Public Google reviewers rate this highly and often mention compassionate and patient caregiving staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 11 Google reviews
Email Madeira Villa Assisted Living, LLC to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Public Google reviewers rate Madeira Villa Assisted Living, LLC highly. Reviewers highlight: compassionate and patient caregiving staff, high-quality, home-cooked meals. Reviewer identity is not verified, and online reviews may not capture everything. Schedule a visit to assess the fit directly.
Families can expect a highly compassionate, home-like environment where staff members are praised for treating residents like family. Reviewers consistently highlight the exceptional patience of the caregivers, particularly for residents with dementia, and the high quality of the home-cooked meals.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 11 analyzed
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“As Mom’s dementia increased, I know she was often confused and not the easiest resident to accommodate. But everyone at Madeira had endless patience and competence and our Mom got the best of care delivered with grace and care.”
“She gets help with daily routines, eats fantastic meals, participates in activities which include singing, going out for meals, getting her hair cut and celebrating holidays.”
“Patti answered the questions we had before we knew we had them. The level of comfort this provided to family was immeasurable.”
Source: AZ State Licensing Agency
The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection conducted on December 16, 2025:
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) as specified in R9-10-113, for two of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents. Findings include: 1. R9-10-113.A states, "If a health care institution is subject to the requirements of this Section, as specified in an Article in this Chapter, the health care institution's chief administrative officer shall ensure that the health care institution establishes, documents, and implements tuberculosis infection control activities that...2. Include: a. For each individual who is employed by the health care institution, provides volunteer services for the health care institution, or is admitted to the health care institution and who is subject to the requirements of this Section, screening, on or before the date specified in the applicable Article of this Chapter, that consists of: i. Assessing risks of prior exposure to infectious tuberculosis, ii. Determining if the individual has signs or symptoms of tuberculosis, and iii. Obtaining documentation of the individual's freedom from infectious tuberculosis according to subsection (B)(1)..." 2. A review of R1's (admitted 2025) medical record revealed no documentation of a completed screening to assess R1's risk of prior exposure to infectious TB and if R1 had signs or symptoms of TB signed or dated by a medical practitioner, as required. Based on R1's date of admission, this documentation was required. 3. A review of R2's (admitted 2025) medical record revealed no documentation of a completed screening to assess R2's risk of prior exposure to infectious TB and if R2 had signs or symptoms of TB signed or dated by a medical practitioner, as required. Based on R2's date of admission, this documentation was required. 4. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E2, and no additional information was provided.
Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that there was a means of exiting the facility that monitored or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unaware of the general or specific whereabouts of a resident. Findings include: 1. A review of Department documentation revealed the facility was licensed to provide directed care services. 2. During an environmental tour of the facility, the Compliance Officers observed that the exit door from Room 4 was not equipped with a way to alert employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. 3. In an interview, E2 reported that the staff did not monitor the aforementioned door for egress. 4. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E2, and no additional information was provided. Technical assistance was provided regarding this regulation during the compliance inspection conducted on November 14, 2024.
The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection conducted on November 14, 2024:
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident or resident's representative consented to photographs of the resident before the resident was photographed, for two of two residents sampled. Findings include: 1. During an environmental tour of the facility, the Compliance Officers observed cameras used in the facility to monitor residents' whereabouts. 2. A review of R1's and R2's medical records did not contain a photographic consent form signed by the resident or resident's representative. 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged R1's and R2's medical records did not contain consent to photographs by the resident or resident's representative before R1 and R2 were photographed.
Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that policies and procedures were reviewed at least once every three years and updated as needed. The deficient practice posed a risk as policies and procedures reinforce and clarify standards expected of employees. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility's policy and procedure manual revealed documentation of a review of the facility's policies and procedures on January 1, 2018. However, no additional documentation of review was available for Compliance Officer review. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged that the policies and procedures were not reviewed at least once every three years and updated as needed.
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the health care institution administered a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery that included initial training and continued competency training, for one of three personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk for residents. Findings include: 1. A review of E2's personnel record revealed documentation of Fall Prevention and Fall Recovery Training dated September 28, 2021. However, no documentation of further fall prevention and fall recovery training was available for Compliance Officer review. 2. In an interview, E1 reported the facility provided continued competency training regarding fall prevention and fall recovery annually. E1 acknowledged the facility failed to administer a training program for staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery that included continued competency training.
Based on record review and interview, the health care institution's chief administrative officer failed to ensure training and education related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of tuberculosis (TB) was provided annually to individuals employed by the health care institution, for one of three personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents. Findings include: 1. A review of E2's personnel record revealed E2 completed training on recognizing the signs and symptoms of TB on June 10, 2023. However, documentation of additional training was not available for Compliance Officer review. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged E2's personnel record did not include documentation of annual training on recognizing the signs and symptoms of TB.
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Always Caring, LLC
< 1 miAssisted Living · Chandler, AZ
Chandler Senior Assisted Living Home LLC
< 1 miAssisted Living · Chandler, AZ
Five Star Assisted Living
< 1 miAssisted Living · Tempe, AZ
May's Haven, LLC
< 1 miAssisted Living · Chandler, AZ
Big Heart Angels Care Home LLC
< 1 miAssisted Living · Chandler, AZ
Manna Assisted Living Home LLC
< 1 miAssisted Living · Chandler, AZ