See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Nursing HomeMedicaid Top Rated

Colorado Veterans Community Living Ctr at Homelake

Strong Medicare quality ratings; families often praise high overall star ratings. Still worth an in-person visit.

3749 Sherman Ave, Monte Vista, CO 8114460 bedsLicensed & Active
Source: CO CDPHE — view official record
5/5
Medicare
Inspection
Quality
Staffing
Google rating
4.4/5

based on 8 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1
Colorado Veterans Community Living Ctr at Homelake Nursing Home in Monte Vista, CO — Street View
Street View

Watch Colorado Veterans Community Living Ctr at Homelake

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

While the facility maintains a high average star rating, much of the positive feedback is non-descriptive. If you choose this facility, you should specifically ask for protocols regarding the protection of residents' personal property and how they manage residents' personal funds.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

8 reviews on Google
This facility receives high ratings from several reviewers, though much of the positive feedback lacks descriptive detail. One significant concern was raised regarding the handling of residents' personal belongings and financial autonomy, though a single cook was specifically praised for food quality.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food5.0StaffN/ACleanN/AActivitiesN/AMedsN/AMemoryN/ACommsN/AValueN/A

Strengths

  • High overall star ratings
  • Quality food preparation by specific staff

Concerns

  • Improper handling of residents' personal belongings
  • Lack of resident autonomy regarding personal funds

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

2345.02020(1)5.02021(3)3.02022(2)4.02025(1)5.02026(1)

Distribution · 8 analyzed

5
6
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
1

How They Respond to Reviews

0%response rate

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1With such an impressive 5-star rating for both health inspections and staffing, how do you ensure that high level of personalized care remains consistent for every resident?
  • 2Since the facility is a specialized community for veterans, are there specific programs or social activities designed to honor their service and connect them with fellow veterans?
  • 3How does the nursing team coordinate with outside doctors or specialists if a resident has a sudden change in their medical condition?
  • 4I noticed the facility is a close-knit community of 60 residents; how do you foster a sense of family and belonging among everyone living here?
  • 5What kind of daily activities or outings are available to keep residents engaged and active within the Homelake community?
  • 6How do you manage the two recent deficiencies noted in the CMS report to ensure they are addressed and don't impact the quality of care?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

only good thing they got is 1 cook who actually knows what the clients like.

Family member of a resident · 2022☆☆☆☆
Source: 8 Google reviews

Staffing

Staffing Hours

per resident/day · Medicare 2026
RN Hours
1.80hrs
OK
Registered nurses for medical care
Total Nursing
5.03hrs
OK
All nurses + aides combined
Staff Turnover
28%
Lower is better (< 30% = good)
RN Turnover
36%
Lower is better (< 30% = good)

This facility meets the national staffing benchmarks. Higher staffing is linked to fewer falls and better day-to-day care.

Quality Measures

Quality Measures

Resident outcomes compared with national, state, and local averages · 16 measures

Medicare Rating
3/ 5
Better Than Avg

7

measures

Worse Than Avg

8

measures

Mixed Results

1

measures

Long-Stay Residents
😔

Residents with depression symptoms

↓ Lower is better
This Facility0.0%
Better than Avg
Here
0.0%
US
12.1%
CO
8.5%

Highly dependent on how each facility screens and codes depressive symptoms, so it varies widely between facilities.

🚿

Residents whose bladder or bowel control got worse

↓ Lower is better
This Facility9.8%
Better than Avg
Here
9.8%
US
19.4%
CO
21.7%
💊

Residents on antipsychotic medication

↓ Lower is better
This Facility11.2%
Better than Avg
Here
11.2%
US
15.5%
CO
20.0%
💊

Residents on anti-anxiety or sleep medication

↓ Lower is better
This Facility11.6%
Mixed vs Avgs
Here
11.6%
US
19.5%
CO
11.3%
🛏️

Residents needing more daily help over time

↓ Lower is better
This Facility20.7%
Worse than Avg
Here
20.7%
US
14.4%
CO
13.8%
⚖️

Residents who lost too much weight

↓ Lower is better
This Facility11.2%
Worse than Avg
Here
11.2%
US
5.3%
CO
5.0%
Short-Stay Residents (Rehab / Post-Acute)
💉

Short-stay residents vaccinated for pneumonia

↑ Higher is better
This Facility47.3%
Worse than Avg
Here
47.3%
US
81.8%
CO
76.3%
💊

Short-stay residents newly given antipsychotics

↓ Lower is better
This Facility0.0%
Better than Avg
Here
0.0%
US
1.6%
CO
1.5%
Source: Medicare quality measures

US average from Medicare published data

Inspection History

Medicare Inspection History

3-year lookback · Medicare 2026

2deficiencies
Well below state avg (8.8)
1 complaint-triggered

This facility has a concerning complaint-triggered deficiency for resident abuse or neglect protection in early 2024, indicating families filed reports about serious safety issues. The most recurring problems involve fire safety equipment, respiratory care, and general care quality standards. While all deficiencies show correction dates, the pattern of safety issues across multiple surveys and the complaint history warrant careful consideration during visits.

Oct 17, 2024Routine
4
0345Potential for harm · WidespreadCorrected

Smoke Deficiencies

Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.

0355Potential for harm · WidespreadCorrected

Smoke Deficiencies

Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.

0658Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies

Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

0678Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.

Feb 13, 2024Complaint
1
0600Actual harm · IsolatedCorrected

Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies

Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

Mar 16, 2023Routine
6
0812Potential for harm · WidespreadCorrected

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

0883Potential for harm · PatternCorrected

Infection Control Deficiencies

Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.

0689Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

0695Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

0810Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies

Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.

0324Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Smoke Deficiencies

Provide properly protected cooking facilities.

Dec 2, 2021Routine
1
0695Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: CO Dept. of Public Health & Environment

8total
3deficiencies
May 13, 2025Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Dec 23, 2024Follow-up
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Nov 15, 2024Follow-up
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Nov 13, 2024Routine
N/A0000, 0345, 0355

Based on observation it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the fire alarm system components and devices in accordance with the Life Safety Code 101 and NFPA 72. This was evidenced by the following:1. The main fire alarm panel in this facility showed a Trouble status for a CO Detector.2012 Life Safety Code 101 section 9.6.1.5* To ensure operational integrity, the fire alarm system shall have an approved maintenance and testing program complying with the applicable requirements of NFPA 70, National Electrical Code, and NFPA 72, National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code.Failure to maintain the fire alarm system has the potential to harm all occupants, staff, and visitors within the building should a delay occur in locating a fire throughout the facility.This deficiency has the potential to affect occupants, who might include residents, staff, and visitors throughout the entire facility. Deficient items were discussed with the Administrator and Operations Manager at the exit conference. Based on observations and records review, it was determined that the facility did not maintain fire extinguishers In accordance with NFPA 10. This was evidenced by the following:1. The annual fire extinguisher inspection report performed by Pre Action Fire on 9/24/2024 stated that 35 fire extinguishers failed the annual inspection (Record Review). Based on observation (visually checking fire extinguisher tags throughout the facility) and interview, these 35 fire extinguisher failures have not been corrected at the time of the survey. The proivder failed to correct the identified failures. The Operations Manager stated that Pre Action Fire will perform the necessary repairs and provide an updated report once the corrective service has occurred.Life Safety Code 101, 2012 Edition, section 9.7.4. Where required by the provision of another section of this code, portable fire extinguishers shall be installed, inspected and maintained in accordance with NFPA 10 Standards for Portable Fire Extinguishers.NFPA 10, 2010 Edition, section 7.3.1.1.1 Fire extinguishers shall be subjected to maintenance at intervals of not more than 1 year, at the time of hydrostatic test, or when specifically indicated by an inspection or electronic notification.7.3.1.1.2 Fire extinguishers shall be internally examined at intervals not exceeding those specified in Table 7.3.1.1.2.This deficiency has the pot.. This survey was conducted in accordance with the Federal Register at Section 42 CFR 483.90(a). The initial comments (ID Prefix Tag # K000) are informational only and a representation of the facility' s general characteristics. The facility is a one-story wood frame structure, Type V(111) construction, without a basement. The breezeway and associated attic space between the long-term care facility and the administration building is separated by two-hour fire rated construction. The facility and the administration buildings are protected throughout by a dry-pipe automatic fire sprinkler systems and is classified as Fully Sprinklered. The survey was conducted on November 13, 2024 using National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 101, Life Safety Code, 2012 edition, Chapter 19 for Existing Health Care Occupancies. The facility is licensed for 60 beds. The census was reported to be 40 residents at the time of the survey. The deficiencies found during the survey were discussed with the Administrator and the Operations Manager during the Exit Conference. The facility will be in compliance upon the completion of the deficiencies noted during the survey.

Oct 17, 2024Routine
N/A0000, 0658, 0678

A recertification survey was conducted from 10/14/24 to 10/17/24. Two deficiencies were cited. An Emergency Preparedness survey was conducted from 10/14/24 to 10/17/24. No deficiencies were cited. Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide services for two (#15 and #7) of two residents reviewed out of 23 sample residents according to professional standards of practice.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #15' s and Resident #7' s vital signs, specifically the resident' s blood pressure and pulse, were monitored and assessed prior to the administration of a blood pressure medication.Findings include:I. Professional referenceAccording to Kizior, R. J. Hodgson, K. J. (2023). Metoprolol. Saunders Nursing Drug Handbook. Elsevier. p. 770."Assess B/P (blood pressure), heart rate immediately before drug administration. If pulse in 60 beats per minute or less or systolic B/P is less than 90 mmHg (millimeters of mercury) withhold medication and contact physician." According to Kizior, R. J. Hodgson, K. J. (2023). Amlodipine. Saunders Nursing Drug Handbook. Elsevier. P. 60."Assess B/P, if systolic B/P is less than 90 mmHg, withhold medication, contact physician."According to Kizior, R. J. Hodgson.. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate resident resuscitation choices in the medical record for three (#141, #13 and #32) of fourteen residents out of 23 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure a physician' s order was in place for a do not resuscitate (DNR) for Resident #141, who wished to be a DNR per the resident' s Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOST) form;-Ensure documentation of a MOST form was in place for Resident #13; and,-Ensure the MOST form was discussed with and signed by Resident #32, who was cognitively intact.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Advanced Directives and Resident Rights to Refuse Treatment policy and procedure, revised 9/9/24, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 10/16/24 at 8:00 a.m. It read in pertinent part,"On admission, the facility will determine if the resident has executed an advance directive, and if not, determine whether the resident would like to formulat..

Apr 15, 2024Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Apr 15, 2024Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Feb 13, 2024Complaint
N/A0000 & 1509

A survey prompted by complaint #CO35119 was completed 2/13/24. One deficiency was cited. Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#1) of four residents reviewed for abuse out of four sample residents was kept free from abuse.Resident #2 and Resident #1 were involved in an altercation on 11/7/23. Resident #2 attacked Resident #1 and Resident #1 had injuries that included a scratch to his left forehead that was cleaned, a scratch on his nose, an abrasion to his left face/cheek, left jawline, left ear and bruising to the top of his left shoulder. There was redness around his neck and Resident #1 complained of severe left shoulder pain. Interventions added after the altercation were to move Resident #2 to a different hall and the resident was to be in the staff' s line of sight. However, those interventions were not effective due to another altercation that occurred on 1/3/24.According to Resident #1, on 1/3/24 Resident #2 pulled him down and hit him. Resident #2 had redness/possible bruising to the right hand at the base of the third finger knuckle and an abrasion on the back of his left hand. Resident #1 sustained a bloody nose, a skin tear to his nose and left hand and two abrasions to the forehead. He also sustained a fracture to one of the fingers on his right hand. Resident #1 was sent to the hospital for evaluation and treatment.The facility failed to implement measures to protect Resident #1 from abuse perpetrated by Resident #2, who was known to be physically aggressive. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Abuse policy, revised 10/16/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/13/2024 at 4:05 p.m. It documented in pertinent part, "It is the policy of the (corporation) to provide protection for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent mistreatment, abuse, neglect and exploitation. The (facility) will take necessary precautions to prevent resident abuse by anyone including staff members, other residents, volunteer, contracted staff, family members, resident rep..

Ownership & Operations

Who Operates This Facility

Owner / Operator

Colorado Veterans Community Living Ctr at Homelake

Organization Type

government

Ownership & Management

Owners

State of Colorado

Owner · Organization

Key personnel

Aldrich, ErinW-2 Managing EmployeeDavis, ChristaW-2 Managing EmployeeMontague, MindyW-2 Managing Employee
Source: Medicare provider data

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call