See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Assisted LivingMedicaid

Assurance Assisted Living Home at Killarney LLC

Limited public data on Assurance Assisted Living Home at Killarney LLC. Call, tour, and ask to meet current residents' families — your own impression matters most.

2895 South Killarney Way, The Conservatory at the Plains · Aurora, CO 8001311 bedsLicensed & Active
Source: CO CDPHE — view official record
Google rating
3.7/5

based on 6 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1
Assurance Assisted Living Home at Killarney LLC Assisted Living in Aurora, CO — Street View
Street View

Watch Assurance Assisted Living Home at Killarney LLC

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

While the facility is physically well-maintained and offers a home-like environment, the recent reports of inadequate staffing and poor nutrition are serious red flags. We strongly advise families to conduct unannounced visits and specifically observe staff-to-resident ratios and meal service before making a decision.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

6 reviews on Google
Reviews for this facility are highly polarized, with some visitors praising the home-like environment and staff dedication, while others report serious concerns regarding resident care. Families have expressed significant alarm over issues related to nutrition, hygiene, and staffing levels, which resulted in negative health outcomes for some residents.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food1.0Staff5.0Clean6.0ActivitiesN/AMedsN/AMemory2.0CommsN/AValueN/A

Strengths

  • Clean, well-maintained interior
  • Home-like, welcoming atmosphere
  • Attractive outdoor space

Concerns

  • Inadequate staffing levels (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
  • Poor nutrition and meal quality (mentioned by 2 reviewers)

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

2345.02014(3)3.72021(3)1.02023(1)

Distribution · 7 analyzed

5
5
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
2

How They Respond to Reviews

83%response rate

This facility actively engages with reviewer feedback.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1It is so lovely to see how clean and well-maintained the home looks; how do you ensure that this welcoming, home-like atmosphere is maintained for all 11 residents?
  • 2We noticed you are very active in responding to feedback from the community, which we appreciate; how does the management team use resident or family feedback to make improvements?
  • 3Could you tell us a bit more about the daily meal schedule and how the menu is planned to ensure everyone enjoys nutritious and tasty options?
  • 4With such a small, intimate group of residents, how do you manage staffing during the night or on weekends to ensure everyone has constant support?
  • 5What kind of specialized support or routine is in place for residents who may need extra help with memory-related needs?
  • 6What are some of the favorite daily activities or social events that the residents enjoy doing together in the outdoor space?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

I did notice when I was able to visit that there were up to 8 elderly being cared for with only one very petite caretaker.

Memory care family member · 2021☆☆☆☆

My dad was here a year ago and like the other reviewer stated he too lost weight because he wasn’t fed or the food wasn’t properly cooked wasn’t given fresh water either.

Long-term resident's family · 2023☆☆☆☆

This home was extremely clean, tastefully updated, and well decorated, it even smelled like Christmas!

Prospective family member · 2014★★★★★
Source: 6 Google reviews

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: CO Dept. of Public Health & Environment

10total
7deficiencies
Feb 25, 2026Other
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Dec 11, 2025Complaint
N/A0000 & 9999

A revisit survey was completed on 12/11/25 for all previous deficiencies cited on 6/30/25. The facility is in compliance with all deficiencies that were cited. Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally

Dec 11, 2025Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Jun 30, 2025Complaint
N/A0000, 0642, 1600 and 2 more

A relicensure survey with complaint #CO39848 was completed on 6/30/25. Deficiencies were cited. Based on interviews and record review, the residence failed to ensure that each staff member met the dementia training requirements in 7.9(B), affecting six current residents.Findings include:Personnel files for Staff #1 and #3 provided by the administrator designee, revealed no evidence that the staff members met the dementia training requirements in part 7.9(B).Review of resident records revealed Resident #1 and #4 had diagnoses of dementia. On 6/30/25 at 4:45 p.m., the administrator designee stated Staff #1 and #3 had not completed the required dementia training in 7.9(B) since she was unaware of the requirement. On 6/30/25 at 4:46 p.m., the house manager stated she was aware of the requirement for dementia training. She stated there was a dementia trainer who had provid.. Based on observation, record review and interviews, the residence failed to comply with the Colorado Clean Indoor Air Act at Sections 25-14-201 through 25-14-209, C.R.S., affecting six current residents. Findings include:1. ObservationOn 6/30/25 at 10:27 a.m., an environmental tour revealed the residence' s designated smoking area and fire resistant disposal container less than 25 feet of the residence' s back door. 2. Record ReviewA list of current smokers was requested from the administrator. Smoking evaluations were provided for Resident #2 and #3. 3. InterviewsOn 6/30/25 at 3:45 p.m., Staff #2 stated Resident #2 and #3 smoked on the outdoor patio, which was less than 25 feet from the back door of the residence. On 6/30/25 at 4:49 p.m., the administrator designee stated she w.. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the residence failed to ensure the medication administration record reflected the correct dosage, and that each qualified medication administration person (QMAP) documented accurate information on the medication administration record (MAR), affecting two of three sample residents whose medications were reviewed (#1, #3). Findings include:Resident #3 was admitted to the residence on 1/31/24. A written practitioner' s order, dated 3/12/25, directed the residence to administer Risperdol 2 mg in the evening. However, the June 2025 MAR read the medication was administered at bedtime twice from 6/1-6/29/25. Additionally, staff #1 signed off that Risperdol 2 mg was administered in the evening of 6/30/25 which had not yet oc.. THIS PORTION OF THE REPORT IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.No response is necessary.The residence was advised it must review and maintain the following processes in accordance with existing program regulations found at 6 CCR 1011-1, Chapter 7.14.31 The administrator and the QMAP supervisor shall, on a quarterly basis, audit the accuracy andcompleteness of the medication administration records, controlled substance list, medication errorreports, and medication disposal records. Any irregularities shall be investigated and resolved.The results of the audits shall be documented and routinely included as part of the assisted livingresidence ' s Quality Management Program assessment and review." ..

Jun 30, 2025Complaint
N/A0000, 0164, 0920

A recertification survey with complaint #CO39847 was completed on 6/30/25. Deficiencies were cited. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility (residence) failed to comply with the restrictions on smoking near entryways outlined in the Colorado Clean Indoor Air Act (CCIAA), affecting six current members (residents).Findings include:1. ObservationOn 6/30/25 at 10:27 a.m., an environmental tour revealed the residence' s designated smoking area and fire resistant disposal container less than 25 feet of the residence' s back door. 2. Record ReviewA list of current smokers was requested from the administrator. Smoking evaluations were provided for Resident #2 and #3. 3. InterviewsOn 6/30/25 at 3:45 p.m., Staff #2 stated Resident #2 and #3 smoked on the outdoor patio, which was less than 25 feet from the back door of the residence. On 6/30/25 at 4:49 p.m., the administrator designee stated she was aware of the requirement for the designated smoking area to be over 25 feet from entryways and would have expected compliance with the Colorado Clean Indoor Air Act. Based on record review and interview, the (facility) residence failed to ensure each qualified medication administration person (QMAP) accurately recorded all medications administered, affecting two of three sample (members) residents whose medications were reviewed (#1, #3.)Findings include:Resident #3 was admitted to the residence on 1/31/24. A written practitioner' s order, dated 3/12/25, directed the residence to administer Risperdol 2 mg in the evening. However, the June 2025 MAR read the medication was administered at bedtime twice from 6/1-6/29/25. Additionally, staff #1 signed off that Risperdol 2 mg was administered in the evening of 6/30/25 which had not yet occurred, for a total of 30 inaccurately documented doses. On 6/30/25 at 2:41 p.m., Staff #1 stated she only administered Risperdol 2 mg once and was unsure why it was duplicated on the June 2025 MAR. She stated that she had accidentally signed off for the evening 6/30/25 although she had not yet administered the medication.On 6/30/25 at 4:44 p.m., the house manager stated she was responsible for updating MARs and should have caught that Risperdol 2 mg was duplicated on the MAR.On 6/30/25 at approximately 4:45 p.m., the administrator designee stated she would have expected staff to only sign off once on the June 2025 MAR and at the time the admin..

Nov 9, 2023Follow-up
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Nov 9, 2023Complaint
N/A0000 & 9999

A revisit survey was completed on 11/9/23 for all previous deficiencies cited on 3/30/23. The facility is in compliance with all deficiencies that were cited. Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally

Nov 9, 2023Follow-up
N/A0000 & 9999

A revisit survey was completed on 11/9/23 for all previous deficiencies cited on 3/30/23. The facility is in compliance with all deficiencies that were cited. Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call