Public Google reviewers rate this highly and often mention compassionate and attentive care staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 74 Google reviews

Email Willowbrook Place to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Public Google reviewers rate Willowbrook Place highly. Reviewers highlight: compassionate and attentive care staff, effective support for emergency placements. Reviewer identity is not verified, and online reviews may not capture everything. Schedule a visit to assess the fit directly.
Willowbrook Place is a dedicated memory care facility that receives high praise for its compassionate, attentive staff and its ability to handle difficult transitions during emergency placements. While many families report peace of mind and significant improvements in their loved ones' quality of life, there are recurring concerns regarding food quality, occasional understaffing, and inconsistent care as dementia symptoms progress.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 73 analyzed
This facility actively engages with reviewer feedback.
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The adjustment period was not easy and the AMAZING staff at Willowbrook did not give up. They went above and beyond and treated my dad like he was family!”
“The staff is phenomenal and the care my grandmother is receiving is by far the best of anywhere else she’s been!”
“The chefs are outstanding- Jackie especially always fixes wonderful soup which my husband loves! No facility is perfect, but Willowbrook comes close.”
Source: CO Dept. of Public Health & Environment
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
A licensure complaint, prompted by #CO38599, was completed on 12/24/24. Deficiencies were cited. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the residence failed to ensure the resident care plan met each requirement for each resident in a secure environment, affecting 49 residents residing in a secure unit. Findings include:1. ObservationOn 12/19/24 at 9:00 a.m., the door to Resident #6' s room was locked and he was unable to enter. Resident #7 offered Resident #6 to go through his room because the men had a shared bathroom. Resident #7 had a key for his personal room, unlocked the door and Resident #6 was able to gain access to his room. Resident #8 was also unable to open the door to his room because the door was locked. Staff #9 was walking down hallway when .. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the residence failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin, affecting three of five sample residents (#1, #3 and #5).Findings include:1. Record ReviewResident #1 was admitted to the residence on 5/31/24, with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety and restlessness and agitation. A progress note, dated 10/15/24 at 12:30 p.m., read Resident #1 had an abrasion above her left eyebrow and Resident #1 spent a lot of time in the common outdoor courtyard in the trees and bushes digging around. A progress note, dated 10/15/24 at 12:58 p.m., read Skin Condition Change: Resident #1 had a skin tear on her left upper forehead.A progress note, date.. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to establish a fall management program which included detailing in each resident' s care plan the individualized approach necessary to address fall risks related to deficits in strength and balance, affecting three of five sample residents (#2-#4). Specifically, the care plan for Resident #4, dated 8/7/24, read Resident #4 required fall risk safety checks with an expected outcome of Resident #4 remaining in a safe environment. The resident sustained a fall in September 2024. The residence subsequently failed to implement and document fall interventions in the care plan. The resident fell on 12/7/24, which resulted in a broken arm and b.. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to evaluate whether a resident could be assisted in a safe manner and provided lift assistance to a resident who was experiencing pain, had a change in their physical baseline status, and requested that staff call 911, affecting 49 current residents living in the secure environment. Specifically, on 11/29/24, Staff found Resident #2 lying on the floor of her room asking for help getting up, requesting to be transported to the emergency department, and had an abrasion on her right forearm. The resident verbalized pain when staff attempted to move her. Staff #2 notified the power of attorney (POA), who instructed Staff #2 to await hi.. Based on record review and interview, the residence' s personnel files failed include first aid certifications for two of three sample staff (#4, #7). On 12/18/24 at 3:07 p.m., a request was made to the administrator or verification of first aid certification for Staff #4, #6 and #7.At 4:07 p.m., the administrator provided a first aid certification for #6 and said human resources was retrieving the remaining two. On 12/19/24 at 9:00 a.m., the administrator said the residence did not have first aid certifications for Staff #4 and #7 and was in the process of obtaining certifications directly from Staff #4 and #7. The administrator added they were aware personnel files were required to include this..
A revisit survey was completed on 12/18/23 for all previous deficiencies cited on 9/28/23. No deficiencies were cited. Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally
A revisit survey was completed on 12/18/23 for all previous deficiencies cited on 9/28/23. No deficiencies were cited. Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally
A licensure revisit was completed on 9/28/23 for all previous deficiencies cited on 10/5/22. Deficiencies were cited. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to ensure a name-based criminal history record check that was conducted by the Colorado Bureau of Investigation (CBI) was completed for each prospective employee prior to staff hire, for three of three sample staff (#8-#10), affecting 41 current residents.This deficiency was cited previously during a state licensure survey 10/5/22. Although the residence corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the residence has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement.Findings include: Review of the personnel file for Staff #8 revealed a hire date of 7/26/23; however, the file contained no evidence a name-based criminal background check had been completed.Review of the personnel file for Staff #9 revealed a hire date of 8/29.. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to ensure each personnel file included orientation and training and results of background checks, for three of three sample staff (#8-#10), affecting 41 current residents.This deficiency was cited previously during a state licensure survey 10/5/22. Although the residence corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the residence has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement.Findings include:The residence' s personnel files for Staff #8 and Contracted Staff #10 revealed no documentation of training as required.On 9/28/23 at approximately 11:00 a.m., the staff development director was requested to provide the completed training for Contracted Staff #10; however, he was unable to provide the docum.. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to ensure there was a readily available roster of current residents along with a diagram showing room locations, affecting 41 current residents.This deficiency was cited previously during a state licensure survey 10/5/22. Although the residence corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the residence has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement.Findings include:On 9/28/23 at 8:07 a.m., a resident roster was requested. On 9/28/23 at 8:28 a.m., the administrator provided a list of residents, their room numbers and emergency contact information. However, there was no diagram that showed room locations. On 9/28/23 at approximately 4:30 p.m., the administrator stated she was not aware that a residence diagr.. Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally
A relicensure survey with complaint #CO33334 was completed on 9/28/23. Deficiencies were cited. Based on interview and record review the residence failed to, either directly or indirectly, through a resident agreement, provide personal services, affecting one of seven sample residents (#16).Findings include:1. Reference and Residence Policiesa. Chapter VII regulations governing assisted living residences, in part two, defines "Personal Servic.. Based on observation and interview, the residence failed to place in a visible on-site location the residence' s internal process for raising and addressing grievances and complaints, along with full contact information for required agencies, affecting 41 current residents. Findings include:The residence consisted of a main lobby area with two sep.. Based on observation and interview, the residence failed to place notices of planned resident engagement offerings in a central location readily accessible to residents, affecting 41 current residents.Findings include:The residence had two separate secure environments; East and West side. On 9/28/23 from approximately 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., ther.. Based on observation, record review and interview, the residence failed to ensure qualified medication administration persons (QMAPs) followed national recognized protocols for basic infection control and prevention when preparing and administering medications, affecting three of three sample residents (#14, #21,#22) during medication pass. Findings.. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to arrange discharge to a resident who posed a danger to self and the assisted living residence was unable to sufficiently address those issues through therapeutic approach and needed more services than could be routinely provided by the assisted living residence or an external service provide.. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to comply with authorized practitioner orders associated with medication administration, affecting three of six sample residents (#14, #17, #20).Findings include:1. Residence PolicyThe residence' s Basic Care Services policy, dated May 2017, read in part, "Medications are to be given accordin.. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to ensure a Colorado Adult Protective Services Data Systems (CAPS) check was performed prior to hiring one of three sample staff (#33) who provided direct care to at-risk residents, for one of three sample staff (#8), affecting 41 current residents. Findings include:1. .. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to ensure a name-based criminal history record check that was conducted by the Colorado Bureau of Investigation (CBI) was completed for each prospective employee prior to staff hire, for three of three sample staff (#8-#10), affecting 41 current residents.Findings include: Review of t.. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to ensure each personnel file included orientation and training and results of background checks, for three of three sample staff (#8-#10), affecting 41 current residents.Findings include:The residence' s personnel files for Staff #8 and Contracted Staff #10 revealed no documen.. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to ensure there was a readily available roster of current residents along with a diagram showing room locations, affecting 41 current residents.This deficiency was cited previously during a state licensure survey 10/5/22. Although the residence corrected the deficiency, based on the fin.. THIS PORTION OF THE REPORT IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.No response is necessary.The residence was advised it must review and maintain the following processes in accordance with existing program regulations found at 6 CCR 1011-1, Chapter 7.7.8 The assisted living residence shall ensure that each staff member and volunteer receives..
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
74 reviews from families & visitors
Official Website
Visit anthemmemorycare.com
CO CDPHE — View Official Record
Public-record source of inspection history and licensure data shown on this page
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Morningstar Assisted Living of Littleton
< 1 miAssisted Living · Littleton, CO
Rmcc
< 1 miAssisted Living · Littleton, CO
Nourish Assisted Living at Brandt, LLC
1.2 miAssisted Living · Littleton, CO
Sun Valley Assisted Living
1.3 miAssisted Living · Littleton, CO
Bright Sun Assisted Living LLC
1.3 miAssisted Living · Littleton, CO
Manor on Marston Lake LLC, the
1.7 miAssisted Living · Littleton, CO