See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Assisted Living

Cottages of Sequim

Limited public data on Cottages of Sequim. Call, tour, and ask to meet current residents' families — your own impression matters most.

408 W Washington St, Sequim, WA 9838260 bedsLicensed & Active
Source: WA DSHS — view official record
Google rating
3.6/5

based on 9 Google reviews

Cottages of Sequim Assisted Living in Sequim, WA — Street View
Street View

Watch Cottages of Sequim

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

Cottages of Sequim is highly recommended by families for its dedicated memory care staff and safe environment. While the facility maintains a strong reputation, we advise families to schedule an in-person tour to observe staff-resident interactions firsthand, as recent online feedback is limited to brief testimonials.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

9 reviews on Google
Cottages of Sequim is highly regarded by families for its compassionate, friendly staff and the sense of safety provided to residents, particularly in memory care. While long-term residents and their families express high satisfaction with the care environment, there is a lack of recent detailed feedback, and the facility has received several empty one-star ratings that remain unexplained.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food10.0Staff10.0CleanN/AActivitiesN/AMedsN/AMemory10.0CommsN/AValueN/A

Strengths

  • Compassionate and friendly staff
  • Safe and secure environment
  • Strong administrative leadership
  • High resident satisfaction in memory care

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

2345.02017(1)1.02020(1)5.02021(1)3.02023(4)4.72026(3)

Distribution · 10 analyzed

5
6
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
3

How They Respond to Reviews

56%response rate

This facility responds to some reviews.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1It's wonderful to see how much the leadership team engages with the community; how does the administration stay involved in the day-to-day care of the residents?
  • 2We've heard such lovely things about the warmth of the staff here; how do you foster that sense of compassion during the caregiving process?
  • 3For a resident who might need more specialized support, what specific features of your memory care program help them feel secure and engaged?
  • 4What kind of daily activities or social outings are planned to help residents stay active and connected with one another?
  • 5In terms of safety, what specific protocols are in place to ensure the environment remains secure for all 60 residents?
  • 6How does the care team coordinate with outside doctors or handle medical situations if an emergency arises during the night?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

My mom has lived here since January 2024, and she is safe, well care for and happy.

Resident's family member · 2026★★★★★

This facility has the best staff ever. I have two sisters in memory care at this time. We researched many places for them. Cottages of Sequim is by far the best, safest and has th friendlyist staff.

Memory care family member · 2026★★★★★

My mom has been there as a resident for like 4 years, and they have been the BEST. My mom loves being there and going to her favorite cafeteria every day.

Long-term resident's family · 2021★★★★★
Source: 9 Google reviews

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: WA Dept. of Social & Health Services

5total
11deficiencies
May 21, 2026Fire
CleanReport

The inspection report explicitly states 'No violations were observed during this inspection.'

Feb 18, 2026Investigation

A follow-up inspection on 04/06/2026 confirmed that these deficiencies were corrected.

Resident rightsWAC 388-78A-2660Corrected Apr 4, 2026

Facility failed to ensure staff notified or consulted with the resident's physician in a timely manner regarding pressure injuries on Resident 1's heels.

Monitoring residents' well-beingWAC 388-78A-2120Corrected Apr 4, 2026

Facility failed to ensure appropriate interventions (floating heels/wearing boots) were placed in a timely manner, resulting in worsening pressure injuries for Resident 1.

Implementation of negotiated service agreementWAC 388-78A-2160Corrected Apr 4, 2026

Facility failed to ensure staff placed boots and floated Resident 1's heels as required by their negotiated service agreement.

Jun 2, 2025Fire

The inspection conducted on 04/17/2025 resulted in a 'Disapproved' status. A follow-up inspection on 06/02/2025 confirmed that all violations noted during previous related inspection(s) have been corrected.

Working Space and ClearanceIFC 603.4, 2021Corrected Jun 2, 2025

Fire alarm electrical panel room has multiple items blocking electrical panels.

Portable, Electric Space HeatersIFC 603.9 2021Corrected Jun 2, 2025

Front nurse office has a heater plugged into a power strip.

Inspection, Testing and MaintenanceIFC 907.8 2021Corrected Jun 2, 2025

Facility failed to provide annual inspection report for fire alarm system; fire alarm electrical breaker is missing breaker lock.

Extension CordsIFC 603.6 2021Corrected Jun 2, 2025

Front desk office has an extension cord plugged into a power strip.

Testing and MaintenanceIFC 903.5 2021Corrected Jun 2, 2025

Facility failed to provide documentation showing fire department connection 5-year hydrostatic test.

Oct 17, 2024Investigation

There is also a follow-up inspection letter dated 2025-01-13 confirming no deficiencies were found for WAC 388-78A-2610-1 and WAC 388-78A-2610-2-a.

Infection controlWAC 388-78A-2610Corrected Dec 1, 2024

Facility failed to ensure staff met respiratory fit testing requirements upon hire and annually for 2 of 3 staff reviewed, placing residents and staff at risk of infectious disease transmission during a COVID-19 outbreak.

Sep 11, 2024Investigation

There is a follow-up letter dated 01/13/2025 indicating no deficiencies were found during a follow-up inspection for compliance determination 53137.

Policies and proceduresWAC 388-78A-2600Corrected Oct 26, 2024

Facility failed to ensure staff implemented incident reporting policy after a resident was found on the floor; failed to report or document a fall resulting in a compression fracture.

Resident rightsWAC 388-78A-2660Corrected Oct 26, 2024

Facility failed to maintain resident dignity for 2 of 3 residents reviewed, who were frequently observed in saturated briefs/clothing and bedding.

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call