Public Google reviewers rate this highly and often mention warm and welcoming home-like environment. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 64 Google reviews
Email Maidencreek Place to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Public Google reviewers rate Maidencreek Place highly. Reviewers highlight: warm and welcoming home-like environment, attentive and compassionate care staff. Reviewer identity is not verified, and online reviews may not capture everything. Schedule a visit to assess the fit directly.
Maidencreek Place is highly regarded for its warm, home-like atmosphere and a staff that many families describe as compassionate and attentive. While most recent reviews praise the dining services and engaging activities, older reviews contain serious allegations regarding pest control and medication errors that should be verified.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 33 analyzed
This facility rarely responds to reviews.
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The staff is kind and caring, the food is very good and there are many activities for residents including those in wheelchairs. They will provide care for various levels of need and respond quickly when called.”
“The dietary department's freshly baked cookies, maintenance's cleaning and tidying, nurses' warmth, and concierge's friendly greetings all contribute to a welcoming environment.”
“My mom has been there a few years now and likes the smaller size of the facility which feels more homey. She has made some good friends with other residents. The staff have always been super helpful and pleasant.”
Source: PA State Licensing Agency
Key Findings
Between 2021 and 2025, Maidencreek Place underwent 34 inspections, resulting in 11 clean reports and 55 recorded violations. Documented findings include issues regarding fire safety protocols, incident reporting delays, and lapses in resident privacy and staff conduct.
During a fire drill, the evacuation time was 8 minutes and 6 seconds, exceeding the facility's required 8-minute limit.
The medication administration record for a resident prescribed sliding scale insulin did not indicate the specific number of insulin units administered.
A resident glucometer was not calibrated to the current date and time, and there were discrepancies between glucometer readings and the Medication Administration Record (MAR).
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
Fire drill records were incorrectly documented, including recording educational training as full drills and inaccurate alarm status.
The home failed to report incidents to the department when the fire alarm company dispatched the fire department to the home.
Unannounced fire drills were not conducted during the months of May, June, and July 2025.
The fire alarm was reported as disabled by the home during a fire drill.
Staff Member A did not complete a fire safety and emergency preparedness orientation on or before their first day of work.
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
The administrator or designee failed to provide requested witness statements to Department agents during the investigation.
An incident involving a verbal and physical altercation between staff was not reported to the Department within the required 24-hour timeframe.
Residents were not treated with dignity and respect due to a verbal and physical altercation between staff members in a resident's room.
A resident's support plan incorrectly stated they used bilateral hearing aids, which the resident denied and staff were unaware of.
Staff members were identified as Med Techs without documented required Medication Administration Training, observations, or up-to-date training records.
The facility failed to follow prescriber orders for a resident's medication hold parameter and lacked recorded blood pressure readings to verify appropriate administration.
A direct care staff member's personnel file did not contain a required PA background check meeting OAPSA requirements.
The home lacked documentation verifying that a direct care staff member possessed a high school diploma or GED.
Direct care staff members had not received required annual training in topics including dementia care, infection control, and safe management techniques.
The home lacks a policy outlining the use of bedside mobility devices for residents using bed enablers.
Reading Aid II Opco LLC
for profit
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Keystone Villa at Fleetwood
2.5 miAssisted Living · Blandon, PA
Laureldale Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Cent
3.3 miNursing Home · Laureldale, PA
Laurel Pointe Senior Living
4.2 miAssisted Living · Reading, PA
Grand View Manor
4.9 miAssisted Living · Fleetwood, PA
Berks Leisure Living
5.1 miAssisted Living · Leesport, PA
Country Meadows of Wyomissing II
6.5 miAssisted Living · Wyomissing, PA