Strong Medicare quality ratings; public reviewers often praise highly effective physical and occupational therapy teams. Still worth an in-person visit.
based on 198 Google reviews
Email Shea Post Acute Rehabilitation Center to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Shea Post Acute Rehabilitation Center has a strong overall Medicare rating. Public reviewers frequently mention: highly effective physical and occupational therapy teams and attentive and compassionate individual nursing staff. Review the component ratings and current source records before deciding.
Shea Post Acute Rehabilitation Center receives highly polarized feedback, with many reviewers praising the physical therapy team and nursing staff for facilitating successful recoveries, while a significant number of others report severe neglect, poor hygiene, and communication failures. Families frequently express frustration over call light response times, medication errors, and the poor quality of food. While some families feel their loved ones received life-changing care, others describe a facility that is understaffed, unhygienic, and unresponsive to urgent medical needs.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 209 analyzed
This facility rarely responds to reviews.
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The therapy team, nursing teams and overall the entire staff at shea parc are committed to providing to best possible care patient care!!”
“My dad has been there for less than a week and he just witnessed a nurse/aid whatever she is sneak in and turn off his call button without asking my dad what he needed!”
“The wound care team is tops! They really care and have done amazing work on me. The physical therapy team is outstanding!”
Both RN and total nursing hours are below the EveryPlace reference benchmarks. Ask the facility how it staffs each shift for current resident needs.
Reference benchmarks (0.75 RN and 4.1 total nursing hours per resident/day) are comparison targets, not current federal minimum requirements.
Resident outcomes compared with national, state, and local averages · 17 measures
16
measures
1
measures
Residents on antipsychotic medication
Residents with depression symptoms
Highly dependent on how each facility screens and codes depressive symptoms, so it varies widely between facilities.
Residents vaccinated for pneumonia
Residents needing more daily help over time
Residents whose bladder or bowel control got worse
Residents vaccinated for the flu
Short-stay residents vaccinated for the flu
Short-stay residents vaccinated for pneumonia
Short-stay residents newly given antipsychotics
US average from Medicare published data
Detailed Medicare record · up to 3-year lookback
Families have filed complaints leading to deficiencies, including a recent December 2024 finding regarding resident protection from abuse and neglect. The facility has recurring issues with care planning and assessment, daily living assistance, and resident rights spanning multiple surveys from 2022-2024. While all identified deficiencies show correction dates, the pattern of repeated problems in core care areas and complaint-triggered investigations warrants careful consideration during your visit.
Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Infection Control Deficiencies
Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Source: AZ State Licensing Agency
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed properly maintain doors. Failure to properly maintain maintenance could lead to harm to residents and staff in the event of an emergency.
An onsite complaint survey was conducted on April 22, 2025 for the investigation of intake # 00126029, AZ00188801, AZ00188825, and AZ0018988. There were no deficiencies cited.
An onsite complaint survey was conducted on March 04, 2025 for the investigation of intake # AZ00223142, 00115600, AZ00190020, AZ00190025, AZ00189956, AZ00189300. There were no deficiencies cited.
An onsite complaint survey was conducted on January 28, 2025 for the investigation of intakes #AZ00222004; AZ00222458. There were no deficiencies cited.
42 CFR483.41 (a) Nursing Home The facility must meet the applicable provisions of the 2012 Edition of the Life Safety Code of the National Fire Protection Association. This is a recertification survey for Medicare under LSC 2012, Chapter 19 existing nursing home. No apparent deficiencies noted at the time of the survey conducted on December 18, 2024.
The recertification survey was conducted on December/10/2024 through December/13/2024, in conjunction with the investigation of complaints #AZ00207673 AZ00207228 AZ00203369 AZ00200918 AZ00199653 AZ00195852 AZ00187769 AZ00187718 AZ00187644 AZ00187645 AZ00199579 AZ00213234 AZ00207615 AZ00207181 AZ00206611 AZ00205534 AZ00200877 The following deficiencies were cited:
Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two residents (#71 and #51) were free from abuse from other residents ( #263 AND #261). Findings include: Regarding Resident #51 and #261: - Regarding Resident #51: Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on September 5, 2023 with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, cognitive functions, traumatic brain injury and bipolar disorder. A review of the residents current MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated August 29, 2024, revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 00, which indicates severe cognitive impairment. - Regarding Resident #261: Resident #261 was admitted to the facility on January 9, 2024 with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation and major depressive disorder. A review of the residents current MDS, dated January 16, 2024, revealed a BIMS score of 14, which indicates no cognitive impairment. A facility reported incident was reported to the state agency claiming a staff member had witnessed an inappropriate interaction between two residents. The report stated that resident #261's hand was on the left thigh, under the shorts of resident #51. An interview was conducted on December 11, 2024 at 11:22 AM with staff member #42. She stated that on Thursday, February 29, 2024 at approximately 12:00 PM she was walking down the hall looking around, walking past the day room where she saw resident #261 with his hand on resident #51's left thigh but it was under resident #51's shorts. She stated she stopped and was shocked at what she saw, and as soon as resident #261 realized staff #42 saw it, he immediately removed his hand from under resident #51's shorts. She stated she separated them and went to the DON (Director of Nursing) and the ED (Executive Director) and told them what she saw. Review of a physician's progress note dated February 29, 2024 at 12:55 PM stated "Staff reported that the patient was found resting his hand on another resident's thigh recently. When asked about this, the patient states that he placed his hand on his thigh but did not touch any other areas of the patient's body. Staff made the DON aware who reported this incident. Both the DON and I had a lengthy conversation with the patient regarding inappropriate behaviors to include touching someone on their thigh without consent and the patient understands and states that he will not do this again. The patient appears apologetic for his actions." An interview was conducted on December 12, 2024 at 8:54 AM with Social Services Director (staff #163). She stated that resident #261 said he was only trying to comfort resident #51 because he was tremoring. She stated even though his hand was under his shorts, he claimed he was only trying to comfort him. When she asked why resident #261 was discharged to another facility on March 7, 2024, staff #163 stated that it was a direct result of the incident. Regarding Resident #71 and Resident # 263: - Regardi
An onsite complaint survey was conducted on October 28, 2024 for the investigation of intake # AZ00217782. There were no deficiencies cited.
An onsite complaint survey was conducted on July 5, 2024 for the investigation of intake # AZ00212694. There were no deficiencies cited.
Shea Post Acute Rehabilitation Center
for profit
The Ensign Group
346 facilities nationwide
Chain avg rating: 3.2/5 · Rank 1 of 328 (Highest rating)
Key personnel
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
Medicare Care Compare
Official Medicare quality ratings, inspections & staffing data
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
198 reviews from families & visitors
Official Website
Visit sheaparc.com
Medicare data downloads
Original nursing home datasets
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Amber Creek Memory Care Community
< 1 miAssisted Living · Scottsdale, AZ
The Ranch Estates at Scottsdale
< 1 miAssisted Living · Scottsdale, AZ
Gardens Care Senior Living Scottsdale
< 1 miAssisted Living · Scottsdale, AZ
Scottsdale Silver Lining
< 1 miAssisted Living · Scottsdale, AZ
Life Care Center of Scottsdale
< 1 miNursing Home · Scottsdale, AZ
Hands of Care
< 1 miAssisted Living · Scottsdale, AZ