Public Google reviewers rate this highly and often mention high-quality dining and professional chefs. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 43 Google reviews

Email Ivy Park of Roseville to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Public Google reviewers rate Ivy Park of Roseville highly. Reviewers highlight: high-quality dining and professional chefs, warm, family-like staff culture. Reviewer identity is not verified, and online reviews may not capture everything. Schedule a visit to assess the fit directly.
Ivy Park of Roseville is widely praised by residents and families for its exceptional dining, warm community atmosphere, and highly attentive staff who treat residents like family. However, while many reviews are glowing, there are serious documented concerns regarding resident safety, specifically involving wandering and medication handling, as well as historical issues with theft.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 47 analyzed
Responds to most reviews with highly personalized, empathetic messages that reference specific details from the reviewer's text. For negative reviews, the owner uses a professional, direct approach by providing contact information to resolve issues privately.
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The food has been delicious and the facility is so clean and feels like home for her. After interviewing 8 different properties in the area for mom, we now know we made the right decision for her.”
“I've recently been through the process of moving my dad into Ivy Park, and I'm very pleased to report that the entire staff there has been and continues to be exceptionally helpful.”
“I just had to file again over a major safety issue. I came to see dad and found him walking the driveway completely lost. He wears an alert that should notify them if he tries to leave the building.”
Source: CA Community Care Licensing Division
This report details a complaint investigation concerning the failure to report a resident fall incident. The allegation was found to be substantiated because staff did not report the incident to the responsible party or the CCL. The facility was cited for failing to meet reporting requirements under CCR 87211(a)(1)(D).
The facility underwent an unannounced annual continuation inspection. The Licensing Program Analyst toured all areas, reviewed resident and staff files, and confirmed adequate supplies and safety measures. No deficiencies were observed during the inspection.
The inspection was conducted by an LPA to review resident and staff files, including medication reviews. The report notes that the LPA will return on a later date to complete the annual inspection. No specific deficiencies were cited in the provided text.
The inspection was a Case Management visit following incident reports regarding medication errors. Two deficiencies were cited, both related to medication administration and incidental medical/dental care planning. Both deficiencies are classified as Type B, indicating potential but not immediate health risks if not corrected.
The facility underwent a Case Management visit following incident reports. The Licensing Program Analyst reviewed resident files and documentation during the visit. No deficiencies were issued as a result of this inspection.
The inspection was a Case Management visit prompted by two incident reports concerning medication errors. The analyst noted the importance of accurate medication management and distribution. Two Type B deficiencies were cited related to medication administration and the overall plan for incidental medical and dental care.
The report details multiple complaint investigations conducted on different dates, with the final deficiency citation appearing on the last page. The only deficiency cited is a Type B violation regarding the provision of care and supervision that meets individual resident needs. Overall, the facility was found to be non-compliant with this specific standard, requiring corrective action.
The annual inspection was conducted on 01/22/2025 and the facility was found to be clean, safe, sanitary, and in good condition. The Licensing Program Analyst observed appropriate staffing, maintained safety equipment, and reviewed resident and staff files without noting any deficiencies.
Well Oak Tenant LLC; Oakmont Mgmt. Group LLC
TORRES, NEAL
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
43 reviews from families & visitors
Official Website
Visit ivyliving.com
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Roseberry Care
1.9 miAssisted Living · Roseville, CA
Sonrisa Senior Living
1.9 miAssisted Living · Roseville, CA
The Ivy at Blue Oaks
2.3 miAssisted Living · Roseville, CA
Oak Ridge Healthcare Center
2.5 miNursing Home · Roseville, CA
Roseville Point Health & Wellness Center
2.6 miNursing Home · Roseville, CA
Brookdale Roseville
2.7 miAssisted Living · Roseville, CA