directed care services. The service plan also revealed that R3 was ambulatory, disoriented to person/place/time, was unable to recognize danger, and was prone to getting into dangerous situations. 2. A review of R3's medical record revealed a document dated February 22, 2026, detailing an incident when R3 eloped from the facility. According to this document, R3 was observed in the dining room taking lunch to another part of the facility. Around 3pm, staff became unaware of R3's whereabouts in the community. The facility did a search of the entire building. When R3 could not be located, the facility called the power of attorney and the police around 3:50pm. 3. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided.
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure medication was administered to a resident in compliance with a medication order. The deficient practice posed a risk if the resident experienced a change in condition due to improper administration of medication. Findings include: 1. A review of R2’s medical record revealed R2’s current service plan dated February 9, 2026. The service plan revealed R2 required medication administration. 2. A review of R2's February 2026 medication administration record (MAR) revealed R2 was administered the following medication: Olanzapine 5mg 1 tab by mouth once a day at 1pm on February 15-25; Lorazepam oral pill, 1mg by mouth every 4 hours, at 8am, 12pm, 4pm, and 8pm on February 6-8 and at 8am on February 9; and Seroquel oral pill, 50 mg tab, 0.5 by mouth two times a week, at bedtime on February 7, 11, and 14. 3. A review of R2's medical record revealed no signed or verbal orders for Olanzapine, Lorazepam, and Seroquel. 4. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1, and no additional information was provided.
Oct 6, 2025Complaint
The following deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaints 00146766 and 00146879 conducted on October 06, 2025:
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure before providing assisted living services to a resident, a caregiver provided current documentation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training certification specific to adults for one of three personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if an employee was unable to meet a resident's needs during an emergency. Findings include: 1. A review of E5's personnel record revealed that E5 was hired as a caregiver in October 2023. The record included a first aid and CPR card issued on November 2, 2024, with a renewal date of November 2, 2026. However, the certification was from ‘NationalCPRFoundation,’ which provides online-only training and does not include a hands-on demonstration of CPR skills. Therefore, a valid CPR certification for E5 could not be verified from November 2024 to the present. 2. A review of the website "nationalcprfoundation.com" revealed the following, "National CPR Foundation... We're a Premium Online Certification Provider for Healthcare Providers, Workplace Individuals and the Community. We offer a 100% risk-free, money-back guarantee on all Courses! Made Quick, Easy & Simple!" 3. A review of the facility’s work schedule revealed that E5 provided assisted living services to residents during the NOC shift (10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.) on September 29, 30, and October 1, 2025. 4. In an interview, E2 and E3 acknowledged that E5 did not have valid current documentation of CPR training.
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident had a written service plan to include a description of the resident's medical or health problems, including physical, behavioral, cognitive, or functional conditions or impairments, for two of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as the service plan did not reinforce and clarify the services to be provided to a resident. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a service plan dated August 08, 2025, for personal care services. However, the service plan did not include a description of R1's medical or health problems, including physical, behavioral, cognitive, or functional conditions or impairments. 2. A review of R2's medical record revealed a service plan dated August 05, 2025, for directed care services. However, the service plan did not include a description of R2's medical or health problems, including physical, behavioral, cognitive, or functional conditions or impairments. 3. In an interview, E1 reported that the facility provides a link to the resident’s family, granting access to the resident’s chart, which includes all resident information that families can review daily. However, the electronically signed service plans did not include the resident’s medical or health problems. E1 acknowledged that R1’s and R2’s service plans did not include a description of the residents’ medical or health problems, including physical, behavioral, cognitive, or functional conditions or impairments.
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's written service plan included the amount, type, and frequency of assisted living services being provided to the resident, for two of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as the service plans did not reinforce and clarify the services to be provided to a resident. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a current service plan dated August 2025. The service plan stated the following; "Assistance with laundry; Assistance with housekeeping - Frequency: As scheduled - Responsible: Caregivers, Med Tech." However, this service plan did not include the amount, type, or frequency of laundry and housekeeping services provided. 2. A review of R2's medical record revealed a current service plan dated August 2025. The service plan stated the following; "Assistance with laundry; Assistance with housekeeping - Frequency: As scheduled - Responsible: Caregivers, Med Tech." However, this service plan did not include the amount, type, or frequency of laundry and housekeeping services provided. 3. In an interview, E1 reported that staff go into residents' rooms daily to clean rooms, check if the bedsheets need to be changed. E1 acknowledged that R1's and R2's service plans did not include the amount, type, and frequency of assisted living services provided to R1 and R2.
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a service plan included cognitive stimulation and activities to maximize functioning; documentation of the resident's weight, or documentation from a medical practitioner stating that weighing the resident is contraindicated; and coordination of communications with the resident's representative, family members, and, if applicable, other individuals identified in the resident's service plan, for one of one resident reviewed receiving directed care services. The deficient practice posed a health risk to the resident. 1. A review of R2's medical record revealed a written service plan dated August 2025. However, this service plan did not include cognitive stimulation and activities to maximize functioning; documentation of the resident's weight, or documentation from a medical practitioner stating that weighing the resident is contraindicated; and coordination of communications with the resident's representative and/or family members. 2. In an interview, E2 and E4 reported R2 received directed care services and acknowledged that the service plans did not include the above-mentioned requirements.
Mar 7, 2024Complaint
The following deficiencies were found during the compliance inspection and investigation of complaints AZ00189244, AZ00204576 and AZ00204783 conducted on March 7, 2024.
Based on record review and interview the health care institution failed to administer a training program for staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery, including initial training and continued competency training. Findings include: 1. Review of the record for E1 (hired April 11, 2022), failed to reveal that fall prevention and fall recovery continued competency training had been conducted at the frequency identified in the facility policy. Documentation indicated that the last training had been conducted on February 27, 2023. 2. Review of the record for E3 (hired March 11, 2022), failed to reveal that fall prevention and fall recovery continued competency training had been conducted at the frequency identified in the facility policy. Documentation indicated that the last training had been conducted on February 5, 2023. 3. Review of the facility policy and procedure for fall prevention and fall recovery training indicated that continued competency training would be conducted "..on an annual basis.". 4. During an interview, E1 acknowledged that continued competency training for fall prevention and fall recovery had not been conducted as specified in policy and procedure.
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that one of one sample resident records contained documentation of medication administered to the resident that includes all areas identified in subsections a. through d. of this rule. Findings include: 1. The record for R1 contained no record of the medications administered to the resident from the date of admission until one month prior to the residents discharge. 2. During an interview, E4 stated, "She got medications daily since admission. Our MAR software program only stores 14 days of information. I was able to retrieve 30 days for your review. 3. During an interview, E1 acknowledged the resident record did not contain documentation of the medication administered to the resident.
Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a current toxicology reference guide was available for use by personnel members. Findings include: 1. The toxicology guide available for use by personnel members was the Lang Poisoning and Drug Overdose manual, 7th edition. 2. The Internet web site for the toxicology guide revealed that a more current edition was available for distribution. 3. During an interview, E1 acknowledged that a current toxicology reference guide was not available for use by personnel members.
Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that one of one pet that was allowed in the facility, was licensed consistent with local ordinances. Findings include: 1. Documentation for O1, a dog allowed in the facility reflected that the dog's license expired on February 25, 2024. 2. During a telephone interview with the local authority it was determined that the dog required a license. 3. During an interview, E1 acknowledged that facility documentation failed to indicate the dog had a current license.
Based on record review and interview, the chief administrative officer failed to ensure that the health care institution established, documented, and implemented tuberculosis infection control activities that included annually providing training and education related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of tuberculosis (TB) to individuals employed by the health care institution. Findings include: 1. Review of the record for E3 failed to reveal documentation indicating that annual training related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of TB had been completed. No TB training documentation was available for review. 2. During an interview, E1 acknowledge that the required documentation was not available.
Based on documentation review and interview, the chief administrative officer failed to ensure that the health care institution establishes, documents, and implements tuberculosis infection control activities that included annually assessing the health care institution's risk of exposure to infectious tuberculosis. Findings include: 1. Review of facility documentation failed to reveal an annual assessment of the health care institution's risk of exposure to infectious tuberculosis. 2. During an interview, E1 acknowledged that the required documentation was not available for review.
Contact
Get in Touch
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
References & Resources
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
35 reviews from families & visitors
Medicare data downloads
Original nursing home datasets
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Nearby Alternatives
Prescott Valley Nursing & Rehabilitation
< 1 miNursing Home · Prescott Valley, AZ
Aimee's Arizona Angels
< 1 miAssisted Living · Prescott Valley, AZ
New Horizons Adult Care Home #2
< 1 miAssisted Living · Prescott Valley, AZ
Drew Assisted Living Institution
1.0 miAssisted Living · Prescott Valley, AZ
Dreamcare Prescott Valley
1.8 miAdult Family Home · Prescott Valley, AZ
Prescott Valley Assisted Living
2.6 miAssisted Living · Prescott Valley, AZ