See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Assisted Living Investigative

North Pointe of Mayodan

Reviewer concerns include poor quality of memory care unit — investigate before committing.

6970 Nc Hwy 135, Mayodan, NC 2702770 bedsLicensed & Active
Source: NC DHSR — view official record
Google rating
2.8/5

based on 16 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1

Watch North Pointe of Mayodan

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

While some families have experienced excellent communication and compassionate care from the staff, the recent influx of 1-star reviews is a significant red flag. If you are considering the memory care unit, it is critical to visit in person and speak with current residents' families, as recent feedback specifically warns against the memory care quality.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

16 reviews on Google
Families should approach this facility with caution due to a high volume of recent 1-star reviews and several textless negative ratings. While some long-term family members praise the compassionate staff and effective communication regarding medication and behavior, recent feedback specifically highlights significant concerns regarding the quality of the memory care unit.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
FoodN/AStaff8.0Clean5.0ActivitiesN/AMeds10.0Memory1.0Comms9.0ValueN/A

Strengths

  • Compassionate and dedicated staff
  • Strong communication regarding resident updates
  • Clean and organized environment

Concerns

  • Poor quality of memory care unit
  • High volume of recent negative reviews (mentioned by 6 reviewers)

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

2343.52017(2)4.02020(4)1.02023(1)2.32024(9)

Distribution · 16 analyzed

5
7
4
0
3
0
2
1
1
8

How They Respond to Reviews

0%response rate

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1I've noticed some families mention how much they appreciate the updates they receive; how do you typically keep families informed about their loved one's daily well-being?
  • 2What specific programming and specialized support do you have in place for residents who require memory care?
  • 3Since the facility is so well-regarded for being clean and organized, how do you manage the daily upkeep of the common areas?
  • 4Could you walk me through the protocol for handling a medical emergency or a sudden change in health during the night?
  • 5What kind of daily activities or social outings do you organize to keep the residents engaged with one another?
  • 6How do you ensure that the high level of compassion and dedication seen in your staff is maintained across all shifts?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

The young ladies employed there are dedicated and amazingly compassionate. They consistently keep my father and I up to date on medication changes and any behavioral issues.

Resident's family · 2020★★★★★

Starting from the top - Kathy Petty has been exceptionally available to keep me updated on myES mother since I live in another state.

Resident's family · 2020★★★★★

I stopped there and brought some items for the people, and I found the place to be clean neat organized, very humble people working there.

Community visitor · 2024★★★★★
Source: 16 Google reviews

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: NC Division of Health Service Regulation

14total
16deficiencies
Feb 12, 2026Follow-up
General Staffing Requirements for Adult CareD 184

The facility failed to ensure the minimum number of staff were present to meet the needs of residents in the Special Care Unit (SCU) for 9 of 21 sampled shifts between 01/04/26 and 01/10/26. Specifically, audits of time punch cards revealed significant shortages in aide hours across first, second, and third shifts on multiple dates.

Feb 12, 2026Follow-up
Tuberculosis Test, Medical Exam & ImmunizationsD 234

The facility failed to comply with requirements for tuberculosis testing upon admission to the adult care home as specified by the Commission for Public Health.

General Staffing Requirements for Adult Care HomesD 184

The facility failed to ensure the minimum number of staff were present to meet resident needs in the Special Care Unit (SCU) for 9 of 21 sampled shifts. Specifically, multiple shifts between January 4 and January 9, 2026, showed significant shortages in aide hours across first, second, and third shifts.

Oct 23, 2025Follow-up
Physical EnvironmentD 067

The facility failed to ensure that 3 out of 8 exit doors had engaged audible alarms. This deficiency affected four residents identified as intermittently disoriented, including one resident who left the facility without staff knowledge.

Nov 6, 2024Follow-up
Tuberculosis Test, Medical Exam & ImmunizationsD 234

The facility failed to ensure that two of five sampled residents had completed required tuberculosis (TB) testing. Specifically, one resident lacked documentation of a second TB skin test required after admission, and another resident had no documentation of a negative or positive TB skin test upon admission, relying instead on an insufficient chest x-ray.

Nov 6, 2024Follow-up
Tuberculosis Test, Medical Exam & ImmunizationsD 234

The facility failed to ensure that 2 of 5 sampled residents had completed required tuberculosis (TB) testing in compliance with established control measures. Specifically, documentation for Resident #2 showed a negative TB skin test result but lacked evidence of the required second TB skin test.

Jul 31, 2024Follow-up
Physical EnvironmentD 056

The facility failed to maintain separate locked areas for storing hazardous cleaning agents and substances. Specifically, items such as hydrogen peroxide, nail polish remover, and lotion were observed on open shelves in resident rooms, making them accessible to residents in the Special Care Unit.

Jul 31, 2024Follow-up
Physical Environment - Housekeeping StorageN/A

The facility failed to keep cleaning agents, bleaches, and other hazardous substances in a separate locked area in the Special Care Unit (SCU). Observations revealed items such as hydrogen peroxide, nail polish remover, and various lotions sitting on open shelves in resident rooms and bathrooms. Additionally, hazardous items like deodorants were found in an unlocked spa room accessible to residents.

Mar 27, 2024Complaint
Resident RightsD338

The facility failed to protect four residents from verbal and mental abuse by a staff member. The staff member engaged in behaviors including waking residents up after they were asleep, disrespectfully speaking to residents, and forcing a resident to go to bed against their wishes.

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Safer Alternatives Nearby

Based on current clinical data, we identified 4 nearby facilities within 10 miles that may offer a stronger care environment. We encourage families to compare options carefully.

Contact