See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Assisted Living

Citrus Manor Assisted Living, LLC

Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight compassionate and caring staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.

1816 East Brown Road, East Orangewood Estates · Mesa, AZ 85203Licensed & Active
Google rating
4.7/5

based on 10 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1

Watch Citrus Manor Assisted Living, LLC

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

This facility is an excellent choice if you are looking for a clean, homey environment with staff who treat residents like family. However, you should verify if the pricing fits your budget and ask about their protocols for responding to visitors at the door.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

10 reviews analyzed
Families can expect a highly caring, family-oriented environment where staff members treat residents like their own family. While most reviewers praise the cleanliness and the compassionate, long-term staff, one reviewer noted concerns regarding high pricing and responsiveness to visitors.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food10.0Staff10.0Clean10.0Activities9.0MedsN/AMemory10.0Comms10.0Value2.0

Strengths

  • Compassionate and caring staff
  • Extremely clean and well-maintained facility
  • Family-oriented and welcoming atmosphere
  • High staff retention and stability

Concerns

  • High pricing relative to care quality

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

2345.02018(1)5.02019(1)3.52021(2)5.02022(4)5.02024(2)

Distribution

5
9
4
0
3
0
2
1
1
0

How They Respond to Reviews

0%response rate

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1It is wonderful to see how clean and well-maintained the facility looks; what are your specific protocols for maintaining this level of cleanliness daily?
  • 2We've heard such lovely things about the warmth of your team; how do you foster that sense of a family-oriented atmosphere for new residents?
  • 3Since your staff seems to stay with you for a long time, how does that stability benefit the continuity of care for our loved one?
  • 4With the premium level of care provided here, could you walk us through how the monthly cost translates into specific amenities and personalized services?
  • 5What does a typical day of social activities and engagement look like for the residents here?
  • 6In the event of a medical emergency or a change in health status during the night, what is your specific protocol for care and communication with the family?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

Those sweet ladies cared for him like he was their own dad! He went in so sick with several ailments and the care they gave him helped him get better on many levels.

Family member of a former resident · 2022★★★★★

They cared for my mother for over three years now. They cared for my father as well until his recent passing. My father was sharp as a tack and absolutely adored the sweet ladies that cared for him and for my mother who has complete debilitating dementia.

Long-term resident's family · 2022★★★★★

The home was always very clean, nourishing home-cooked meals were served, and there was genuine kind & patient interaction from the caregivers to their residents.

Family member of a former resident · 2019★★★★★
Source: 10 Google reviews

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: AZ State Licensing Agency

3total
7deficiencies
Mar 4, 2026Complaint

The following deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00160004 conducted on March 4, 2026:

AdministrationR9-10-803.A.9

Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure compliance with A.R.S. § 36-411 based on one of three records sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employee was a danger to a vulnerable population. Findings include: 1. A.R.S. § 36-411 states, "A... as a condition of licensure or continued licensure of a residential care institution, a nursing care institution or a home health agency and as a condition of employment in a residential care institution, a nursing care institution or a home health agency, employees and owners of residential care institutions, nursing care institutions or home health agencies or contracted persons or volunteers who provide medical services, nursing services, behavioral health services, health-related services, home health services or supportive services and who have not been subject to the fingerprinting requirements of a health professional's regulatory board pursuant to title 32 shall have valid fingerprint clearance cards that are issued pursuant to title 41, chapter 12, article 3.1 or shall apply for a fingerprint clearance card within twenty working days of employment or beginning volunteer work..." 2. A review of E3's personnel record revealed E3 worked as a caregiver and had a hire date of May 9, 2025. The personnel record revealed a fingerprint clearance card with an expiration date of October 22, 2025. 3. A review of the Department of Public Safety (DPS) fingerprint clearance card database revealed no information was found or yielded in the search. 4. A review of the facility's March 2026 work schedule revealed E3 was scheduled to work during the month of March. 5. In an interview, O1 made call attempts and spoke with E1 and E3 to obtain a valid fingerprint clearance card for E3 with no information being provided to the Compliance Officer before the inspection concluded. 6. In an exit interview, findings were reviewed with O1 and no additional information was provided.

AdministrationR9-10-803.A.10

Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the governing authority failed to ensure the health, safety, or welfare of a resident was not placed at risk of harm. The deficient practice posed a risk as the resident's whereabouts were unknown. Findings included: 1. A review of Department records revealed [R2] was found wandering the streets. Someone found [R2] took [R2] to the Fire Department. [R2] was taken back to the facility. The facility was unaware of [R2] leaving the facility. 2. A review of R2's medical record revealed an "Unusual Occurrence Report" dated February 23, 2026 at 10:04 am. The report stated "Resident eloped from facility..called 911..." 3. A review of R2's medical record revealed documentation showing R2 had a diagnosis of "Alzheimer's Disease". Additionally, R2's medical record revealed a service plan dated January 21, 2026, that stated "Wandering at times" and "Cognitive Skills for Daily Decision Making - Severely impaired". 4. In an exit interview, E1 acknowledged R2 eloped from the facility, and no additional information was provided.

Oct 1, 2025Routine

The following deficiency was found during the on-site compliance inspection conducted on October 1, 2025:

Tuberculosis ScreeningR9-10-113.A.1-2Corrected Dec 8, 2025

Based on record review and interview, the health care institution failed to implement tuberculosis (TB) infection control activities that included annual training and education related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of TB to individuals employed by the health care institution. The deficient practice posed a risk as the caregiver received no organized instruction or information related to TB surveillance. Findings include: 1. Review of E1's personnel record revealed that there was no annual continuing education training for recognizing the signs and symptoms of TB. 2. Review of E2's personnel record revealed that there was no annual continuing education training for recognizing the signs and symptoms of TB. 3. In an exit interview, the findings were discussed with E2 and no additional information was provided. 4. Technical assistance was provided on this Rule during the inspection conducted on August 3, 2022, and this is a repeat deficiency from the inspection conducted on September 5, 2023.

Sep 5, 2023Routine

The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection conducted on September 5, 2023:

Health care institutions; fall prevention and fall recovery; training programs; definitionA.R.S. § 36-420.01.ACorrected Dec 6, 2023

Based on documentation review and interview, the health care institution failed to develop and administer a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery to include initial training and continued competency training in fall prevention and fall recovery. The deficient practice posed a risk as organized instruction and information related to resident care and safety was not developed and administered. Findings include: 1. A review of facility documentation revealed a policy and procedure for fall prevention and fall recovery was not available for review. 2. A review of facility documentation revealed a training program for fall prevention and fall recovery was not available for review. 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the facility failed to develop and administer a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery to include initial training and continued competency training. Technical assistance was provided on this Rule during the compliance inspection completed on August 3, 2022.

Except as required in subsection (B), a manager shall ensure that a resident has a written service plan that:R9-10-808.A.4.b.iiCorrected Sep 6, 2023

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a written service plan was reviewed and updated at least once every six months, for two of two residents sampled who received personal care services. The deficient practice posed a risk as a service plan did not reinforces and clarifies services to be provided to a resident. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's (accepted in 2023) medical record revealed a service plan dated in February 2023 for personal care services. However, documentation to demonstrate R1's service plan was reviewed and updated at least once every six months was not available for review. 2. A review of R2's (accepted in 2019) medical record revealed a service plan dated in January 2023 for personal care services. However, documentation to demonstrate R2's service plan was reviewed and updated at least once every six months was not available for review. 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the service plans for R1 and R2 were not updated. This is a repeat deficiency from the compliance inspection conducted on August 3, 2022.

A manager shall ensure that:R9-10-818.A.3.a-dCorrected Dec 6, 2023

Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a disaster plan review required in (A)(2) was documented to include the time of the disaster plan review; a critique of the disaster plan review; and if applicable, recommendations for improvement. Findings include: 1. A review of facility documentation revealed a disaster plan review dated in December 2022. However, the disaster plan review did not include documentation of the time of the disaster plan review; a critique of the disaster plan review; and if applicable recommendations for improvement. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the disaster plan review did not include documentation of the time of the disaster plan review; a critique of the disaster plan review; and if applicable, recommendations for improvement. Technical assistance was provided on this Rule during the compliance inspection completed on August 3, 2022.

Tuberculosis ScreeningR9-10-113.A.2.a-fCorrected Sep 15, 2023

Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the health care institution's chief administrative officer failed to ensure the health care institution established, documented, and implemented tuberculosis infection control activities required in R9-10-113.A.2.a-f. Findings include: 1. A review of facility documentation revealed documentation of tuberculosis infection activities required in R9-10-113.A.2.a-f were not available for review. 2. A review of R1's medical revealed revealed a baseline screening, on or before the date specified in the applicable Article of this Chapter, that consists of: i. assessing risks of prior exposure to infectious tuberculosis, and ii. determining if the individual has signs or symptoms of tuberculosis was not available for review. Based on R1's date of admission, the documentation was required. 3. A review of E1's, E2's, and E3's personnel records revealed documentation of annual training and education related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of tuberculosis was not available for review. 4. A review of facility documentation revealed documentation of annually assessing the health care institution's risk of exposure to infectious tuberculosis was not available for review. 5. In an interview, E1 reported the health care institution had not established, documented, and implemented tuberculosis infection control activities required in R9-10-113.A.2.a-f. Technical assistance was provided on this Rule during the compliance inspection completed on August 3, 2022.

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call