Casa De Sonshine Assisted Living, LLC
Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight compassionate, family-like care. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 20 Google reviews
Watch Casa De Sonshine Assisted Living, LLC
Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.
We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
What this means for your family
This facility is an excellent choice for families seeking a small, intimate setting where residents are treated like family members. The staff's dedication to personalized attention is a standout strength, though because the facility is described as 'small,' you should verify if their specific level of medical support meets your loved one's clinical needs.
Google Reviews
Google Reviews
20 reviews analyzed“Families considering Casa de Sonshine can expect a highly personalized, home-like environment where residents are treated with significant compassion. Reviewers consistently praise the staff's attentive care and the facility's peaceful, clean atmosphere, though most reviews are brief and lack specific details on long-term medical outcomes.”
Quality Themes
Strengths
- Compassionate, family-like care
- Peaceful and calming environment
- Attentive and professional staff
- Clean and well-maintained facility
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution
How They Respond to Reviews
This facility rarely responds to reviews.
Questions for Your Tour
- 1It is so wonderful to see how clean and well-maintained the facility is; what is your team's daily routine for ensuring the environment stays so peaceful?
- 2We love the idea of a family-like atmosphere here; how do the staff members personally get to know each resident's unique likes and dislikes?
- 3Since we want our loved one to stay active, what kind of daily activities or social outings do you host to keep residents engaged?
- 4In the event of a medical emergency during the night, what is the specific protocol for contacting both the physician and our family?
- 5We noticed you are very attentive to the community; how do you typically communicate important facility updates or changes to the families?
- 6How do you ensure that the professional and attentive level of care mentioned by others is maintained consistently across all shifts?
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“Esther and her staff were wonderful with the care they provided for my mom. The entire experience was amazing. All private rooms and pretty much unlimited visiting hours was my first reason I choose Casa de Sonshine but the overall quality of the caregivers and attention to my mom and her needs made this all worth it.”
“My mother lived at this home for over two years. She was in extremely bad condition due to poor care at another home. They took her in, cared for her and gave her tender loving care.”
“It’s an absolutely beautiful establishment that brings about a peaceful and calming environment. The folks are super happy and well maintained, and it feels like a home outside of home.”
State Inspection History
State Inspections
Source: AZ State Licensing Agency
Nov 25, 2025Routine
The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection conducted on November 25, 2025:
Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the disaster plan was reviewed at least once every 12 months. The deficient practice posed a risk as a disaster plan reinforces and clarifies standards expected of employees. Findings include: 1. A review of facility documentation revealed no documentation of a disaster plan review was available for the Compliance Officer to review. 2. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1. E1 acknowledged E1 was unaware that the facility had to review the disaster plan at least once every 12 months. 3. This is a repeat deficiency from the compliance inspection conducted December 21, 2022.
Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure that hot water temperatures were maintained between 95º F and 120º F in areas of an assisted living facility used by residents. Findings Include: 1. During an environmental tour of the facility, the Compliance Officer checked the water temperature of the bathroom by bedroom #8 and it read 130.1º F. The Compliance Officer checked the water temperature of the bathroom by bedroom #1 and it read 129.6º. 2. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no further information was provided.
Mar 1, 2024Complaint
The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection and investigation of complaint's AZ00201832, AZ00203020, AZ00203667, and AZ00203838 conducted on March 1, 2024:
Based on documentation review, record, review and interview, the manager failed to ensure documentation required by this Article was provided to the Department within two hours after a Department request. Findings include: 1. On February 3, 2023, the Compliance Officer requested the following documents during the on-site inspection: - Medical record for R3; and - Documentation of an incident when R3 was sent to the hospital. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged this information was not provided to the Compliance Officer within the two hours requested. E1 reported the previous owner was in possession of the files and passed away unexpectedly.
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's medical record contained the resident's service plan and updates, for one of three resident records reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk as the Department was unable to determine substantial compliance as the required documentation was not in the medical record during the inspection. Findings include: 1. A review of R3's medical record revealed no service plan was available for review. However, based on R3's date of acceptance, a completed service plan was required. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged a complete medical record for R3 was not provided for review, because E1 could not locate a file for R3.
Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a facility authorized to provide directed care services had a means of exiting the facility for a resident who does not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort and provided access to an outside area, which alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed potential egress dangers to residents. Findings include: 1. A review of the Department's documentation revealed the facility was authorized to provide directed care services. 2. The Compliance Officer observed when exiting from back door leading to the backyard, no alarm sounded to alert employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. Further inspection revealed the door alert was set to the "OFF" position. 3. The Compliance Officer observed E1 switch the alert to the "CHIME" position and heard the alert sound. 4. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the back door alert was not active and would not alert employees of the egress of a resident from the facility.
Based on record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a medication administered to a resident was documented in the resident's medical record, for one of three resident records reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk as medication could not be verified as administered against a medication order. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a service plan for personal care services and medication administration. 2. A review of R1's medical record revealed a signed list of medication orders dated October 27, 2023. The list included the following: - "Levetiracetam (Keppra) 250MG/PO/Q12/half a tablet/7:30am@7:30pm"; - "Donepezil Hydrochloride 5MG PO QD HS"; and - "Furosemide 20MG PO QD AM". 3. A review of R1's medical record revealed a Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated December 2023. The MAR was not documented to indicate the administration of Levetiracetam at 7:30pm or Donepezil Hydrochloride on December 30 and 31, 2023. 4. A review of R1's medical record revealed a MAR dated January 2024. The MAR was not documented to indicate the administration of Furosemide on January 23, 24, and 25, 2024. 5. In an interview, E1 acknowledged medication administered to a resident was not correctly documented in the resident's medical record.
Contact
Get in Touch
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
References & Resources
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
20 reviews from families & visitors
Medicare data downloads
Original nursing home datasets
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Nearby Alternatives
The Villa Rosa
< 1 miAssisted Living · Sahuarita, AZ
Haven Springs at Green Valley
< 1 miAssisted Living · Green Valley, AZ
Family Loving Kare S1
1.8 miAssisted Living · Sahuarita, AZ
Family Loving Kare S3
1.9 miAssisted Living · Sahuarita, AZ
Villas at Green Valley, Villa J
2.8 miAssisted Living · Green Valley, AZ
Villas at Green Valley, Villa C
2.8 miAssisted Living · Green Valley, AZ