See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Nursing HomeMedicaid Investigative

Sharmar Village Senior Care Community

Below-average Medicare ratings — review the inspection history and ask the administrator about recent corrections before visiting.

1209 W Abriendo Ave, Aberdeen · Pueblo, CO 8100459 bedsLicensed & Active
Source: CO CDPHE — view official record
2/5
Medicare
Inspection
Quality
Staffing
Google rating
4.2/5

based on 51 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1
Sharmar Village Senior Care Community Nursing Home in Pueblo, CO — Street View
Street View

Watch Sharmar Village Senior Care Community

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

4/ 10
moderate Risk

Quality Concerns Identified

Medicare inspection and quality data reveal areas that families should carefully evaluate before choosing this facility.

  • Low staffing rating (2/5 stars)
  • Above-median deficiencies (11 vs median 7)
  • High staff turnover (67%)
  • High RN turnover (71%)

Below average in CO · Meets national RN staffing standard · $72,840 in fines

Source: Medicare data

What this means for your family

This facility is highly regarded for its rehabilitation outcomes and compassionate nursing staff, making it a strong candidate for recovery. However, families should be prepared for potential hurdles with the administrative team; ensure you have a direct line of communication with a specific supervisor and document all requests to avoid the unresponsiveness noted by several families.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

51 reviews on Google
Sharmar Village receives high praise for its compassionate nursing staff and effective rehabilitation services, with many families noting that their loved ones felt treated like family. However, there is a recurring pattern of administrative failures, specifically regarding poor communication, unresponsiveness to inquiries, and concerns about understaffing. Families should be aware that while clinical care is often highly rated, the facility's front-office management and responsiveness to concerns can be inconsistent.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food10.0Staff7.0Clean8.0Activities9.0MedsN/AMemoryN/AComms2.0Value10.0

Strengths

  • Compassionate and friendly nursing staff
  • Effective rehabilitation services
  • Clean and well-maintained facility
  • Active engagement with residents

Concerns

  • Poor communication and lack of follow-up from administration (mentioned by 4 reviewers)
  • Understaffing issues (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
  • Negative experiences with specific administrative staff members (mentioned by 2 reviewers)

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

234'17(2)'19(9)'21(4)'23(5)'25(8)'26(1)

Distribution · 54 analyzed

5
42
4
1
3
1
2
2
1
8

How They Respond to Reviews

13%response rate

This facility rarely responds to reviews.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1It's wonderful to see how clean and well-maintained the facility looks; what specific routines do you have in place to keep the community so tidy?
  • 2We've heard great things about the compassion of your nursing staff; how do you ensure that same level of friendly care is consistent across all shifts?
  • 3How does the administration ensure that families are kept closely informed and updated on any changes in a resident's care plan?
  • 4With the rehabilitation services being a known strength here, could you walk us through how a resident transitions from therapy back into their daily routine?
  • 5What kind of daily activities or social engagements are available to help residents stay active and connected with one another?
  • 6In the event of a medical emergency during the night, what is the protocol for notifying the family and ensuring immediate care?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

The staff at Sharmar was so good to my mother. They treated her like a family member. She had great therapy, lots of activities and Jenna and Lisa brought her special treats.

Memory care family member · 2025★★★★★

They are definitely understaffed, and the staff that does work there will say one thing to you, but then do another. We left numerous messages with staff, and also talk to them face-to-face. But, they would never call us back, and situations were never resolved.

Long-term resident's family · 2017☆☆☆☆

After trying to get ahold of the facility on multiple occasions and no call back. Once we did get ahold of them we were denied service. Hope the care is better than the administration I wouldn’t count on it.

Prospective family member · 2024☆☆☆☆
Source: 51 Google reviews

Staffing

Staffing Hours

per resident/day · Medicare 2026
RN Hours
1.04hrs
OK
Registered nurses for medical care
Total Nursing
3.63hrs
88%
All nurses + aides combined
Staff Turnover
61%
Lower is better (< 30% = good)
RN Turnover
53%
Lower is better (< 30% = good)

Total nursing hours are below minimum, though RN coverage is adequate. This may mean fewer aides for daily tasks like bathing and mobility.

Quality Measures

Quality Measures

Resident outcomes compared with national, state, and local averages · 17 measures

Medicare Rating
4/ 5
Better Than Avg

7

measures

Worse Than Avg

9

measures

Mixed Results

1

measures

Long-Stay Residents
💊

Residents on anti-anxiety or sleep medication

↓ Lower is better
This Facility10.2%
Better than Avg
Here
10.2%
US
19.5%
CO
11.3%
Pueblo
11.5%
💉

Residents vaccinated for the flu

↑ Higher is better
This Facility88.9%
Worse than Avg
Here
88.9%
US
95.5%
CO
94.7%
Pueblo
97.1%
💊

Residents on antipsychotic medication

↓ Lower is better
This Facility21.8%
Worse than Avg
Here
21.8%
US
15.5%
CO
20.0%
Pueblo
19.6%
🚿

Residents whose bladder or bowel control got worse

↓ Lower is better
This Facility25.7%
Worse than Avg
Here
25.7%
US
19.4%
CO
21.7%
Pueblo
22.6%
⚖️

Residents who lost too much weight

↓ Lower is better
This Facility10.9%
Worse than Avg
Here
10.9%
US
5.3%
CO
5.0%
Pueblo
4.7%
🛏️

Residents needing more daily help over time

↓ Lower is better
This Facility8.5%
Better than Avg
Here
8.5%
US
14.4%
CO
13.8%
Pueblo
12.3%
Short-Stay Residents (Rehab / Post-Acute)
💉

Short-stay residents vaccinated for pneumonia

↑ Higher is better
This Facility56.7%
Worse than Avg
Here
56.7%
US
81.8%
CO
76.3%
Pueblo
74.9%
💉

Short-stay residents vaccinated for the flu

↑ Higher is better
This Facility68.2%
Worse than Avg
Here
68.2%
US
79.8%
CO
75.6%
Pueblo
82.8%
💊

Short-stay residents newly given antipsychotics

↓ Lower is better
This Facility0.0%
Better than Avg
Here
0.0%
US
1.6%
CO
1.5%
Pueblo
0.3%
Source: Medicare quality measures

US average from Medicare published data

Inspection History

Medicare Inspection History

3-year lookback · Medicare 2026

11deficiencies
4penalties
Above state avg (8.8)
8 complaint-triggered
$72,840 in fines

Families have filed multiple complaints against this facility, triggering 8 deficiencies, with recurring safety and accident prevention issues appearing across three separate complaint investigations from 2024-2025. The most frequent problem areas involve safety hazards and accident prevention, medication management, and care quality issues including respiratory care and wound care. While the facility has corrected all cited deficiencies, the pattern of repeated safety violations from family complaints warrants careful consideration during your visit.

Aug 11, 2025Complaint
6
0689Actual harm · IsolatedCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

0565Potential for harm · PatternCorrected

Resident Rights Deficiencies

Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.

0679Potential for harm · PatternCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.

0684Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

0695Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

0803Minimal · PatternCorrected

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies

Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.

Feb 27, 2025Routine
4
0690Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.

0758Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies

Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.

0880Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Infection Control Deficiencies

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

0881Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Infection Control Deficiencies

Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.

Feb 27, 2025Complaint
1
0689Actual harm · IsolatedCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

Apr 1, 2024Complaint
1
0689Actual harm · IsolatedCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

Aug 14, 2023Routine
13
0760Immediate jeopardy · IsolatedCorrected

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies

Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.

0688Actual harm · IsolatedCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.

0867Actual harm · IsolatedCorrected

Administration Deficiencies

Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.

0812Potential for harm · WidespreadCorrected

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

0921Potential for harm · WidespreadCorrected

Environmental Deficiencies

Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.

0925Potential for harm · WidespreadCorrected

Environmental Deficiencies

Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.

0550Potential for harm · PatternCorrected

Resident Rights Deficiencies

Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

0584Potential for harm · PatternCorrected

Resident Rights Deficiencies

Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

0689Potential for harm · PatternCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

0554Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Resident Rights Deficiencies

Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.

0656Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

0679Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.

0695Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

May 10, 2022Routine
10
0030Potential for harm · WidespreadCorrected

Emergency Preparedness Deficiencies

List the names and contact information of those in the facility.

0031Potential for harm · WidespreadCorrected

Emergency Preparedness Deficiencies

Provide emergency officials' contact information.

0658Potential for harm · PatternCorrected

Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies

Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

0600Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies

Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

0686Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

0688Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.

0744Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.

0761Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies

Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

0807Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies

Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.

0849Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Administration Deficiencies

Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.

Federal Penalties

Fine

Aug 11, 2025

$12,438

Fine

Feb 27, 2025

$33,248

Fine

Apr 1, 2024

$12,048

Fine

Aug 14, 2023

$15,106

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: CO Dept. of Public Health & Environment

10total
5deficiencies
Nov 6, 2025Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Nov 6, 2025Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Aug 11, 2025Complaint
N/A0000 & 0704

A survey prompted by complaint #CO1943421 was completed on 8/6/25 to 8/11/25. One deficiency was cited. Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#3, #8 and #11) of six residents reviewed for accidents out of 21 sample residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on 3/12/25 with diagnoses of displaced intertrochanteric (upper thigh bone - hip fracture) fracture, acute pain due to trauma and orthostatic hypotension. The resident was known to be a fall risk upon admission due to her fall at home which resulted in the resident’s left hip fracture. However, the fall assessment completed on 3/12/25 documented the resident had not fallen and was a low risk for falls. The facility implemented a fall care plan upon admission which included ensuring items were within the resident’s reach.On 4/18/25 Resident #3 turned her call light on after using the bedside commode in her room. When staff had not responded to the call light after 15 minutes, the resident stood up from the commode and attempted to reach the toilet wipes, which were not within easy reach. The resident sustained a fall which resulted in her transfer to the hospital where she was discovered to have a right wrist fracture and right hip fracture which required surgical repair. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Implement effective fall interventions in order to prevent a fall with major injury to Resident #3;-Ensure fall interventions were consistently implemented for Resident #8; and,-Ensure Resident #11’s foot pedals were in place on her wheelchair when staff were transporting the resident.IV. Resident #11A. Resident statusResident #11, age greater than 65, was admitted on 8/1/25. According to the August 2025 CPO, diagnoses included dementia, history of transient ischemic attack (a brief and temporary interruption of blood flow to the brain) and history of falling.The 8/2/25 nursing admission assessment revealed the resident was confused and had short-term and long-term memory problems. She required assistance from staff for most ADLs and used a wheelchair. The nursing admission assessment..

Aug 11, 2025Complaint
N/A0000, 0565, 0679 and 4 more

A complaint survey, prompted by #CO1943423, #CO1943426, #CO2573565, #CO2579283, #CO2581702, Incident #2564193 and Incident #2564212 was conducted on 8/6/25 to 8/11/25. Six deficiencies were cited. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one (#8) of two residents out of 21 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff followed the physician ordered pain parameters when administering as needed (PRN) pain medication to Resident #8.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Pain Management policy, dated 2025, was provided by the nursing home administrat.. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that four (#1, #14, #7 and #2 of seven residents reviewed for activities received an ongoing program of activities designed to meet needs and interests, and promote physical, medical, and psychosocial well-being out of 21 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to offer and provide a personalized activity program for four Residents (#1, #14, #7 and #2). IV. Resident #21.Resident statusResident #2, age greater than 65, was admitted on 5/15/24. According to the August 2025 CPO, d.. Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to address and/or act promptly upon the grievances and recommendations during resident council on issues of resident care and quality of life in the facility that were important to the residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure resident council grievances were addressed to resolve resident concerns related to call light response times.Findings include:I. Facility policyThe Grievance policy, dated September 2016, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 8/11/25 at 4:1.. Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure menus met the resident' s nutritional needs.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided adequate food to ensure they were not hungry after meals and in between meals. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedure The Menu Planning and Requirements policy, dated 2020, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 8/11/25 at 12:33 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, “Menus are planned to provide nourishing, palatable, attractive meals that meet the nutr.. Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper respiratory treatment and care for two (#9 and #16) of the three residents reviewed for oxygen use out of 21 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure Resident #9 and #16 did not run out of oxygen in their portable oxygen tanks; and,-Ensure staff used the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when filling residents’ portable oxygen tanks.II. Resident #16A. Resident statusResident #16, age 71, was admitted on 3/12/18 and readmitt.. Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#3, #8 and #11) of six residents reviewed for accidents out of 21 sample residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on 3/12/25 with diagnoses of displaced intertrochanteric (upper thigh bone - hip fracture) fracture, acute pain due to trauma and orthostatic hypotension. The resident was known to be a fall risk upon admission due to her fall at home which resulted in the resident’s left hip fracture. However, the fall assessme..

May 28, 2025Follow-up
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Apr 23, 2025Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Apr 23, 2025Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Mar 10, 2025Routine
N/A0000 & 0363

Based on observation it was determined the facility failed to maintain corridor doors in accordance with NFPA 101.Rm#7 Do not stop the passage of smoke (door gap)2.Rm#29 Do not stop the passage of smoke (does not latch)NFPA 101, 19.3.6.3.1 19.3.6.3.1* Doors protecting corridor openings in other than required enclosures of vertical openings, exits, or hazardous areas shall be doors constructed to resist the passage of smoke.This deficiency has the potential to affect occupants, who might include residents, staff, and visitors within the 2 of 4 Smoke Compartments. Deficient items were discussed with the maintenance director and administrator at the exit conference. The facility is one story, Type V (000), wood framed structure. The facility is classified as fully protected by a National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 13 automatic fire sprinkler systems. The facility ' s fire sprinkler system is a wet pipe system that contains an anti-freeze loop with a propylene glycol solution and protects the front and back porch only. The facility was constructed in 1989. Also located on the property is an Assisted Living Facility that is separated from the Long Term Care Facility by a two-hour fire rated wall. The 59 bed facility was surveyed on March 10, 2025 using the National Fire Protection Association, (NFPA) Life Safety Code (2012) chapter 19, Existing Health Care Occupancies. An exit conference was conducted with the Executive Director and Physical Plant Manager at the end on-site survey.

Ownership & Operations

Who Operates This Facility

Owner / Operator

Sharmar Village Senior Care Community

Organization Type

for profit

Ownership & Management

Owners

Continuum at Sharmar, INC.

Owner · Organization

Continuum Health Partnerships INC

Owner · Organization

Briscoe, Stephen

Owner (parent company)

100%

Briscoe, Stephen

Individual is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any Adp of the Snf

Key personnel

Briscoe, StephenOfficer / DirectorContinuum at Sharmar, INC.ManagerContinuum Health Management LLCManagerBriscoe, StephenManagerHolt, JessicaManager
Source: Medicare provider data

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Safer Alternatives Nearby

Based on current clinical data, we identified 6 nearby facilities within 10 miles that may offer a stronger care environment. We encourage families to compare options carefully.

Call