Strong Medicare quality ratings; public reviewers often praise exceptional physical and occupational therapy programs. Still worth an in-person visit.
based on 547 Google reviews

Email Sante of Mesa to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
These current public-data fields deserve follow-up with the facility and the official Medicare record. They are not a clinical risk score or a substitute for an in-person assessment.
2 findings in latest survey
Sante of Mesa has a strong overall Medicare rating. RN hours meet the EveryPlace reference benchmark, which is one useful staffing signal to discuss during a visit. Public reviewers frequently mention: exceptional physical and occupational therapy programs and warm, attentive, and professional nursing staff. Review the component ratings and current source records before deciding.
Sante of Mesa is widely praised for its exceptional rehabilitation therapy team and a highly attentive nursing staff that many families describe as compassionate and professional. While the majority of reviews are glowing, a small but vocal group of families reports serious concerns regarding neglect, inconsistent care between day and night shifts, and slow response times for basic patient needs. Families considering this facility should weigh the strong clinical outcomes against these reports of inconsistent staffing and communication.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 257 analyzed
This facility actively engages with reviewer feedback.
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The caring staff, excellent skilled nursing along with PT/OT made my Mother’s stay at this facility exceptional!! The staff helped my Mother feel safe and were very respectful caring for her. The facility was very clean, quiet and well maintained.”
“My mom has been in and out of hospitals and rehab centers, so we’ve unfortunately learned the difference between the good ones and the not-so-good ones — and this is definitely one of the good ones.”
“The staff turnover is awful. Never the same aides or nurses. As a family member, you basically have to be there all day with your loved one to remind the staff about their specific needs, and to make sure they're doing what they're supposed to do.”
This facility meets both EveryPlace staffing reference benchmarks. Higher staffing is generally associated with stronger day-to-day care.
Reference benchmarks (0.75 RN and 4.1 total nursing hours per resident/day) are comparison targets, not current federal minimum requirements.
Resident outcomes compared with national, state, and local averages · 10 measures
7
measures
3
measures
Residents on anti-anxiety or sleep medication
Residents vaccinated for pneumonia
Residents who lost too much weight
Residents who fell and were seriously hurt
Residents who got a urinary tract infection
Residents with pressure sores (bedsores)
Short-stay residents vaccinated for pneumonia
Short-stay residents vaccinated for the flu
Short-stay residents newly given antipsychotics
US average from Medicare published data
Detailed Medicare record · up to 3-year lookback
Families have filed complaints that led to citations, including issues with dialysis care safety and failure to report suspected abuse properly. The facility shows recurring problems with resident rights (including visitation and treatment decisions), medication management, and abuse reporting across multiple surveys from 2021-2025. While all deficiencies have correction dates, the pattern of repeated issues in key care areas suggests ongoing challenges with maintaining consistent standards.
Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Smoke Deficiencies
Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies
Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Federal Penalties
Fine
Sep 5, 2023
$3,146
Source: AZ State Licensing Agency
The state risk based survey was conducted October 23, 2025 in conjunction with the investigation of complaints: AZ00161381/2278158, AZ00168869/2278107, AZ00177824/2278172, AZ00177825/2278173, AZ00180497/2278181, AZ00182234/2278185, and AZ00183178/2278186There were no deficiencies noted.
Violation cited
The complaint survey was conducted on October 16, 2024 through October 16, 2024 of the following complaint #'s AZ00216706 and AZ00216777. No deficiencies were cited.
42 CFR483.41 (a) Nursing Home The facility must meet the applicable provisions of the 2012 Edition of the Life Safety Code of the National Fire Protection Association. This is a recertification survey for Medicare 2012, Chapter 19 existing nursing home. The entire facility was surveyed on September 11, 2024. The facility meets the standards, based upon compliance with all provisions of the standards No apparent deficiencies were found during the survey.
The onsite investigation of complaint AZ00215637 and AZ00215738 was conducted on September 11, 2024. No deficiencies were cited.
Amended 2567: The state compliance survey was conducted September 03, 2024 through September 06, 2024 in conjunction the investigation of complaint(s) AZ00215422, AZ00193369,AZ00191191, AZ00189364, AZ00188462. The following deficiencies were cited:
Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure pain medications were administered in accordance with the physician's orders for one resident (#15). The deficient practice could result in the resident receiving unnecessary medication and being overmedicated. Findings include: Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on July 4, 2023 with diagnoses of a fracture of shaft of right fibula, fracture of shaft of right tibia, and acquired absence of left hip joint. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated June 20, 2024 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident is cognitively intact. A physician's order dated May 9, 2024 indicated Oxycodone HCI (narcotic analgesic) Oral Tablet 5 milligrams (mg) was to be given by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain between 6-10 on a 0-10 pain scale. A review of the July and August medication administration record (MAR) revealed that oxycodone was not being administered within the pain parameters established by the physician. For the month of July 2024, oxycodone was administered below the required pain rating of 6-10 thirty-three times. For the month of August 2024, oxycodone was administered below the required pain rating of 6-10 thirty-two times. The clinical record revealed no documentation of the reason why oxycodone was administered outside of the parameters established by the physician's orders and that the physician was not notified. An interview was conducted with staff #110 (Registered Nurse) on September 6, 2024 at 9:58 AM. Staff # 110 indicated that pain medications are given to residents after a pain assessment is done. During the pain assessment a resident identifies how much pain they are having using a pain scale to determine if they are eligible to take the specific pain medication. Staff #110 explained that she will look at the medication order and it would specify when to give the medication to the resident. Staff #110 reviewed the August MAR for resident #15 and indicated that the oxycodone was not administered within parameters. When asked what the risk would be to the resident when administering oxycodone outside of parameters, staff #110 indicated that they would not be doing what would be best for the resident and they would not be treating the pain as prescribed by the physician. An interview was conducted on September 6, 2024 at 10:31 AM with staff #34 (Director of Nursing). Staff #34 indicated that when a resident asks for pain medications, the nurse is to ensure there is an order then ask the resident what they rated their pain as, and then identify the symptoms that indicates the resident is in pain. When reviewing the August MAR for resident #15, staff # 34 stated they saw multiple administrations being done outside of the ordered parameters. Staff #34 indicated that the nurse did not administer pain medication according to
Based on the reviewing of staff list, census, record review and interview facility failed to ensure that a Registered Nurse (RN) severed 8 consecutive hours in the day.The deficit practice would result resident care not being property given in need of a registered nurse. Reviews of daily staff revealed that an RN was not present during the 8 hours in the day for 8 different dates. On May 19, 2024 the Census was 58 no RN coverage for day and night. On July 01, 2024 Census was 68 no RN coverage for the day for 8 hours. At the August 05, 2024 census there was 68 no RN coverage for the day for 8 hours. On August 06,2024 census was 66 for the day for 8 hours, August 12, 2024 the census was 69 and no RN coverage for 8 hours of the day. August 19,2024 census 67 no RN coverage for the day for 8 hours. August 27, 2024 census 64 no RN coverage for the day for 8 hours. September 01, 2024 census 59 no RN coverage for 8 of the day. Upon further review of the daily staffing list provided to the surveyor, Director of Nursing or Assistant of Director of Nursing are not listed on the daily staffing list. Interview with staff # 52 Certified Nurse Assistant CNA September 05, 2024 1:35PM. Typically I would get 11-12 residents under my care. I don't stay over time when working. If my coverage isn t here on time we would document and report our task and care that we have given to residents. This will help the next person taking over when we leave for the day. We can communicate with staff verbally and put reports within the chart. Call devices are given to residents and they can put them on their neck or they can have it near them on the table. We have in-service training and staff meetings to help us learn. Interview with Staff # 34 Director of Nursing (DON) on September 06, 2024 at 2:29 PM, the DON stated if we don't have an RN 8 hours of the day, the Director of Nursing or Assistant Director of Nursing would cover during those days. The Director of Nursing would work Monday - Friday. Our coverage is not based on the census, and if someone calls off the Director of Nursing or Assistant Director of Nursing would cover. We do what we can with what we have. Policy review of staffing had revealed 24 hours of the day a Licensed Nurses need to be able to provide direct resident services .
Based on clinical record review, interview, review of policies and procedures, the facility failed to notify the ombudsman of transfer or discharge. Resident # 70 was admitted to the facility on May 20, 2024 with diagnoses that include adult failure to thrive, HTN, BPH, Anemia. Resident # 70 was discharged 06/25/2024. Resident # 70 needs supervision or touching assistance with: eating, oral hygiene, and personal hygiene. Resident # 70 needs substantial/maximal assistance with: upper body dressing, lower body dressing, putting on/taking on foot wear, roll left and right, sit to lying, chair/bed-to-chair transfer. The care plan revealed Resident #70 was monitored for any change of conditions. If any change were to occur it would be reported to their provider. Resident # 70 is at risk for altered fluid balance r/t Poor intake, feeding tube. Resident # 70 has oral thrush and antifungal. Progress notes on June 14, 2024 revealed Resident # 70 is progressing with their therapy and was going to be discharged to an acute rehab center. There was no date or time that resident discharge was completed in progress notes or that the ombudsman was notified. Staff #66 Care Manager LPN said the resident was the main point of contact for plan of care and discharge plan. Resident # 70 was provided admission orders, baseline care plan and discussion held on Resident # 70 goals, expectation, and treatment. Resident #70 was informed of their treatment orders, dietary orders, medications, and therapy services. If there are any changes care plan will be notified to Resident # 70. Resident # 70 had verbalized in understanding their care plan and agreed to the care plan. Interview with staff # 167 Care Manager Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on 09/05/2024 at 8:44AM revealed Resident # 70 was transferred to an acute rehab unsure of the reason. Since this was an emergency transfer there were no documents signed by resident or on the resident behalf of this transfer. Interview with staff # 66 Care manager Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on 09/05/2024 at 9:17AM revealed an Ombudsman would only be notified if there is a problem. Since this is not a discharge a discharge packet was not given to resident #70. This was a skilled nursing facility to a skilled nursing facility transfer. An email or fax of everything needed would have be given to the receiving facility. On 09/06/2024 at 8:44AM the Administrator said the process of discharge would normally be if a resident had requested for a change in facility they would give the resident a list of facilities. With this list we will help residents pick out a facility that they would like. In this case this Resident # 70 wife wanted to go to a different facility prior to coming to this facility. At the time Resident # 70 was not qualified for that particular facility. Resident # 70 would start off with a lower level rehab to build on their strength like this facility. During Resident # 70 times here, they were recovering quite well. Res
An onsite complaint survey was conducted on July 8, 2024 for the investigation of intake #s AZ00212312, AZ00203581, AZ00200491, AZ00198118, AZ00197277. There were no deficiencies cited.
The complaint survey was conducted on April 17, 2024 for the investigation of intake #AZ00209061. The following deficiency was cited.
Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility documentation, policy and procedure, the facility failed to maintian highest practicable well-being by failing to ensure dialysis assessments were completed and transportation to dialysis appointments was arranged for one of 3 sampled residents (#4). Findings include: The facility's contract with the Dialysis Facility, signed and dated 10/18/2023, it included that the facility shall be responsible for arranging transportation of residents to and from Dialysis Facility, including all transportation costs and expenses. Long term care facility shall be responsible for ensuring that residents are (i) medically stable to undergo such transportation, (ii) medically suitable to receive treatment at Dialysis Facility, and (iii) timely transported to and from Dialysis Facility. Resident (#4) was admitted April 8, 2024 with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease (CKD), CKD with Heart Failure and Stage 5 CKD or end stage renal disease A physician order dated April 8, 2024 included for dialysis three times a week on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays; and, the chair time would be from 11:50am to 3:20pm with an arrival time of 11:30am. Another physician order dated April 8, 2024 revealed an order to complete pre-dialysis and post-dialysis assessments every day shift on every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. A progress note dated April 9, 2024 included that the care manager met with the resident and family for an admission intake review that covered review of all medications, treatment orders, dietary orders, therapy services and all other interventions or services ordered at the time of admission. A review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for April 2024 included that a post dialysis assessment was documented as completed on April 10 and 12, 2024. However, the documentation from the dialysis center revealed that the resident did not receive dialysis on April 10, 2024. A progress note dated April 10, 2024 revealed that the resident was sent to the Emergency Room (ER) at 2:45 p.m. The progress note dated April 11, 2024 revealed that the resident returned to the facility at 12:05 a.m. Per the documentation, the family were upset because resident #4 was not scheduled for dialysis on April 11, 2024. Further, the documentation included that the family took the resident to the dialysis center on April 11, 2024 at 5:00 a.m.; and that, the facility agreed to schedule transport to pick the resident from dialysis to return to the nursing facility. Further review of the clinical record revealed no documentation of reason why transportation to dialysis appointment was not arranged for resident #4. In an interview with the licensed practical nurse (LPN/staff #90) conducted on April 17, 2024 at 3:00 p.m., the LPN (#90) stated that they did not complete any post dialysis assessment for resident #4 even if it was on the TAR. LPN (#90) stated that pre- and po
Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview, and facility documentation, policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure dialysis assessments were completed and transportation to dialysis appointments was arranged for one of three sampled residents (#4). The deficient practice could result in the resident missing dialysis treatment and developing renal complications. Findings include: The facility's contract with the Dialysis Facility, signed and dated 10/18/2023, it included that the facility shall be responsible for arranging transportation of residents to and from Dialysis Facility, including all transportation costs and expenses. Long term care facility shall be responsible for ensuring that residents are (i) medically stable to undergo such transportation, (ii) medically suitable to receive treatment at Dialysis Facility, and (iii) timely transported to and from Dialysis Facility. Resident (#4) was admitted April 8, 2024 with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease (CKD), CKD with Heart Failure and Stage 5 CKD or end stage renal disease A physician order dated April 8, 2024 included for dialysis three times a week on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays; and, the chair time would be from 11:50am to 3:20pm with an arrival time of 11:30am. Another physician order dated April 8, 2024 revealed an order to complete pre-dialysis and post-dialysis assessments every day shift on every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. A progress note dated April 9, 2024 included that the care manager met with the resident and family for an admission intake review that covered review of all medications, treatment orders, dietary orders, therapy services and all other interventions or services ordered at the time of admission. A review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for April 2024 included that a post dialysis assessment was documented as completed on April 10 and 12, 2024. However, the documentation from the dialysis center revealed that the resident did not receive dialysis on April 10, 2024. A progress note dated April 10, 2024 revealed that the resident was sent to the Emergency Room (ER) at 2:45 p.m. The progress note dated April 11, 2024 revealed that the resident returned to the facility at 12:05 a.m. Per the documentation, the family were upset because resident #4 was not scheduled for dialysis on April 11, 2024. Further, the documentation included that the family took the resident to the dialysis center on April 11, 2024 at 5:00 a.m.; and that, the facility agreed to schedule transport to pick the resident from dialysis to return to the nursing facility. Further review of the clinical record revealed no documentation of reason why transportation to dialysis appointment was not arranged for resident #4. In an interview with the licensed practical nurse (LPN/staff #90) conducted on April 17, 2024 at 3:00 p.m., the LPN (#90) stated that they did not complete any post dialysis assessment for resident
Sante of Mesa
for profit
Sante
5 facilities nationwide
Chain avg rating: 4.4/5 · Rank 1 of 5 (Highest rating)
Owners
Leach Family Revocable Trust Dated 2/25/24
Owner · Organization
Munch Tooke, LLC
Owner · Organization
Sp Mesa, LLC
Owner · Organization
Munch Tooke, LLC
Owner (parent company) · Organization
Rdw Arizona LLC
Owner (parent company) · Organization
Sp Re Development LLC
Owner (parent company) · Organization
Sterling & Jacqueline Holdings,llc
Owner (parent company) · Organization
Hansen, Charles
Owner (parent company)
Munch, Michael
Owner (parent company)
Schaefer, Jacob
Owner (parent company)
Sante Partners II LLC
Owner (parent company) · Organization
Ficek, Gregory
Owner (parent company)
Kennedy, Patricia
Owner (parent company)
Key personnel
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
Medicare Care Compare
Official Medicare quality ratings, inspections & staffing data
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
547 reviews from families & visitors
Official Website
Visit santecares.com
Medicare data downloads
Original nursing home datasets
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Savanna House
< 1 miAssisted Living · Gilbert, AZ
Well Life Care Homes - Feather
< 1 miAssisted Living · Gilbert, AZ
Benzen Healing Hands
< 1 miAssisted Living · Gilbert, AZ
A Place of Joy Assisted Living
< 1 miAssisted Living · Mesa, AZ
Higley House Care Home, LLC
< 1 miAssisted Living · Gilbert, AZ
Silver Creek Inn Memory Care Community
1.0 miAssisted Living · Mesa, AZ