See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Assisted Living

Rosa's Chante Assisted Living Home

Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight attentive and caring staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.

2631 South Blackmoon Drive, South Harrison · Tucson, AZ 85730Licensed & Active
Google rating
4.2/5

based on 10 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1

Watch Rosa's Chante Assisted Living Home

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

This facility offers a warm, festive atmosphere with a highly dedicated management team. However, families should inquire about recent improvements to meal quality and facility odor control to ensure these issues have been addressed.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

10 reviews analyzed
Rosa's Chante is praised for its attentive care, holiday decorations, and an involved owner who maintains a clean environment. However, some reviewers have raised concerns regarding the quality of the food and unpleasant odors within the facility.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food2.0Staff9.0Clean4.0Activities9.0MedsN/AMemoryN/ACommsN/AValueN/A

Strengths

  • Attentive and caring staff
  • Clean and well-maintained environment
  • Engaging holiday decorations and atmosphere
  • Involved and knowledgeable ownership

Concerns

  • Poor food quality (mentioned by 2 reviewers)

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

2344.32017(3)3.72018(3)4.02019(2)5.02020(2)

Distribution

5
6
4
2
3
1
2
0
1
1

How They Respond to Reviews

0%response rate

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1We love how much care goes into the holiday decorations here; what kind of seasonal activities or special celebrations do the residents participate in throughout the year?
  • 2The ownership seems very involved and knowledgeable based on what we've heard; how often do the owners interact with the residents and families?
  • 3Could you tell us a bit more about the daily dining experience and how the menu is planned to ensure everyone enjoys their meals?
  • 4What steps are in place to ensure the dining area and common spaces remain consistently well-maintained and tidy for the residents?
  • 5In the event of a medical emergency during the night, what is the specific protocol for getting care to a resident?
  • 6How do the staff members ensure they are providing that attentive, personalized care that the facility is known for?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

this place goes out of their way to decorate for every holiday to make the residents feel at home! Even the outside patio gets Christmas trees!

Long-term resident's family · 2018★★★★★

The food is well rounded, the activities are excellent, Anthony is giving and caring and makes sure residents get their needs taken care of.

Contractor/Family member · 2017★★★★★

This place is well run and was very clean. The owner is involved in his place and knows what is going on in the community.

Community member · 2017★★★★
Source: 10 Google reviews

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: AZ State Licensing Agency

2total
2deficiencies
Dec 23, 2025Complaint

The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection and investigation of complaint 00154052 conducted on December 23,2025:

Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge documentA.R.S. § 36-420.04.CCorrected Jan 30, 2026

Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the assisted living home failed to maintain a standardized form for each resident which included the information prescribed in subsection A of this section, and failed to periodically update the form as necessary. The deficient practice posed a risk to resident health as an out of date list of medications was provided to emergency responders. Findings include: 1. A review of R2's medical record revealed an incident report, dated December 20, 2025 at 12:35 PM. The incident report form stated, "pt coughing at table...called 911, difficulty breathing- presented DNR, pt had a pulse, EMS placed on floor patio, begin CPR then stopped. TPD responded / OME responded, OME took body." 2. A review of facility documentation revealed a copy of an emergency responder packet for R2 which consisted of a face sheet, a DNR form, and a medication list. However, the document did not include the reason for contacting emergency medical services, and did not include the pharmacy address or a statement whether R2 required medication services. Additionally, the attached list of medications was dated June 12, 2024 and included the following medications: "Zyprexa 5 MG PO BID, Lisinopril 20 MG PO QD, Buspirone 10 MG PO BID, Eliquis 2.5 MG PO BID, and Tylenlol, 325 MG PO 4HRS/PRN." 3. A review of R2's medical record revealed a list of medication orders, dated September 30, 2025, which included the following medications, "Olanzapine 7.5 MG PO BID, Lisinopril 20 MG PO BID, Buspirone 10 MG PO TID, Low Dose Aspirin 81 MG, PO QD, Tylenol 325 MG PO 4 HRS/PRN, Mirtazapine 30 MG PO QD, and Depakote 125 MG PO BID." 4. In an exit interview with E1, the findings were reviewed and no additional information was provided.

Medical RecordsR9-10-811.C.1-24Corrected Feb 27, 2026

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's medical record contained documentation of the resident’s needs required in R9-10-807(B), documentation of freedom from infectious tuberculosis as required in R9-10-807(A), or documentation of the determination in R9-10-812(3), for one of two sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs and false or misleading information was provided to the Department. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a baseline screening for Tuberculosis form. The form was dated one day prior to R1's date of acceptance. However, the form had a photocopied signature of a medical practitioner, and the rest of the form, including the date of the medical practitioner's signature, was filled out with a blue pen. 2. A review of R1's medical record revealed a form titled "Determination for Admission," which covered R9-10-807(B). The form was dated one day prior to R1's date of acceptance. However, the form had a photocopied signature of a medical practitioner, and the rest of the form, including the date of the medical practitioner's signature, was filled out with a blue pen. 3. A review of R1's medical record revealed a form titled "Approval for Behavioral Care," which covered R9-10-812(3). The form was dated one day prior to R1's date of acceptance. However, the form had a photocopied signature of a medical practitioner, and the rest of the form, including the date of the medical practitioner's signature, was filled out with a blue pen. Additionally, the date the medical practitioner had allegedly examined R1 had been left blank. 4. A review of R1's medical record revealed a second set of all three aforementioned documents which appeared to have an original signature and date by the same medical practitioner, except for the Determination for Admission, which was signed but not dated. However, all three documents were dated 14 days after R1's date of acceptance. 5. In an exit interview with E1, the findings were reviewed and no additional information was provided.

Mar 28, 2024Routine
CleanReport

No deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection conducted on March 28, 2024. Based on this deficiency-free compliance inspection, the Department shall not conduct a compliance inspection for twenty-four months, according to A.R.S. \'a7 36-425(E). Subsection (E) does not prohibit the Department from enforcing licensing requirements as authorized by A.R.S. \'a7 36-424.

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call