See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Assisted Living

Emerald Groves Central

Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight compassionate and caring staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.

2759 North Val Vista Drive, Mesa, AZ 85213Licensed & Active
Google rating
4.5/5

based on 11 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1

Watch Emerald Groves Central

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

This facility is an excellent choice for residents needing hospice or end-of-life care due to their exceptionally compassionate staff. However, if your loved one has a progressive condition like ALS, you must have a transparent conversation with management regarding their policy on changing care needs and potential residency termination.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

11 reviews analyzed
Emerald Groves Central is highly regarded by families for its compassionate, person-centered care, particularly for residents receiving hospice or end-of-life support. While many praise the attentive staff and beautiful environment, one critical review highlights a significant failure in managing residents with degenerative diseases like ALS, leading to residency termination.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food5.0Staff10.0CleanN/AActivities9.0MedsN/AMemoryN/AComms4.0Value3.0

Strengths

  • Compassionate and caring staff
  • Excellent hospice and end-of-life care
  • Beautifully decorated and well-maintained grounds
  • Low staff turnover

Concerns

  • Inability to accommodate residents with progressive/degenerative diseases
  • Unexpected additional fees during registration

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

2345.02020(1)4.02021(2)5.02022(1)5.02023(2)4.22025(5)

Distribution

5
9
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
1

How They Respond to Reviews

0%response rate

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1We've heard wonderful things about how compassionate and caring the staff is here; how do you foster that culture of kindness among your team?
  • 2The grounds look absolutely beautiful; what kind of outdoor activities or strolls are available for residents to enjoy the scenery?
  • 3Since we are looking at long-term care, how does the facility support residents if they experience changes in their physical or cognitive abilities over time?
  • 4Can you walk us through the process of how the facility communicates important updates or changes in care to family members?
  • 5Could you provide a clear breakdown of the monthly costs and let us know if there are any common additional fees we should prepare for?
  • 6In the event of a medical emergency during the night, what is the specific protocol for getting immediate care for a resident?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

The staff was so caring, with many taking extra time to care for him or just talk and watch old cowboy shows. Many Hospice nurses said he was in the very best place to be.

Long-term resident's family · 2025★★★★★

The attention to details by the owners, Jennifer and Patrick, the beautiful decorations we all so loved, the fun activities and musical guests, the low turnover of staff, the constant attention to adjusting her care needs as they progressed, and the genuine care and love she received were truly

Long-term resident's family · 2025★★★★★

We brought my mom here for hospice care. She spent the last few months of her decade long battle with cancer being cared for by the kindest most loving staff I could have imagined.

Hospice patient's family · 2021★★★★★
Source: 11 Google reviews

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: AZ State Licensing Agency

4total
7deficiencies
Mar 4, 2026Complaint

The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection and investigation of complaint 00158823, conducted on March 4, 2026:

Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge documentA.R.S. § 36-420.04.CCorrected Mar 4, 2026

Based on record review and interview, the assisted living center failed to maintain a standardized form for each resident that includes the information prescribed in A.R.S. § 36-420.04.A.1-9 for three out of three residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was not prepared in case of an emergency. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed there was a standardized form to be used if an emergency responder was contacted, however, the form was missing the following information: The point-of-contact information for the assisted living center or assisted living home, as well as the telephone number, if available, cell phone number and email address; Whether the resident received medication services; and Basic information about the resident's physical and mental conditions and basic medical history. 2. A review of R2's medical record revealed there was a standardized form to be used if an emergency responder was contacted, however, the form was missing the following information: The name, address and telephone number of the resident's current pharmacy. The point-of-contact information for the assisted living center or assisted living home, as well as the telephone number, if available, cell phone number and email address; A copy of the resident's advance directives, if any, on file at the assisted living center or assisted living home; Whether the resident received medication services; and Basic information about the resident's physical and mental conditions and basic medical history. 3. A review of R3's medical record revealed there was a standardized form to be used if an emergency responder was contacted, however, the form was missing the following information: The point-of-contact information for the assisted living center or assisted living home, as well as the telephone number, if available, cell phone number and email address; and Whether the resident received medication services. 4. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E4 and no additional information was provided.

AdministrationR9-10-803.A.10Corrected Apr 1, 2026

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that the health, safety, or welfare of a resident was not placed at risk of harm. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a document titled "Incident Report" dated February 6, 2026, at 9:50 pm. This report stated, "...While transporting [R1] to bed on the Hoyer lift, the lift tripped in the carpet and fell on the floor causing [R1] hit [R1's] head on the bed...[R1] was transported to Banner Baywood...". 2. In an interview, E1 reported the caregiver attempted to move R1 but was unable to safely transport them using the Hoyer lift. This resulted in R1 falling down and needing hospitalization. R1 was sent home afterwards with stitches. 3. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided.

a-d. Emergency and Safety StandardsR9-10-819.A.1.a-dCorrected Apr 1, 2026

Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a disaster plan included when and where residents would be relocated during a disaster. The deficient practice posed a risk as there was no plan to ensure the health and safety of residents in an emergency. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility’s documentation/policies and procedures revealed a disaster plan for the facility, however, the disaster plan did not include where and how residents would be relocated. 2. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E4 and no additional information was provided.

Emergency and Safety StandardsR9-10-819.A.4Corrected Mar 5, 2026

Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a disaster drill for employees was conducted on each shift at least once every three months and documented. The deficient practice posed a risk if employees were unable to implement a disaster plan. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility's documentation records revealed a disaster drill conducted on October 9, 2025. A disaster drill after October 9, 2025, was not available for review. 2. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E4 and no additional information was provided.

a-c. Environmental StandardsR9-10-820.A.14.a-cCorrected Mar 4, 2026

Based on observation, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that if pets or animals were allowed in the assisted living facility, pets or animals were licensed consistent with local ordinances. Findings include: 1. In an interview, E4 acknowledged a dog was currently living at the facility. 2. A review of the dog's record revealed no documentation of a current license with Maricopa County. 3. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E4 and no additional information was provided.

Nov 21, 2025Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaints 00151057 and 00143439 conducted on November 21, 2025.

Jan 9, 2025Routine
CleanReport

No deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection conducted on January 9, 2025.

Jul 17, 2023Complaint

An on-site investigation of complaint AZ00194646 was conducted on July 17, 2023 and the following deficiencies were cited:

A manager shall ensure that:R9-10-806.A.1.b.iCorrected Jul 17, 2023

Based on observation, record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver provided documentation of completion of a caregiver training program approved by the Department or the Board of Examiners for Nursing Care Institution Administrators and Assisted Living Facility Managers, for one individual hired as a caregiver. The deficient practice posed a risk if E2 was not qualified to provide the required services. Findings include: 1. The Compliance Officer observed E1 and E2 working at the facility upon arrival at 8:20 AM. 2. A review of E2's (hired in 2021) personnel record revealed E2 was hired as a caregiver. The record revealed a caregiver certificate (dated May 15, 2012) from "Platinum Training Services LLC...ALTP0185." 3. A review of https://nciaboard.az.gov/news/caregiver-certificate-verification website revealed the caregiver training program "ALTP #185" was valid from July 16, 2012 through August 2, 2013. 4. A review of https://nciaboard.az.gov/news/fraudulent-caregiver-certificates revealed E2 had not completed a caregiver training program. 5. In an interview, E2 reported E2 completed caregiver training at an assisted living facility E2 worked at previously. 6. In a joint interview, E3 and E4 acknowledged E2 did not provide documentation of completion of a caregiver training program approved by the Department or the Board of Examiners for Nursing Care Institution Administrators and Assisted Living Facility Managers.

A manager shall ensure that:R9-10-806.A.5.a-cCorrected Jul 17, 2023

Based on observation, record review, documentation review, and interview, the administrator failed to ensure sufficient personnel members were present on a behavioral health residential facility's premises with the qualifications, experience, skills, and knowledge necessary to meet the needs of a resident, and ensure the health and safety of a resident. The deficient practice posed a risk as a qualified personnel member was not present to meet a resident's needs and ensure the health and safety of a resident. Findings include: 1. The Compliance Officer observed E1 and E2 working at the facility upon arrival at 8:20 AM. 2. A review of E2's (hired in 2021) personnel record revealed E2 was hired as a caregiver. The record revealed a caregiver certificate (dated May 15, 2012) from "Platinum Training Services LLC...ALTP0185." 3. A review of https://nciaboard.az.gov/news/caregiver-certificate-verification website revealed the caregiver training program "ALTP #185" was valid from July 16, 2012 through August 2, 2013. 4. A review of https://nciaboard.az.gov/news/fraudulent-caregiver-certificates revealed E2 had not completed a caregiver training program. 5. In an interview, E2 reported E2 completed caregiver training at an assisted living facility E2 worked at previously. 6. In a joint interview, E3 and E4 acknowledged the assisted living facility did not have a caregiver with the qualifications, experience, skills, and knowledge necessary to meet the needs of a resident and ensure the health and safety.

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call