See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Nursing HomeMedicaid Top Rated

Alta Mesa Health and Rehabilitation

Strong Medicare quality ratings; families often praise highly skilled physical and occupational therapy teams. Still worth an in-person visit.

5848 East University Drive, Mesa, AZ 8520570 bedsLicensed & Active
5/5
Medicare
Inspection
Quality
Staffing
Google rating
3.9/5

based on 237 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1
Alta Mesa Health and Rehabilitation Nursing Home in Mesa, AZ — Street View
Street View

Watch Alta Mesa Health and Rehabilitation

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

This facility's therapy and wound care teams are frequently praised for their effectiveness, making it a potential option for short-term rehab. However, families must be extremely cautious regarding staffing levels. We strongly recommend visiting during off-hours and weekends to verify response times, as multiple families reported dangerous delays in assistance.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

237 reviews on Google
Alta Mesa Health and Rehabilitation presents a highly polarized experience for families. While many reviewers praise the facility for its attentive therapy department, wound care, and friendly staff, a significant number of families report severe neglect, including long wait times for call lights, poor hygiene, and communication failures. Prospective families should be aware that while some patients have successful rehab stays, others have experienced distressing lapses in basic care and medical oversight.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food6.0Staff5.0Clean3.0Activities5.0Meds2.0MemoryN/AComms3.0ValueN/A

Strengths

  • Highly skilled physical and occupational therapy teams
  • Effective wound care services
  • Attentive and compassionate nursing staff (cited in positive reviews)
  • Clean and welcoming environment (cited in positive reviews)

Concerns

  • Excessive wait times for call lights (often 45+ minutes) (mentioned by 14 reviewers)
  • Poor hygiene and lack of assistance with basic personal care (mentioned by 9 reviewers)
  • Inadequate communication with family members regarding status (mentioned by 7 reviewers)
  • Facility cleanliness and maintenance issues (odors, old equipment) (mentioned by 6 reviewers)
  • Medication management errors or delays (mentioned by 4 reviewers)

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

2343.92020(14)1.72021(10)3.22022(29)3.32023(14)2.52024(25)3.92025(35)4.82026(87)

Distribution · 214 analyzed

5
141
4
10
3
3
2
6
1
54
56 reviews posted between Jan 19, 2026Jan 23, 2026 · 56 were 5-star

How They Respond to Reviews

57%response rate

This facility responds to some reviews.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1We've heard wonderful things about your physical and occupational therapy teams; could you tell us more about how they work with residents to regain independence?
  • 2How does the nursing staff ensure that call lights are answered promptly, especially during busier shifts or overnight?
  • 3What specific protocols do you have in place to ensure medication is administered accurately and on schedule every day?
  • 4How do you keep family members updated on a loved one's health status and any changes in their daily routine?
  • 5What is your process for maintaining the cleanliness of the resident rooms and managing the overall upkeep of the facility?
  • 6Can you describe the daily activities or social programs available to help residents stay engaged and connected with others?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

The CNA people are usually prompt in responding to a request for service, pushing the button. As most places, they could use another nurse to help Distributing medications on time.

Rehab patient · 2025★★★★

My mom has been at Alta Mesa in skilled nursing for almost two months, and our experience has been extremely disappointing and concerning. While there, she contracted an infectious disease. Even though the infectious disease doctor has cleared her, the facility continues to keep her in isolation, not allowing her to leave her room.

Long-term resident's family · 2025☆☆☆☆

I physically had to transport and care for my father numerous times due to the staff not answering. I once left the light on to see how long it would take for them to answer; it took 45 minutes!

Family member · 2024★★★★★
Source: 237 Google reviews

Staffing

Staffing Hours

per resident/day · Medicare 2026
RN Hours
0.56hrs
74%
Registered nurses for medical care
Total Nursing
4.14hrs
OK
All nurses + aides combined
Staff Turnover
46%
Lower is better (< 30% = good)
RN Turnover
47%
Lower is better (< 30% = good)

RN hours are below the national benchmark. RNs handle complex medical needs and medication, so ask about coverage during your visit.

Quality Measures

Quality Measures

Resident outcomes compared with national, state, and local averages · 16 measures

Medicare Rating
5/ 5
Better Than Avg

13

measures

Worse Than Avg

3

measures

Long-Stay Residents
🚿

Residents whose bladder or bowel control got worse

↓ Lower is better
This Facility38.0%
Worse than Avg
Here
38.0%
US
19.4%
AZ
20.5%
Maricopa
20.6%
💊

Residents on antipsychotic medication

↓ Lower is better
This Facility0.0%
Better than Avg
Here
0.0%
US
15.4%
AZ
11.2%
Maricopa
10.8%
🚶

Residents whose walking got worse

↓ Lower is better
This Facility4.0%
Better than Avg
Here
4.0%
US
15.3%
AZ
13.5%
Maricopa
11.5%
😔

Residents with depression symptoms

↓ Lower is better
This Facility2.7%
Better than Avg
Here
2.7%
US
12.1%
AZ
4.0%
Maricopa
4.0%

Highly dependent on how each facility screens and codes depressive symptoms, so it varies widely between facilities.

🛏️

Residents needing more daily help over time

↓ Lower is better
This Facility5.1%
Better than Avg
Here
5.1%
US
14.4%
AZ
10.6%
Maricopa
8.5%
💉

Residents vaccinated for pneumonia

↑ Higher is better
This Facility100.0%
Better than Avg
Here
100.0%
US
93.4%
AZ
97.0%
Maricopa
97.6%
Short-Stay Residents (Rehab / Post-Acute)
💉

Short-stay residents vaccinated for pneumonia

↑ Higher is better
This Facility98.8%
Better than Avg
Here
98.8%
US
81.8%
AZ
91.3%
Maricopa
93.6%
💉

Short-stay residents vaccinated for the flu

↑ Higher is better
This Facility93.6%
Better than Avg
Here
93.6%
US
79.7%
AZ
87.3%
Maricopa
89.3%
💊

Short-stay residents newly given antipsychotics

↓ Lower is better
This Facility0.0%
Better than Avg
Here
0.0%
US
1.6%
AZ
1.1%
Maricopa
1.2%
Source: Medicare quality measures

US average from Medicare published data

Inspection History

Medicare Inspection History

3-year lookback · Medicare 2026

2deficiencies
Well below state avg (7.6)
1 complaint-triggered

Alta Mesa has 12 federal deficiencies across three surveys, with families filing at least one complaint that triggered an inspection regarding nurse staffing information posting. The most recurring issues involve care planning and quality of care, abuse prevention policies, and medication management. All deficiencies have correction dates on file, suggesting the facility addresses problems when identified, though new issues continue to emerge in subsequent surveys.

Nov 20, 2024Complaint
1
0732Potential for harm · PatternCorrected

Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies

Post nurse staffing information every day.

Nov 20, 2024Routine
1
0695Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

Sep 15, 2023Routine
4
0689Potential for harm · PatternCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

0656Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

0684Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

0812Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

Aug 4, 2022Routine
6
0645Potential for harm · PatternCorrected

Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies

PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities

0363Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Smoke Deficiencies

Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.

0606Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies

Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.

0607Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies

Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.

0658Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies

Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

0759Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies

Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: AZ State Licensing Agency

14total
10deficiencies
Jan 9, 2026Other
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Feb 21, 2025Complaint
CleanReport

A complaint survey was conducted on February 21, 2025 for the investigation of intake # ______________. There were no deficiencies cited.

Jan 7, 2025Complaint
CleanReport

An onsite complaint survey was conducted on January 7, 2025 for the investigation of intake # AZ00196556, AZ00196847, AZ00196682, AZ00221228. There were no deficiencies cited.

Dec 18, 2024Complaint
CleanReport

An onsite complaint survey was conducted on December 18, 2024 for the investigation of intake # AZ00220334. There were no deficiencies cited.

Nov 18, 2024Other
CleanReport

42 CFR 482.41 Nursing Home The facility must meet the applicable provisions of the 2012 Edition of the Life Safety Code of the National Fire Protection Association This is a recertification survey for Medicare under LSC 2012, Chapter 19, Existing Health Care Occupancies The entire facility was surveyed on November 26, 2024. The facility meets the standards, based on acceptance of a plan of correction. No apparent deficiencies were found during the survey.

Nov 18, 2024Complaint

The State compliance survey was conducted on November 18 through 20, 2024, in conjunction with the investigation of intake #s: AZ00173016, AZ00173455, AZ00174254, AZ00174293, AZ00174565, AZ00174853, AZ00175673, AZ00178641, AZ00178980 and AZ00178993. The following deficiencies were cited:

A director of nursing shall ensure that:R9-10-412.B.4.d.Corrected Jan 3, 2025

Based on facility documents, staff interviews and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the Daily Staff Postings for nursing staff was accurate and completed for the number of staff hours scheduled and hours worked. Findings Include: A review of the 2024 Alta Mesa Health and Rehabilitation Facility Assessment addressed the staffing plan, charts, and assignments for the facility. According to the assessment, the facility utilized information collected in the resident profile to identify the care and services needed for the residents. The assessment included a sample staffing chart which calculated that the services of 1-2 registered nurses were appropriate for Long-Term Care and Short-Term Care (skilled) residents. The assessment further stated that staffing is ultimately is determined by the census, resident acuity and needs. A review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report for Fiscal Year Quarter 3, 2024 (April 1-June 30), identified the facility as having an excessively low weekend staffing finding. Review of the Daily Staff Posting dated July 6, 2024 revealed no evidence of the registered nurse assigned to the unit as a charge nurse. Further review of the posting revealed 3 Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) worked the 6 am to 6 pm shift, with scheduled hours worked, and actual hours worked of 33.41 hours, after recalculation with the coordinator, it was determined the value was approximately 37.6 hours actually worked. The Daily Staff Postings dated from October 21, 2024 thru November 6, 2024 posting failed to include the actual hours worked by the licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift. The hours reflected in the Time Tracking: Daily Punch Details, did not correspond to the postings The Daily Staff Postings dated November 13, 2024 during the 6 am to 6 pm shift revealed 4 RN's were scheduled to work 36 hours, with an actual worked hour of 35.95 hours. Punch details are listed below: -RN #1 total of 7.62 hours -RN #2 total of 12.18 hours -RN #3 total of 11.57 hours Cumulative Hours of 31.37. On this date there was a total of 3 RN's with an actual worked hour of approximately 31.37 ours. There is a 4.58-hour difference between the posting and punch details. According to the Center for Medicare Services (CMS website) as of November 20, 2024, the facility has a below average (two star) rating for staffing. The Registered Nurse hours per resident per day on the week average for the weekend was recorded at 23 minutes. The national average was 28 minutes. The Arizona average was 30 minutes. Observed with the staffing coordinator the miscalculations transcribed on the Daily Staff Posting dated July 6, 2024. Observed with the coordinator the Daily Staff Postings dated from October 21, 2024 - November 6, 2024, where the actual hours worked column were left blank. On November 18, 2024 during the initial pool screening, multiple alert and oriented residents complained of long wait times for care and voiced th

If respiratory care services are provided on a nursing care institution&#39;s premises, an administrator shall ensure that:R9-10-419.2.a.Corrected Jan 3, 2025

Based on resident and staff interviews, clinical record review, policy review and observations, the facility failed to ensure that one of one sampled resident (#510) was administered oxygen as ordered. Findings include: Resident #510 was admitted on November 15, 2024 with diagnoses that included influenza due to novel influenza A virus with other respiratory manifestations. A physician ' s order dated November 16, 2024 revealed an active order for oxygen at 2 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula (NC) continuous, may titrate to 5 LPM to keep oxygen saturation above 90%. Review of the November 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed evidence that oxygen had been administered via NC at 2LPM between November 16, 2024 to November 20, 2024. A care plan dated November 18, 2024 revealed a focus for oxygen therapy related to ineffective gas exchange, and the interventions included giving medications as ordered by the physician, and to monitor/document side effects and effectiveness. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated November 20, 2024, revealed a Brief Mental Interview Assessment (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated no cognitive impairment. The MDS was in progress and there was no evidence of assessments in other areas. During an initial observation conducted on November 18, 2024 at 8:53 a.m. of resident #510 who was sitting up in bed and there was no evidence that the resident was being administered oxygen; nor was there evidence of oxygen related supplies in her room (ex. Nasal cannula, tubing, or oxygen tank and/or concentrator). A second observation of the resident was conducted on November 20, 2024 at 10:50 a.m. and the resident was observed to be sitting up in her bed and there was no evidence that she was being administered oxygen nor had oxygen related supplies in her room. A final observation of the resident was conducted on November 20, 2024 at 1:19 p.m. and there was no evidence that the resident was receiving oxygen. An interview was conducted on November 20, 2024 at 10:50 a.m. with Resident #510, who stated she had not been administered oxygen since admission An interview was conducted on November 20, 2024 at 11:06 a.m. with a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA/Staff #61). Staff #61 revealed that the facility process for administering oxygen would be to ensure that the resident is being administered the right dosage and ensure that the system is functioning properly. The CNA stated she was familiar with the patient and did not recall ever seeing her on oxygen. The CNA then entered the room and confirmed the resident was not currently being administered oxygen. An interview was conducted on November 20, 2024 at 11:55 a.m. with a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN/Staff #113), who stated that the process for administering oxygen would be to obtain a physician ' s order and administer as written, as this is the facilities expectation.The LPN stated the risks of not administering oxygen as ordered could result in low ox

Sep 24, 2024Complaint
CleanReport

The complaint survey was conducted on September 25, 2024 through September 25, 2024 of the following complaint #'s AZ00216022, AZ00214375 and AZ00216029. No deficiencies were cited.

Aug 12, 2024Complaint
CleanReport

The complaint survey was conducted on August 12, 2024, with the investigation of intake #: AZ00213650, AZ00213570. There were no deficiencies cited.

Ownership & Operations

Who Operates This Facility

Owner / Operator

Alta Mesa Health and Rehabilitation

Organization Type

for profit

Chain Affiliation

Chain Name

The Ensign Group

Chain Size

338 facilities nationwide

Chain avg rating: 3.2/5 · Rank 50 of 328 (Best)

Ownership & Management

Key personnel

King, BretManaging Control - Governing BodyNandipati, HarishManaging Control - Governing BodyBurnam, SoonOfficer / DirectorMonks, ChandlerOfficer / DirectorPeterson, ForrestOfficer / Director
Source: Medicare provider data

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call