Public Google reviewers rate this highly and often mention compassionate, family-oriented care. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 7 Google reviews
Email Paradise Assisted Living Home LLC to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Public Google reviewers rate Paradise Assisted Living Home LLC highly. Reviewers highlight: compassionate, family-oriented care, engaging daily activities and entertainment. Reviewer identity is not verified, and online reviews may not capture everything. Schedule a visit to assess the fit directly.
Families can expect a highly compassionate, family-like environment where staff members treat residents with deep personal care. Reviewers specifically praise the personalized one-on-one attention and the variety of daily activities like music and exercise, though the facility is noted to be a smaller, more intimate setting.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 7 analyzed
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The care and concern that was offered to him was second to none. The staff and the owner owners took care of my Mark like he was part of their own family.”
“They keep the patients busy with activities , music”
“It is small enough that he really got the one-on-one care that he needed. The ladies that attended to him were so sweet and really cared about their patients.”
Source: AZ State Licensing Agency
The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection conducted on August 18, 2025:
Based on observation, documentative review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure an assisted living home had a smoke detector installed in all required areas. The deficient practice posed a risk if safety measures were not in place to protect residents and employees in the event of a fire. Findings include: 1. During the environmental inspection, the Compliance Officers observed that there was no smoke detector in the facility's office that was used to store medical records and medication, and there was no smoke detector installed in an employee's bedroom. 2. The facility's documentation review revealed policies and procedures that stated, "Smoke detectors systems in the Facility that will be kept in working order; hard wire system that is connected into the electrical system of the Facility; and will be installed at a minimum in the following areas: bedrooms, hallways that adjoin bedrooms, attached garages or storage areas, if applicable, rooms, hallways adjacent to kitchen and other locations as required by local authorities." 3 . In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1, and no additional information was provided.
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a medication administered to a resident was administered in compliance with a medication order for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as medication could not be verified as administered as prescribed against a medication order . Findings include: 1 . A review of R1's medical record revealed a signed medication order dated June 3, 2025. This order stated, "Midodrine 5 MG 1 TAB PO TID for BP, hold if BP>130 SYS". 2 . Review of R1's medical record revealed an August 2025 medication administration record (MAR). This MAR revealed administered of Midodrine 5 MG 1 TAB PO TID on the following days at 8AM, 12 PM and 5PM: August 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 25, 16, 17, 18 3 . Review of R1's medical record revealed blood pressure vital statistics flowchart was not properly documented based on the order for Midodrine, 5MG, 1 TAB PO TID for blood pressure, hold if blood pressure is above 130 systolic. There was no recording of blood pressure statistics for the 12PM or 5PM medication administration for the following months: January 2025 February 2025 March 2025 April 2025 May 2025 June 2025 July 2025 August 2025 4 . In an exit interview, findings were discussed with E1 and no additional information was provided.
Based on documentation review, record review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure an individual authorized by policies and procedures to administer an opioid, documented in the resident's medical record the identification of the resident's need for the opioid and the effect of the opioid administered, for one of one resident reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident. Findings include: 1 . A review of the facility's policies and procedures revealed a policy titled Opioid Prescribing and Treatment. This policy stated, "Except for a resident (patient) with a terminal condition as documented by a physician, an individual authorized to administer an opioid shall do the following: 1. Identify the resident's pain before the opioid is administered by using a pain scale table. Ask resident to rate pain level (0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain possible). If resident is unable to communicate, caregiver will document signs and symptoms that lead them to believe that the resident was in need of the opioid medication". 2 . A review of R2's medical record revealed a signed order dated August 11, 2025 for "Tramadol, 50 MG 1 TAB PO Q 6 HRS PRN". 3 . A review of R2's medical record revealed a July 2025 medication administration record (MAR). This MAR revealed no documentation that Tramadol was administered. However, a "controlled drug sign out log" revealed Tramadol was administered on the following dates and times: July 1, 2025, at 8 PM July 6, 2025, at 3 PM July 8, 2025, at 11 PM July 11, 2025, at 2 PM July 13, 2025, at 4 PM July 15, 2025, at 8 PM July 16, 2025, at 9 PM Documentation was not available that showed the identification of R2's need for the opioid and the effect of the opioid administered. 4 . A review of R2's medical record revealed no documentation R2 had an end-of-life condition or active malignancy. 5 . In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1, and no additional information was provided.
No deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection conducted on December 27, 2023. Based on this deficiency-free compliance inspection, the Department shall not conduct a compliance inspection for twenty-four months, according to A.R.S. \'a7 36-425(E). Subsection (E) does not prohibit the Department from enforcing licensing requirements as authorized by A.R.S. \'a7 36-424.
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Avenida Care Home
< 1 miAssisted Living · Peoria, AZ
American Assisted Living, LLC
< 1 miAssisted Living · Peoria, AZ
My Parents Paradise at Montoro Preserve
< 1 miAssisted Living · Peoria, AZ
Noble Hearts Assisted Living LLC
< 1 miAssisted Living · Peoria, AZ
White Dove at Pinnacle Peak
< 1 miAssisted Living · Peoria, AZ
Whispering Wind Assisted Living, LLC
< 1 miAssisted Living · Peoria, AZ