See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Assisted Living

Morningstar at Golden Ridge

Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight warm and friendly staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.

6735 West Golden Lane, Peoria, AZ 85345Licensed & Active
Google rating
4.5/5

based on 75 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1

Watch Morningstar at Golden Ridge

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

This facility is an excellent choice if you value a clean, beautiful environment and a staff that treats residents like family. However, if your loved one requires high-level medical dependency, you should conduct a thorough in-person investigation into management's oversight and staff retention, as some recent feedback suggests potential issues in those areas.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

75 reviews analyzed
Morningstar at Golden Ridge is highly regarded by families for its warm, welcoming atmosphere and exceptionally kind, attentive staff members. While many reviewers praise the beautiful, clean facilities and vibrant activity programs, some families have raised serious concerns regarding management practices and the quality of care for residents with high-acuity needs.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food9.0Staff9.0Clean10.0Activities9.0MedsN/AMemoryN/AComms8.0ValueN/A

Strengths

  • Warm and friendly staff
  • Clean and beautiful facilities
  • Engaging resident activities
  • Welcoming concierge and front desk team

Concerns

  • Management and treatment of staff (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
  • Care quality for non-independent residents (mentioned by 2 reviewers)

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

2343.02024(4)4.82025(24)5.02026(2)

Distribution

5
26
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
3

How They Respond to Reviews

100%response rate

This facility actively engages with reviewer feedback.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1We've heard such wonderful things about how warm and welcoming the front desk and concierge team are; how does that friendly culture extend to the caregiving staff?
  • 2The facility looks beautiful and very well-maintained; what is your routine for ensuring the common areas stay so clean and inviting for residents?
  • 3We would love to hear more about the different types of engaging activities you host to keep residents socially connected and active.
  • 4For residents who may need a bit more hands-on assistance with their daily needs, how do you ensure their specific care requirements are consistently met?
  • 5I noticed the management team is very responsive to feedback; how do you involve families and staff in the ongoing improvement of the community?
  • 6In the event of a medical emergency or a change in health status during the night, what is the protocol for getting immediate care for a resident?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

In my lifetime I have never been so stressed than when I was contemplating a new home for my aging Mother. I was fortunate with help to find this beautiful facility. After many sleepless nights for both myself and my wonderful mother she is in day 4 of her new adventure and she is living her best life.

Family member of a new resident · 2026★★★★★

They take such wonderful care of my grandmother and always treat her with so much kindness and respect. Every time I visit, they greet me with a smile and make me feel at ease knowing my grandma is in such good hands.

Grandchild of a resident · 2025★★★★★

I feel and broke my knee cap on my right side and fractured my left shoulder. Their care givers treated me with fantastic service. With I-3 months I am able to walk with a cane and use my left arm . I wouldn’t have been able to make fast progress with out the staffs help.

Rehab patient · 2025★★★★
Source: 75 Google reviews

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: AZ State Licensing Agency

12total
13deficiencies
Nov 19, 2025Complaint

The following deficiency was found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00151033 conducted on November 19, 2025:

a-c. PersonnelR9-10-806.C.1.a-cCorrected Dec 15, 2025

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a personnel record for each employee included documentation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training and first aid training, for one of three employees sampled. Findings include: 1. A review of E3’s personnel record revealed E3 was hired as the Assisted Living Coordinator. The review revealed documentation of CPR and first aid training dated as expired on July 18, 2025, and documentation of CPR and first aid training dated as issued on September 17, 2025. However, the review revealed no documentation of CPR and first aid training dated between July 18, 2025, and September 17, 2025. 2. In an interview, E1 stated E3 “sometimes” worked the floor as a caregiver. When the Compliance Officer asked if E3’s personnel record had documentation of CPR and first aid training dated between the aforementioned dates, E1 stated, “I’m sure there’s nothing there.” 3. In an interview, E3 reported E3 had completed CPR and first aid training for another job but did not have the certification in E3’s personnel record. Technical assistance was provided on this rule during the complaint and compliance inspection conducted on February 1, 2023.

Jul 16, 2025Other
CleanReport

No deficiencies were found during the on-site modification to change occupancy to 38 directed care beds and 86 personal care beds completed on July 16, 2025.

Jun 19, 2025Complaint

The following deficiency was found during the onsite investigation of complaint 00131841 conducted on June 19, 2025:

Health care institutions; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; first aid; immunity; falls; definitionA.R.S. § 36-420.B.1Corrected Jun 20, 2025

Based on record review and interview, the health care institution failed to initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in accordance with its certification training for CPR before the arrival of emergency medical services, to a resident who was nonresponsive or has a cessation of normal respiration, in accordance with that resident's advance directives, if known. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident. Findings include: 1. A review of R1’s medical record revealed a document titled “Resident Information”. This document, stated in the Advance Directive section, “CPR”. 2. A record review revealed a document titled “Incident Report” dated May 25, 2025. The incident report indicated that neither E2 nor E3 administered CPR when R1 was found on the floor, unresponsive, and without a pulse. The document reported that 911 was called. 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged CPR was not initiated by the caregivers and stated that “when E3 called 911, E3 was instructed not to do CPR because of the condition of the resident”.

Jun 12, 2025Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00133139 conducted on June 12, 2025.

May 20, 2025Complaint

The following deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00127968 conducted on May 20, 2025:

a-b. PersonnelR9-10-806.A.4.a-bCorrected Sep 19, 2025

Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver's skills and knowledge were verified and documented before the caregiver provided physical health services, for four of four sampled caregivers. The deficient practice posed a risk if a caregiver did not have the skills and knowledge necessary to meet a resident's needs and the Department was provided false or misleading information. Findings include: 1. A review of Department documentation revealed a Plan of Correction (POC) for this deficiency from the complaint and compliance inspection conducted on August 6, 2024. The POC indicated this deficiency was corrected on March 7, 2025. The POC stated: “Community now has a Policy and Procedure that designates how a caregiver’s skill and knowledge will be verified. All caregivers’ and assistant caregiver’s skills and knowledge have now been verified and documented according to the Policy and Procedure.” 2. A review of facility documentation revealed a policy and procedure (P&P) titled “New Hire Training and Competency Policy” dated March 1, 2025. The P&P stated: “A competency checklist will be used and completed upon hire and for retraining. All checklists will be reviewed and verified by the Business Officer Manager/Executive Director or designee to ensure compliance, and stored in their personnel file. The assessment/evaluation may include skills, tasks or competencies identified in the associate’s job description (i.e., bathing, handwashing, ambulation, transfer, etc.).” 3. A review of E3's, E4’s, and E6’s personnel records revealed E3, E4, and E6 were hired as caregivers before March 7, 2025 (the correction date on the POC). However, the review revealed no documentation demonstrating the manager ensured E3's, E4’s, and E6’s skills and knowledge were verified and documented before E3, E4, and E6 provided physical health services or before the correction date on the POC. 4. A review of E5's personnel record revealed E5 was hired as a caregiver after March 7, 2025 (the correction date on the POC). However, the review revealed no documentation demonstrating the manager ensured E5's skills and knowledge were verified and documented before E5 provided physical health services. 5. A review of facility documentation revealed a series of personnel schedules dated between November 2024 and May 2025. The schedules revealed E3, E4, E5, and E6 provided physical health services without E3’s, E4’s, E5’s, and E6’s skills and knowledge having first been verified and documented. 6. In an interview, E2 stated, “[E4’s] is incomplete.” When the Compliance Officer asked if E5 did not have documentation of E5’s skills and knowledge, E2 stated, “Yeah, I did not find one.” When the Compliance Officer asked about the same documentation for E3 and E6, E2 stated, “I don’t have one for any of them.” This is a repeat citation from the complaint and compliance inspection conducted on August 6, 2024.

b. Medication ServicesR9-10-816.B.3.bCorrected Sep 19, 2025

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure medication administered to a resident was administered in compliance with a medication order, for two of three sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a risk if a resident experienced a change in condition due to improper administration of medication. Findings include: 1. A review of R1’s medical record revealed a service plan which indicated R1 received medication administration. The review revealed a medication order dated April 1, 2025, for the following medications: - “OLANZAPINE 5 MG TABLET…TAKE 1 TABLET BY MOUTH DAILY AT BEDTIME;” - “OLMESARTAN MEDOXOMIL 40 MG TAB…TAKE 1 TABLET BY MOUTH DAILY;” - “PAROXETINE HCL 40 MG TABLET…TAKE 1 TABLET BY MOUTH DAILY;” - “QUETIAPINE FUMARATE 25 MG TAB…TAKE 1 TABLET BY MOUTH AT BEDTIME;” - “STIMULANT LAXATIVE PLUS TABLET…TAKE 2 TABLETS BY MOUTH DAILY AT BEDTIME;” and - “TRAZODONE 50 MG TABLET…TAKE 1 TABLET BY MOUTH DAILY AT BEDTIME.” The review revealed a series of medication administration records (MAR) dated April 2025 and May 2025 which indicated the following: - R1 did not receive olanzapine on April 7-8 and 10, 2025, as the “Medication [was] not available;” - R1 did not receive olmesartan on May 4, 2025, as the “Medication [was] not available;” - R1 did not receive paroxetine on May 4, 2025, as the “Medication [was] not available;” - R1 did not receive quetiapine on April 6-8 and 10, 2025, and May 19, 2025, as the “Medication [was] not available;” - R1 did not receive Stimulant Laxative Plus on April 17, 28, and 30, 2025, and May 2-3 and 13, 2025, as the “Medication [was] not available;” and - R1 did not receive trazodone on April 30, 2025, and May 1-2 and 11-12, 2025, as the “Medication [was] not available.” 2. A review of R3’s medical record revealed a service plan which indicated R3 received medication administration. The review revealed a medication order dated April 15, 2025, for “dorzolamide 22.3 mg-timoloL 6.6 mg/mL eye drops INSTILL 1 DROP INTO AFFECTED EYE(S) TWICE DAILY” and “latanoprost 0.005 % eye drops INSTILL 1 DROP INTO BOTH EYES AT BEDTIME.” The review revealed MARs dated April 2025 and May 2025 which indicated R3 did not receive R3’s second dose of dorzolamide on April 26, 2025, and R3’s latanoprost on May 11, 2025, as both “Medication[s were] not available.” 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged medications administered to R1 and R3 were not administered in compliance with medication orders, stating there were, “Holes in the MAR.” This is an uncorrected deficiency from the complaint inspections conducted on December 12, 2024; November 25, 2024; and September 13, 2024; and no acceptable plans of correction have been received by the Department.

Apr 1, 2025Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00124918 conducted on April 1, 2025.

Feb 6, 2025Complaint

An on-site investigation of complaint AZ00223089 was conducted on February 06, 2025, and the following deficiency was cited :

A governing authority shall:R9-10-803.A.3.b.i-ii

Based on documentation review, observation and interview, the governing authority failed to designate, in writing, a manager who has either a certificate as an assisted living facility manager issued under A.R.S. \'a7 36-446.04(C), or a temporary certificate as an assisted living facility manager issued under A.R.S. \'a7 36-446.06. The deficient practice posed a risk as the assisted living facility was unable to ensure compliance with applicable Rules. Findings include: 1. A review of Department documentation on January 4, 2025, revealed that O1 notified the Department O1 would no longer serve as the Assisted Living Manager at "AL11067 MorningStar at Golden Ridge" effective January 8, 2024. 2. A review of Department documentation revealed E1 notified the Department on January 14, 2025 that E1 would serve as "interim executive director". However, a review of the Board of Examiners for Nursing Care Institution Administrators and Assisted Living Facility Managers (NCIA Board) website revealed no managers certificate for E1. 3. The Compliance Officer observed that an assisted living facility manager certificate was not conspicuously posted in the facility during a complaint investigation conducted on February 06, 2025. 4. In a telephone interview, O1 reported O1 removed O1's license on January 8, 2024, and the facility has had no manager since. 5. In an interview, E3 and E4 reported the facility did not currently have a certified manager. E3 and E4 acknowledged the facility did not designate in writing a manager who either had a certificate as an assisted living facility manager issued under A.R.S. \'a7 36-446.04(C), or a temporary certificate as an assisted living facility manager issued under A.R.S. \'a7 36-446.06.

Nov 22, 2024Complaint

An on-site investigation of complaints AZ00217436, AZ00218673, AZ00218966, and AZ00218983 was conducted on November 22, 2024, and November 25, 2024, and the following deficiencies were cited :

If an assisted living facility provides medication administration, a manager shall ensure that:R9-10-816.B.3.b

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure medication administered to a resident was administered in compliance with a medication order, for three of four sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a risk if a resident experienced a change in condition due to improper administration of medication. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a current service plan which indicated R1 was to receive medication administration. The review revealed a medication order for "mesalamine PO 400 mg...2 caps twice daily" and "rivastigmine patch transdermal 9.5 mg...apply 1 patch daily"dated July 8, 2024. The review further revealed two medication administration records (MARs) dated September 2024 and October 2024. The MARS revealed the following: - R1 did not receive R1's second dose of mesalamine on September 11-12, 2024, due to the "Medication not [being] available;" - R1 did not receive R1's rivastigmine on October 25 and 28-30, 2024, due to the "Medication not [being] available;"and - R1 received ciclopirox 8% solution nearly every day between September 1, 2024, and November 21, 2024, without a medication order. 2. A review of R3's medical record revealed a current service plan which indicated R3 was to receive medication administration. The review revealed a medication order for "HYDROCORTISONE 1 % CREAM APPLY TOPICALLY TWICE DAILY" with a start date of January 12, 2023. The review further revealed a MAR dated November 2024 which indicated R3 did not receive R3's first dose of hydrocortisone cream on November 1 and 21, 2024. 3. A review of R4's medical record revealed a current service plan which indicated R4 was to receive medication administration. The review revealed medication orders for "levetiracetam (500mg/5mL) 10mL BID PO" dated March 4, 2024, and "Atenolol 25 mg Tab TAKE 1 TABLET BY MOUTH EVERY NIGHT AT BEDTIME" dated October 11, 2024. The review further revealed MARs dated September-November 2024. The MARS revealed the following: - R4 did not receive R4's first dose of levetiracetam on September 21, 2024, due to the "Medication not [being] available;" - R4 did not receive R4's second dose of levetiracetam on September 20-21, 2024, due to the "Medication not [being] available;" - R4 did not receive R4's atenolol on October 29 and 31, 2024, due to the "Medication not [being] available;"and - R4 did not receive R4's atenolol on November 17-18, 2024. 4. In an interview, E2 reported having an order to hold R4's atenolol on November 17-18, 2024. 5. A review of R4's medical record revealed an order to hold R4's atenolol on November 17-18, 2024, "due to pharmacy issue." However, the order was dated November 23, 2024, the day after the first day of the inspection and several days after the medication was not administered. 6. In an interview, E1 acknowledged medication administered to R1, R3, and R4 were not administered in compliance with the corresponding medication orders. This is an uncorrected citation

A manager shall ensure that:R9-10-819.A.3.a

Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure garbage and refuse were stored in covered containers. The deficient practice posed a risk to the health and safety of the residents as an uncovered garbage container can lead to the possibility of infection. Findings include: 1. During the environmental inspections of the facility conducted on November 22, 2024, and November 25, 2024, the Compliance Officer observed garbage in uncovered containers lined with plastic bags in R4's bedroom, in an upstairs conference room, and in an upstairs common bathroom. 2. In an interview, E1 reported the containers should have had covers. Technical assistance was provided on this rule during the complaint and compliance inspection conducted on August 5-6, 2024.

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call