Apollo Residential Assisted Living
Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight excellent management communication. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 11 Google reviews
Watch Apollo Residential Assisted Living
Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.
We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
What this means for your family
This facility is an excellent choice for families seeking high-touch communication and specialized care for dementia or Alzheimer's patients. While the physical space is described as modest and occasionally crowded, the quality of the medical oversight and the warmth of the staff are significant advantages.
Google Reviews
Google Reviews
11 reviews analyzed“Apollo Residential Assisted Living is highly regarded for its attentive, caring staff and exceptional communication from management, particularly for residents with dementia or Alzheimer's. While some reviewers note the facility is modest in size and can feel a bit crowded, the emphasis on individualized care and a peaceful atmosphere provides a home-like environment.”
Quality Themes
Strengths
- Excellent management communication
- Attentive and caring caregivers
- Knowledgeable medical oversight
- Peaceful, home-like atmosphere
- Strong individualized care focus
Concerns
- Facility can feel crowded for the amount of space
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution
How They Respond to Reviews
This facility actively engages with reviewer feedback.
Questions for Your Tour
- 1Since the management is so responsive to feedback, how do you typically involve families in care planning decisions?
- 2We love the idea of a peaceful, home-like atmosphere; how do you ensure each resident's personal space feels private and comfortable?
- 3With your focus on individualized care, how do you tailor daily activities to match a new resident's specific hobbies and interests?
- 4How does the medical oversight team coordinate with the caregivers to monitor changes in a resident's health?
- 5How do you manage the flow of residents and staff during busy times to ensure the environment remains calm and uncrowded?
- 6What is the protocol for handling a medical emergency during the night or over the weekend?
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The attention and communication with the management was excellent. We always had their attention and found that to be so important when one has a family member in assisted livin”
“Dr. Chris is extremely knowledgeable and was a wonderful advocate for my mom! Although her stay at Apollo Residential was brief, she made tremendous progress under their care.”
“The communication and follow up with the caregivers and Dr. Christopher Zambakari has been exceptional which is especially needed when working with the VA. My brother enjoys working in their garden picking vegetables.”
State Inspection History
State Inspections
Source: AZ State Licensing Agency
Apr 24, 2025Routine
The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection conducted on April 24, 2025.
Based on record review and interview, the health care institution’s chief administrative officer failed to ensure training and education related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of tuberculosis (TB) was provided annually to individuals employed to the health care institution, for two of two personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents. Findings include: 1. A review of E1's, E2's, and E3's personnel record did not include documentation of initial and annual training on recognizing the signs and symptoms of TB. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged that E1's, E2’s, and E3’s records did not contain the training and education related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of tuberculosis (TB). E1 reported that he was not aware of the annual staff training for signs and symptoms of TB.
Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that the disaster plan required in subsection (A)(1) was reviewed at least once every 12 months. Findings include: 1. A review of facility documentation revealed that the Disaster Plan was last reviewed in 2023. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged that the Disaster plan was not reviewed at least once every 12 months.
Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure that poisonous or toxic materials stored by the assisted living facility are maintained in labeled containers in a locked area separate from food preparation and storage, dining areas, and medications and are inaccessible to residents. Findings include: 1. During the environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officers observed a cabinet under the kitchen sink that contained poisonous and toxic materials. The lock on the cabinet did not prevent a resident from opening the cabinet which contained the following items: Cascade dish soap Can of Comet Bleach 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged that poisonous or toxic materials were not stored in an area that was locked and inaccessible to residents.
Oct 5, 2023Routine
The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection conducted on October 5, 2023:
Based on documentation review, observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure a bell, intercom, or other mechanical means to alert employees to a resident's needs or emergencies was available in a bedroom. The deficient practice posed a risk if residents were unable to summon help from personnel members Findings include: 1. A review of Department documentation revealed the facility was authorized to provide directed care services. 2. The Compliance Officer observed no bell, intercom, or other mechanical means to alert employees to a resident's needs or emergencies in three resident bedrooms. 3. In an interview, E2 reported no bell, intercom, or other mechanical means to alert employees to a resident's needs or emergencies was available in several resident's bedroom due to the residents having dementia. 4. In an interview, E1 acknowledged E1 failed to ensure a bell, intercom, or other mechanical means to alert employees to a resident's needs or emergencies was available in a bedroom.
Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the disaster plan required in subsection (A)(1) was reviewed at least once every 12 months. The deficient practice posed a risk as a disaster plan reinforces and clarifies standards expected of employees. Findings include: 1. A review of facility documentation revealed a disaster plan review conducted on August 10, 2020, and June 19, 2021. However, documentation of a disaster plan reviews in 2022 and 2023 were not available for review. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged E1 failed to ensure the disaster plan required in subsection (A)(1) was reviewed at least once every 12 months.
Contact
Get in Touch
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
References & Resources
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
11 reviews from families & visitors
Medicare data downloads
Original nursing home datasets
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Nearby Alternatives
Providence Place at Glencroft
2.4 miNursing Home · Glendale, AZ
Morningstar at Golden Ridge
2.6 miAssisted Living · Peoria, AZ
Amarsi Assisted Living
3.2 miAssisted Living · Glendale, AZ
Beebes Assisted Living LLC
3.9 miAssisted Living · Phoenix, AZ
Premier Assisted Living LLC
3.9 miAssisted Living · Phoenix, AZ
Fairmont Village
4.2 miAssisted Living · Peoria, AZ