White Dove Assisted Living Home
Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight compassionate and attentive caregivers. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 13 Google reviews
Watch White Dove Assisted Living Home
Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.
We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
What this means for your family
This facility is excellent for families seeking a home-like atmosphere with high-quality, homemade meals and attentive care. However, because of past reports of aggressive management behavior, you should personally observe staff interactions during your visits to ensure the environment remains respectful.
Google Reviews
Google Reviews
13 reviews analyzed“White Dove Assisted Living Home is highly regarded for its compassionate, family-oriented care and homemade meals. While most families praise the attentive staff and clean environment, one reviewer reported significant issues with staff attitude and unprofessionalism.”
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
- Compassionate and attentive caregivers
- High-quality homemade meals
- Clean and well-maintained environment
- Warm, family-like atmosphere
Concerns
- Unprofessional and aggressive staff behavior (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution
How They Respond to Reviews
This facility rarely responds to reviews.
Questions for Your Tour
- 1We've heard wonderful things about the homemade meals here; could you tell us more about the daily menu and how much input residents have in food choices?
- 2The atmosphere here seems so warm and family-like; how do the caregivers build personal connections with the residents to maintain that feeling?
- 3Could you describe the training your staff undergoes to ensure every interaction is handled with the utmost professionalism and kindness?
- 4What kind of daily activities or social outings are available to help residents stay engaged and active within the community?
- 5In the event of a medical emergency during the night, what is the specific protocol for getting care to a resident immediately?
- 6We noticed you are active in managing the home; how do you typically communicate with families regarding any changes in a resident's well-being?
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The caregivers were very compassionate, attentive and diligent in regards to her every need. She was always bathed, dressed and her bedding clean as well as her room and the rest of the home. Meals were always freshly made each day.”
“The owner, Nellie, and the caregiver Alina, were remarkable with their solid commitment to taking care and nurturing everyone in the home, including the family members of the residents.”
“My mother lived here for five years. They took such good care of her. It felt like home. All home cooked meals, family atmosphere. Chickens in the back yard coop.”
State Inspection History
State Inspections
Source: AZ State Licensing Agency
Sep 15, 2025RoutineCleanReport
No deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection conducted on September 15, 2025.
Apr 18, 2024Routine
The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection conducted on April 18, 2024:
Based on interview, record review, and documentation review, the manager failed to ensure policies and procedures were established and documented to protect the health and safety of a resident covering job descriptions, duties, and qualifications, including required skills and knowledge, education, and experience for employees and volunteers for four of four employees. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility did not establish a procedure to ensure personnel members possessed the required skills and knowledge to perform required job duties. Findings include: 1. A review of facility documentation revealed no policy and procedure covering job descriptions, duties, and qualifications, including required skills and knowledge, education, and experience for employees and volunteers. 2. Review of personnel records for E1, E2, E3, and E4 showed no documentation of verification of the employees' skills and knowledge. 3. In an interview, E1 stated that the facility did not have a skills and knowledge section in their policies and procedures and there was no verification of skills and knowledge for E1, E2, E3, and E4.
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a caregiver's skills and knowledge were verified and documented before the caregiver provided physical health services for four of four employees. The deficient practice posed a risk as no qualified employee was present to meet a resident's needs. Findings include: 1. Review of personnel records for E1, E2, E3, and E4 showed no documentation of verification of the employees' skills and knowledge. 2. In an interview, E1 stated that there was no verification of skills and knowledge for E1, E2, E3, and E4.
Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure there was a means of exiting the facility for a resident who did not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort, that provided access to an outside area, and controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unaware of the general or specific whereabouts of a resident. Findings include: 1. Review of the license issued by the Department revealed the facility was authorized to provide directed care services. 2. During an environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed three doors to the south of the facility that were not alarmed to notify employees of resident egress. 3. In an interview, E1 confirmed that the three doors to the south of the facility were not alarmed.
Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a refrigerator contained a thermometer which was accurate to plus or minus 3\'b0 F, placed at the warmest part of the refrigerator. Findings include: 1. The Compliance Officer observed a refrigerator to the west of the kitchen which did not contain a thermometer. This refrigerator contained food for the residents. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged that the refrigerator to the west of the kitchen did not contain a thermometer.
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that the premises and equipment used at the assisted living facility were free from a condition or situation that may cause a resident or other individual to suffer physical injury. The deficient practice posed potential dangers to residents. Findings include: 1. During an environmental inspection of the facility with E1, the Compliance Officer observed the following: -An unlocked shed containing unsecured items including medical equipment and exposed nails. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the situations listed above may cause residents to suffer physical injury.
Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure that oxygen container was stored in an upright and secured position. The deficient practice posed a potential explosion or leak of a compressed gas. Findings include: 1. The Compliance Officer observed an upright and unsecured oxygen tank in the garage of the facility. 2. The Compliance Officer observed this oxygen tank through an unlocked door which gave residents direct access to the oxygen tank. 3. In an interview, E1 confirmed that the oxygen tank was accessible to residents and was not in a secured position.
Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure toxic materials stored by the facility were stored in a locked area and inaccessible to residents. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident. Findings include: 1. During the environmental tour with E1, the Compliance Officers observed the following: -One can of Lysol spray unsecured in a common bathroom cabinet. -Containers of febreeze, pledge, and hydrogen peroxide found in a caregiver's bathroom which was accessible to residents. -Sheetrock, wood filler, and insecticide in a garage that was accessible to residents. -Liquid Nails found in a drawer in the main area of the home which was accessible to residents. -WD40 found in a hallway closet in a duffle bag which was accessible to residents. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged toxic materials were stored and unlocked in the described locations.
Contact
Get in Touch
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
References & Resources
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
13 reviews from families & visitors
Medicare data downloads
Original nursing home datasets
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Nearby Alternatives
Hellens Adult Care Home
1.1 miAssisted Living · Glendale, AZ
Comfort Home Care LLC
2.2 miAssisted Living · Peoria, AZ
Legend Ddd Services - Pontiac
2.2 miAdult Family Home · Peoria, AZ
Prince of Peace Assisting Living LLC
2.7 miAssisted Living · Peoria, AZ
Mcare LLC
3.8 miAssisted Living · Peoria, AZ
Legend Ddd Services - Elwood Nsgh
4.8 miAdult Family Home · Peoria, AZ