Oakmont of Folsom

The report details a complaint investigation conducted regarding allegations of medication mismanagement, inadequate food services, failure to provide records timely, and privacy violations. Based on interviews, observations, and documentation, the investigator found insufficient evidence to prove any of the alleged violations occurred.

The case management visit focused on a past incident involving a resident's scabies treatment. The primary deficiency cited relates to the facility's failure to report this incident to the licensing agency within the required seven-day timeframe. This is classified as a Type B deficiency, indicating a potential, but not immediate, risk to resident care.

The case management visit focused on a past incident involving a resident's scabies treatment. The primary deficiency cited relates to the facility's failure to report this incident to the licensing agency within the required seven-day timeframe. This is classified as a Type B deficiency, indicating a potential, but not immediate, risk to resident care.

The facility underwent an unannounced annual inspection. The inspector toured various areas, including resident rooms, medication room, kitchen, and common areas, noting no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations. No deficiencies were cited as a result of today's inspection.

The inspection was a case management follow-up regarding a medication error incident. A deficiency was cited related to medication administration protocols. The facility must correct this issue by providing proof of training to all staff handling medication.

The facility underwent an unannounced Case Management visit on April 2, 2025. The Licensing Program Analysts met with the Executive Director and obtained resident documents related to an incident that occurred on March 15, 2025. No deficiencies were cited during this inspection.

This report details the findings of a complaint investigation regarding alleged mismanagement of client medication. The investigation found that the allegation was unsubstantiated based on staff interviews and facility observations. No deficiencies were cited in this report.