Morningside House of Fredericksburg
Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight compassionate and attentive nursing staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 107 Google reviews
Watch Morningside House of Fredericksburg
Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.
We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
What this means for your family
This facility is an excellent choice for families seeking high-quality, compassionate memory care and a seamless transition process. However, you should investigate the management culture and staffing consistency, as some past feedback suggests issues with administrative respect and responsiveness.
Google Reviews
Google Reviews
107 reviews on Google“Morningside House (often referred to as Poet's Walk in reviews) is highly regarded for its compassionate, professional staff and its ability to provide a warm, home-like environment for memory care residents. While most families praise the seamless transition process and attentive care, some concerns have been raised regarding management's treatment of staff and perceived high pricing.”
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
- Compassionate and attentive nursing staff
- Seamless move-in and transition process
- Specialized and dignified memory care
- Clean and well-maintained facility
- Engaging resident activity programs
Concerns
- Management and staff treatment issues (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
- High cost relative to services provided
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 31 analyzed
How They Respond to Reviews
This facility actively engages with reviewer feedback.
Questions for Your Tour
- 1It is wonderful to see how much care you put into responding to feedback from families; how does that culture of communication extend to the daily interactions between staff and residents?
- 2Since the facility is known for such engaging activity programs, could you walk us through a typical weekly schedule for a resident in assisted living?
- 3We are looking for a place where the transition feels seamless; what specific steps do you take to help a new resident settle in during their first week?
- 4With your specialized memory care certification, how do you ensure that residents maintain their dignity and sense of self during their daily routines?
- 5How does the nursing team manage medical needs or unexpected emergencies during the overnight hours?
- 6We want to ensure long-term stability for our loved one; how does management work to maintain consistent, high-quality care and staff continuity?
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The staff here is not only professional but also incredibly compassionate. They took the time to really really get to know my grandmother—her routines, her preferences, and even the little things that make her smile.”
“The environment is warm and welcoming—it looks and feels like a real home, not a sterile facility. Everything is always spotless and well-kept, and there’s a calm, peaceful atmosphere throughout.”
“We are really happy we chose this place for my mother. Kind, compassionate and caring. And when it came time to transition to a Medicaid bed the did all the transportation, packing and transfer.”
State Inspection History
State Inspections
Source: VA State Licensing Agency
Jun 26, 2028Routine
Type of inspection: Renewal Date of inspection and time the licensing inspector was on-site at the facility for each day of the inspection: 6/26/2025 9:30 A.M. ? 6:50 P.M. The Acknowledgement of Inspection form was signed and left at the facility for each date of the inspection. Number of residents present at the facility at the beginning of the inspection: 49 The licensing inspector completed a tour of the physical plant that included the building and grounds of the facility. Number of resident records reviewed: 6 Number of staff records reviewed: 3 Number of interviews conducted with residents: 0 Number of interviews conducted with staff: 3 Observations by licensing inspector: Building and grounds, dining services, activities, and medication administration observation. Additional Comments/Discussion: N/A An exit meeting will be conducted to review the inspection findings. The evidence gathered during the inspection determined non-compliance with applicable standard(s) or law, and violation(s) were documented on the violation notice issued to the facility. The licensee has the opportunity to submit a plan of correction to indicate how the cited violation(s) will be addressed in order to return the facility to compliance and maintain future compliance with applicable standard(s) or law. If the licensee wishes to provide a plan of correction: (i) type the plan on a separate Word document, (ii) identify the standard violation number being addressed, (iii) include the date the violation will be corrected, (IV) do not include any names or confidential information, and (V) return to the licensing inspector by email within five (5) business days of the exit interview. Compliance with all applicable regulations and law shall be maintained and any areas of noncompliance must be corrected. Within 15 calendar days of your receipt of the inspection findings (inspection summary, violation notice, and supplemental information), you may request a review and discussion of these findings with the inspector's immediate supervisor. To make a request for review and discussion, you must contact the licensing supervisor at the regional licensing office that serves your geographical area. Regardless of whether a supervisory review has been requested, the results of the inspection will be posted to the DSS public website within 5 business days of your receipt of the Inspection Summary and/ or Violation Notice. The department's inspection findings are subject to public disclosure. Please Note: A copy of the findings of the most recent inspection are required to be posted on the premises of the facility. For more information about the VDSS Licensing Programs, please visit: www.dss.virginia.gov Should you have any questions, please contact Jeff Marnien, Licensing Inspector at (540) 571-0189 or by email at Jeffrey.marnien@dss.virginia.gov
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure prior to admission to a safe, secure environment, the resident was assessed by an independent clinical psychologist licensed to practice in the Commonwealth, or by an independent physician, as having a serious cognitive impairment due to a primary psychiatric diagnosis of dementia, with an inability to recognize danger or protect his own safety and welfare. Evidence: 1. The LI conducted a record review on 6/26/2025 of resident 2?s chart, admitted 6/18/2025. The LI observed the chart did not contain an assessment by a psychiatrist or physician that assessed the resident?s cognitive function, thought and perception, mood, behavior/psychomotor, speech, and appearance. 2. During an interview with staff 4 on 6/26/2025, staff 4 confirmed resident 2?s chart did not contain the required assessment according to the standards.
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure prior to admitting a resident with a serious cognitive impairment due to a primary psychiatric diagnosis of dementia to a safe, secure environment, the licensee, administrator, or designee determined whether placement in the special care unit was appropriate. The determination must be in writing and retained in the resident?s chart. Evidence: 1. The LI conducted a record review on 6/26/2025 of resident 2?s chart, admitted 6/18/2025. The LI observed the chart did not contain a written determination and justification. 2. During an interview with staff 4 on 6/26/2025, staff 4 confirmed resident 2?s chart did not contain the required written determination and justification.
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure within four months of the starting date of employment in the safe, secure environment, direct care staff attended at least 10 hours of training in cognitive impairment. Evidence: 1. During a record review on 6/26/2025, the LI observed staff 1, hired 2/27/2025, did not have 10 hours of cognitive impairment training within four months of their hire date. 2. Staff 4 confirmed staff 1 did not have the required 10 hours of cognitive impairment training within four months of their hire date.
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure direct care staff were first aid certified. Evidence: 1. During record review on 6/26/2025, the LI observed that staff 1, a direct care aide (DCA), hired 2/27/2025, did not have a record of being first aid certified in their employee file. 2. During an interview with staff 4 on 6/26/2025, staff 4 confirmed staff 1 did not have a current first aide certification.
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were not locked out of their rooms. Evidence: 1. During the initial tour of the building on 6/26/2025 with staff 4, the LI observed all resident rooms were locked in the building. 2. During the tour of the building, the LI interviewed Staff 4, who confirmed that the resident rooms were locked and that residents needed to request access to their room. Alternatively, staff would assist residents to their room if they observed the resident was tired and needed to lie down.
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure as needed ( PRN
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a record of required fire and emergency evacuation drills recorded all nine elements of this subsection. Evidence: 1. During a record review on 6/26/2025, the Licensing Inspector (LI) observed that the fire drill conducted on 3/16/2025 did not include two of the nine required data elements: the method used for notification of the drill and any problems encountered. 2. During an interview with staff 4 on 6/26/2025, staff 4 confirmed the fire drill records did not include all the required elements of this subsection.
Mar 23, 2026RoutineCleanReport
Type of inspection: Monitoring Date(s) of inspection and time the licensing inspector was on-site at the facility for each day of the inspection: 03/23/2026 Time in: 12:41 PM Time out: 2:10 PM The Acknowledgement of Inspection form was signed and left at the facility for each date of the inspection. A self-reported incident was received by VDSS Division of Licensing on 12/26/2025 regarding allegations in the area(s) of: Personnel and Resident Care and Related Services Number of residents present at the facility at the beginning of the inspection: 45 The licensing inspector completed a tour of the physical plant that included the building and grounds of the facility. Number of resident records reviewed: 1 Number of staff records reviewed: 0 Number of interviews conducted with residents: 0 Number of interviews conducted with staff: 1 Observations by licensing inspector: Licensing inspector observed residents interacting with peers and staff, dining for lunch, participating in scheduled activities, and walking the hallways. Additional Comments/Discussion: An exit meeting will be conducted to review the inspection findings. The evidence gathered during the investigation did not support the self-report of non-compliance with standard(s) or law. The inspection summary will be posted to the VDSS website within 5 business days of your receipt of the inspection summary. The department's inspection findings are subject to public disclosure. Please Note: A copy of the findings of the most recent inspection are required to be posted on the premises of the facility. For more information about the VDSS Licensing Programs, please visit: www.dss.virginia.gov Should you have any questions, please contact Nina Wilson, Licensing Inspector at (703) 635-6074 or by email at nina.wilson@dss.virginia.gov
Mar 23, 2026ComplaintCleanReport
Type of inspection: Complaint Date(s) of inspection and time the licensing inspector was on-site at the facility for each day of the inspection: 03/23/2026 Time in: 12:01 PM Time out: 12:40 PM The Acknowledgement of Inspection form was signed and left at the facility for each date of the inspection. A complaint was received by VDSS Division of Licensing on 08/30/2025 regarding allegations in the area(s) of: Resident Care and Related Services and Complaint Investigation Number of residents present at the facility at the beginning of the inspection: 45 The licensing inspector completed a tour of the physical plant that included the building and grounds of the facility. Number of resident records reviewed: 2 Number of staff records reviewed: 0 Number of interviews conducted with residents: 0 Number of interviews conducted with staff: 2 Observations by licensing inspector: Licensing inspector observed residents interacting with peers and staff, dining for lunch, participating in scheduled activities, and walking the hallways. Additional Comments/Discussion: An exit meeting will be conducted to review the inspection findings. The evidence gathered during the investigation did not support the self-report of non-compliance with standard(s) or law. The inspection summary will be posted to the VDSS website within 5 business days of your receipt of the inspection summary. The department's inspection findings are subject to public disclosure. Please Note: A copy of the findings of the most recent inspection are required to be posted on the premises of the facility. For more information about the VDSS Licensing Programs, please visit: www.dss.virginia.gov Should you have any questions, please contact Nina Wilson, Licensing Inspector at (703) 635-6074 or by email at nina.wilson@dss.virginia.gov
Jul 8, 2025ComplaintCleanReport
Type of inspection: Complaint Date of inspection and time the licensing inspector was on-site at the facility for each day of the inspection: 7/8/2025 2:45 P.M. ? 4:00 P.M. The Acknowledgement of Inspection form was signed and left at the facility for each date of the inspection. A complaint was received by VDSS Division of Licensing on 4/30/2025 regarding allegations in the area(s) of: resident care Number of residents present at the facility at the beginning of the inspection: 49 The licensing inspector completed a tour of the physical plant that included the building and grounds of the facility. Number of resident records reviewed: 1 Number of staff records reviewed: 0 Number of interviews conducted with residents: 0 Number of interviews conducted with staff: 2 Observations by licensing inspector: Building and grounds. Additional Comments/Discussion: n/a An exit meeting will be conducted to review the inspection findings. The evidence gathered during the investigation did not support the allegation(s) of non-compliance with standard(s) or law. The inspection summary will be posted to the VDSS website within 5 business days of your receipt of the inspection summary. The department's inspection findings are subject to public disclosure. Please Note: A copy of the findings of the most recent inspection are required to be posted on the premises of the facility. For more information about the VDSS Licensing Programs, please visit: www.dss.virginia.gov Should you have any questions, please contact Jeff Marnien, Licensing Inspector at (540) 571-0189 or by email at Jeffrey.marnien@dss.virginia.gov
Sep 16, 2024Complaint
Type of inspection: Complaint Date of inspection and time the licensing inspector was on-site at the facility for each day of the inspection: 9/16/2024 9:00 a.m. ? 4:20 p.m.; 10/21/2024 10:10 a.m. ? 2:00 p.m. The Acknowledgement of Inspection form was signed and left at the facility for each date of the inspection. A complaint was received by VDSS Division of Licensing on 9/6/2024 regarding allegations in the area(s) of: Resident Care Number of residents present at the facility at the beginning of the inspection: 50 The licensing inspector completed a tour of the physical plant that included the building and grounds of the facility. Number of resident records reviewed: 1 Number of staff records reviewed: 0 Number of interviews conducted with residents: 0 Number of interviews conducted with staff: 4 Observations by licensing inspector: Activity being provided to the residents, meal being served. Additional Comments/Discussion: N/A An exit meeting will be conducted to review the inspection findings. The evidence gathered during the investigation supported some, but not all of the allegation(s); area(s) of non-compliance with standard(s) or law were: incident reports, physician orders, individualized service plan, facility policies and procedures, resident care. A violation notice was issued; any violation(s) not related to the complaint but identified during the course of the investigation can also be found on the violation notice. The licensee has the opportunity to submit a plan of correction to indicate how the cited violation(s) will be addressed in order to return the facility to compliance and maintain future compliance with applicable standard(s) or law. If the licensee wishes to provide a plan of correction: (i) type the plan on a separate Word document, (ii) identify the standard violation number being addressed, (iii) include the date the violation will be corrected, (IV) do not include any names or confidential information, and (V) return to the licensing inspector by email within five (5) business days of the exit interview. Compliance with all applicable regulations and law shall be maintained and any areas of noncompliance must be corrected. Within 15 calendar days of your receipt of the inspection findings (inspection summary, violation notice, and supplemental information), you may request a review and discussion of these findings with the inspector's immediate supervisor. To make a request for review and discussion, you must contact the licensing supervisor at the regional licensing office that serves your geographical area. Regardless of whether a supervisory review has been requested, the results of the inspection will be posted to the DSS public website within 5 business days of your receipt of the Inspection Summary and/ or Violation Notice. The department's inspection findings are subject to public disclosure. Please Note: A copy of the findings of the most recent inspection are required to be posted on the premises of the facility. For more information about the VDSS Licensing Programs, please visit: www.dss.virginia.gov Should you have any questions, please contact Jeff Marnien, Licensing Inspector at (540) 571-0189 or by email at Jeffrey.marnien@dss.virginia.gov
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure compliance with the facility's own policies and procedures. Evidence: 1.LI requested the facilities skin assessment policies and procedures. 2. The Resident Care Skin Assessment Policy 244 provided by staff 1 stated the director of health and wellness (DHW) or designee will evaluate a resident on or before move-in to the community in an effort to decrease the incidence of skin breakdown with procedure six specifying the DHW or designee was responsible for documenting on the skin assessment form (Mem Form 244A) for any area of skin breakdown. 3. LI requested documentation of the completed skin assessment. 4. On 9/16/2024, staff 1 stated the skin assessment, which was to be completed on or before move-in, along with Form 244A (assessment after skin breakdown), were not completed.
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to report to the regional licensing office within 24 hours any major incident that negatively affected or threatened the life, health, safety, or welfare of any resident. Evidence: 1. Licensing Inspector (LI) conducted a review of resident 1?s record (date of admission 6/7/2024) and noted a physician?s order dated 6/27/2024 for evaluation and treatment of open area on coccyx. 2. On 9/16/2024, LI asked staff 1 for the self-report for resident 1?s wound. 3. Communication log dated 7/1/2024 noted bruising to resident 1?s left rib cage area with x-ray ordered by the physician. 4. On 9/16/2024, LI interviewed staff 1 who stated the self-report was not sent for either incident to the regional licensing office.
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Uniform Assessment Instrument ( UAI
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to update the Individualized Service Plan ( ISP
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide services to prevent clinically avoidable complications. Evidence: 1. Resident 1?s weight prior to admission (admitted 6/7/2024) was documented on the physical examination (5/29/2024) to be 140 lbs. 2. The resident?s weight was not checked and documented by the facility upon admission or through the month of June 2024. Staff 4 stated they made a mistake by not recording resident 1?s weight on admission. 3. On 7/1/2024, resident 1?s weight was recorded at 104.4lbs. There were no interventions indicated in resident 1?s record until a six-month dietary review was conducted on 7/22/2024. On 7/28/2024 re-admission weight from the hospital was recorded at 104.4 lbs. 4. Eight total entries in the communication log referenced resident 1?s meal intake. On the following eight entries, resident 1 was recorded to have eaten 25% or less: 6/10/2024, 6/26/2024, 7/5/2024, 7/14/2024, 7/29/2024, and 7/30/2024. 5. Home health nursing documented providing skilled wound care on 7/10/2024, 7/16/2024, 7/19/2024, 7/22/2024, and 8/2/2024 to an open area on the sacrum. Home health physical therapy documented therapy visits on 7/17/2024 and 8/1/2024 with home health speech therapy completing an evaluation on 7/18/2024. 6. Following the home health visits, the facility failed to document any follow-up after the physical therapy visit on 7/17/2024, speech therapy evaluation/visit on 7/18/2024, or the physical therapy visit on 8/1/2024.
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement interventions as soon as a nutritional problem was suspected. Evidence: 1. Resident 1?s (admitted 6/7/2024) weight on the pre-admission physical examination (dated 5/29/2024) was 140 lbs. 2. Initial ISP
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure treatments ordered by a physician or other prescriber were documented and provided according to instructions. Evidence: 1. A physician?s order was received on 6/27/2024 for home health to evaluate and treat the open area on resident 1?s coccyx. 2. A skilled nursing (SN) home health evaluation completed on 7/10/2024 noted a sacral wound along with a newly identified wound on the left hip. Home health instructed facility to perform wound care in the absence of the skilled nurse and as needed (prn) if wound dressing was saturated. The SN documented facility staff were able to teach back dressing care at 100%. Facility failed to document follow up on the recommendations made by SN. 3. The physician order sheet (POS) signed on 7/27/2024 did not include treatment of the open area on the sacrum that had previously been identified on both the physician referral dated 6/27/2024 and the home health order dated 7/10/2024. 4. On 9/16/2024, LI reviewed documentation with staff 1 who acknowledged the order dated 6/27/2024 stated, ?Home Health eval and treat for open area to coccyx? was not included on the POS. 5. Physical Therapy (PT) Home Health visit, completed on 7/17/2024, provided instruction on the prevention of pressure ulcers through positioning and offloading techniques to reduce pressure on the wound. The physical therapist documented that the caregiver verbalized and demonstrated strategies to improve mobility related to transfers and ambulation. On 8/1/2024, PT educated caregivers on proper positioning when lying in bed along with frequent position changes to assist in healing of current pressure ulcers and to reduce the risk for developing new pressure ulcers. However, the facility failed to document any follow-up on the recommendations made after the visit. 6. A speech therapy evaluation/visit was completed on 7/18/2024 and documented educating caregivers on therapeutic exercises during the visit to include safe swallow strategies, taking single bites, and upright positioning during meals. However, the facility failed to document any follow-up on the recommendations made after the ST visit. 7. The treatment administration record (TAR) did not include a place for facility staff to document treatment of the open area on the sacrum. Progress notes did not include documentation of following up on PT or ST recommendations. 8. Physician order dated 6/5/2024 indicated to check resident 1?s weight monthly. Facility failed to log resident weight on the TAR in June 2024. On 10/16/2024, Staff 4 confirmed that the facility did not weigh resident 1 upon admission; instead, they documented the weight from the admitting history and physical conducted by the physician on 5/29/2024.
Jul 26, 2024Routine
Type of inspection: Renewal Date of inspection and time the licensing inspector was on-site at the facility for each day of the inspection: 7/26/2024 8:30am ? 5:00pm The Acknowledgement of Inspection form was signed and left at the facility for each date of the inspection. Number of residents present at the facility at the beginning of the inspection: 51 The licensing inspector completed a tour of the physical plant that included the building and grounds of the facility. Number of resident records reviewed: 6 Number of staff records reviewed: 3 Number of interviews conducted with residents: n/a Number of interviews conducted with staff: 3 Observations by licensing inspector: Observed activities, breakfast meal, medication pass, building and grounds, Additional Comments/Discussion: n/a An exit meeting will be conducted to review the inspection findings. The evidence gathered during the inspection determined non-compliance with applicable standard(s) or law, and violation(s) were documented on the violation notice issued to the facility. The licensee has the opportunity to submit a plan of correction to indicate how the cited violation(s) will be addressed in order to return the facility to compliance and maintain future compliance with applicable standard(s) or law. If the licensee wishes to provide a plan of correction: (i) type the plan on a separate Word document, (ii) identify the standard violation number being addressed, (iii) include the date the violation will be corrected, (IV) do not include any names or confidential information, and (V) return to the licensing inspector by email within five (5) business days of the exit interview. Compliance with all applicable regulations and law shall be maintained and any areas of noncompliance must be corrected. Within 15 calendar days of your receipt of the inspection findings (inspection summary, violation notice, and supplemental information), you may request a review and discussion of these findings with the inspector's immediate supervisor. To make a request for review and discussion, you must contact the licensing supervisor at the regional licensing office that serves your geographical area. Regardless of whether a supervisory review has been requested, the results of the inspection will be posted to the DSS public website within 5 business days of your receipt of the Inspection Summary and/ or Violation Notice. The department's inspection findings are subject to public disclosure. Please Note: A copy of the findings of the most recent inspection are required to be posted on the premises of the facility. For more information about the VDSS Licensing Programs, please visit: www.dss.virginia.gov Should you have any questions, please contact (Jeff Marnien), Licensing Inspector at (540) 571-0189 or by email at Jeffrey.marnien@dss.virginia.gov Violation Notice Issued: Yes
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure at least 21 hours of scheduled activities were available to the residents. Evidence: 1. The July 2024 activity calendar did not document 21 hours of resident activities per week. 2. Staff 2 confirmed the number of hours was not posted on the activity calendar demonstrating at least 21 hours of activities were scheduled per week. 3. Photo evidence taken.
Based on observations, the facility failed to ensure menu substitutions or additions was recorded on the posted menu. Evidence: 1. During tour of the facility on 7/29/2024 the licensing staff observed the breakfast meal which included eggs, sausage, and toast with jelly. 2. The posted menu included eggs, sausage, French toast, and grits. 3. The posted menu was not updated with the toast with jelly substitution.
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that medications ordered for PRN
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the first aid kits were checked at least monthly to ensure that all items are present and items with expiration dates are not past their expiration date. Evidence: 1. The LI observed the first aid kit, located in the Wellness Office, did not include a blanket, tweezers, hand sanitizer, scissors, and triangle bandage. 2. Staff 4 acknowledged the first aid kit was missing items.
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the availability of a 96-hour supply of emergency food and drinking water and that at least 48 hours of the supply must be on site at any given time. Evidence: 1. During tour of the facility on 7/26/2024 the LI observed 48 ? 8oz. bottles. 2. Staff 1 acknowledged that 48 hours of emergency water was not in stock.
Jan 29, 2024RoutineCleanReport
Date of Inspection: January 29, 2024 Type of Inspection: Initial Inspection If you have any questions or email changes, please do not hesitate to contact me at laura.lunceford@dss.virginia.gov. If you need a copy of any of the DSS Model forms or to review any inspection or regulation, you can find the information on the internet: www.dss.virginia.gov. Census 55 The Licensing conducted an announced initial inspection. The Licensing Inspector walked the physical plant., verified window and room measurements, reviewed policies and procedures. The building, fire and health inspections have been submitted and reviewed. No violations were cited and an exit interview held.
Contact
Get in Touch
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
References & Resources
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
107 reviews from families & visitors
Medicare data downloads
Original nursing home datasets
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Nearby Alternatives
Spring Arbor of Fredericksburg
< 1 miAssisted Living · Fredericksburg, VA
Spring Arbor Cottage of Fredericksburg
< 1 miAssisted Living · Fredericksburg, VA
Fredericksburg Assisted Living
1.7 miAssisted Living · Fredericksburg, VA
Fredericksburg Health and Rehab
1.8 miNursing Home · Fredericksburg, VA
Charter Senior Living of Fredericksburg
2.3 miAssisted Living · Fredericksburg, VA
Carriage Hill Health & Rehab Center
2.5 miNursing Home · Fredericksburg, VA