Activcare Orange

This report is a Complaint Investigation detailing allegations regarding staff leaving residents unattended or soiled for extended periods. The investigation found conflicting information from staff interviews and the administrator, leading the Licensing Program Analyst to deem all allegations UNSUBSTANTIATED. No specific citations or deficiencies were recorded in the final report.

This report documents a closure visit conducted by the Licensing Program Analyst. The facility, ACTIVCARE ORANGE, has no residents in care, and the license was surrendered by the licensee during the visit. No immediate health or safety concerns were observed due to the zero census.

The facility underwent a Required Annual Inspection and was found to be in compliance with regulations. The report explicitly states that no deficiencies were issued per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations.

This report details a complaint investigation conducted following an unannounced visit. The allegation that a resident sustained injuries due to lack of care was reviewed, and based on the evidence gathered, the allegation was deemed unsubstantiated.

The facility underwent an unannounced case management visit to follow up on a previous incident report. The Licensing Program Analysts observed residents eating lunch and noted that the facility appeared well taken care of. No deficiencies were noted during this visit.

The facility underwent an unannounced required annual inspection. The inspector noted that the facility was generally in good repair, with positive observations regarding resident rooms, restrooms, and common areas. No deficiencies were cited during the observed areas of the facility.

The facility was inspected for a case management visit regarding PPE disposal. The report notes that the administrator confirmed proper disposal procedures, including covered containers for trash, gloves, and masks. No citations were issued at the time of this visit.

This report details a complaint investigation conducted on behalf of the facility. The investigation found that the allegations raised were unsubstantiated, meaning there was not enough evidence to prove neglect or rights violations. No specific deficiencies were cited in the report.