See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Nursing HomeMedicaid

Haven of Flagstaff

Meets baseline Medicare standards with room for improvement. A tour and talking to current residents' families is the best next step.

800 West University Avenue, Flagstaff, AZ 8600183 bedsLicensed & Active
3/5
Medicare
Inspection
Quality
Staffing
Google rating
4.0/5

based on 150 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1
Haven of Flagstaff Nursing Home in Flagstaff, AZ — Street View
Street View

Watch Haven of Flagstaff

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

While many families report excellent outcomes with the rehabilitation team, there is a recurring pattern of serious neglect concerns, particularly regarding bedsores and responsiveness. If you choose this facility, we strongly advise daily visits to monitor your loved one's condition and ensure their basic needs are being met by the staff.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

150 reviews on Google
Haven of Flagstaff receives highly polarized reviews, with many families praising specific staff members like Vanessa, Eugene, and Sonya for their compassionate, hands-on care. However, a significant number of reviewers report serious concerns regarding neglect, including the development of bedsores, poor communication, and slow response times to call buttons. Families should be aware that while many report successful rehabilitation outcomes, others have experienced distressing lapses in basic safety and hygiene.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food6.0Staff7.0Clean6.0Activities5.0Meds4.0Memory3.0Comms3.0Value7.0

Strengths

  • Dedicated and compassionate nursing assistants (specifically Vanessa, Eugene, and Sonya)
  • Effective physical and occupational therapy programs
  • Clean and well-maintained facility environment
  • Culturally inclusive care for Navajo residents

Concerns

  • Development of bedsores and pressure ulcers (mentioned by 6 reviewers)
  • Slow or non-existent response to call buttons (mentioned by 5 reviewers)
  • Difficulty reaching staff via phone or getting updates (mentioned by 5 reviewers)
  • Poor hygiene and cleanliness in patient rooms (mentioned by 4 reviewers)
  • Patient falls and injuries shortly after admission (mentioned by 3 reviewers)

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

234'14(1)'16(4)'18(5)'20(3)'22(4)'24(69)'26(15)

Distribution · 154 analyzed

5
109
4
8
3
3
2
4
1
30
15 reviews posted between Jan 25, 2024Jan 27, 2024 · 12 were 5-star
11 reviews posted between Mar 10, 2024Mar 16, 2024 · 11 were 5-star

How They Respond to Reviews

100%response rate

This facility actively engages with reviewer feedback.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1I noticed you have a strong reputation for culturally inclusive care; how do you integrate those traditions into the daily activities and social life for your residents?
  • 2Given the importance of skin integrity, what is your specific protocol for monitoring and preventing pressure ulcers for residents who are less mobile?
  • 3I see that you are active in responding to feedback online; what is the best way for families to stay in the loop regarding their loved one's daily status and care updates?
  • 4When a resident presses their call button, what is your facility's standard procedure for ensuring a timely response, especially during shift changes or overnight hours?
  • 5What specific safety measures or assessments are in place during the first few weeks of a new admission to help prevent falls and ensure a smooth transition?
  • 6How does your team coordinate between the nursing staff and the physical therapy department to ensure that the progress made in therapy is maintained throughout the rest of the day?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

My dad James Begay was here at the haven heath in flagstaff and was being cared for by three individuals who worked here they were every excellent, caring and did a great job with my dad! I would love to thank Eugene, Sonya and Vanessa for caring for my dad every day!

Long-term resident's family · 2025★★★★★

I have waited 30 minutes and more for response to the red 'call button', several times. This is the 'emergency' call light, by the way.

Rehab patient · 2018☆☆☆☆

My husband was a patient for two weeks. If I could rate it a negative 10, I would do so. I found them to lie to me and some of his clothes disappeared... He also came home to hospice with bed sores that are just now healed after two months.

Long-term resident's family · 2022☆☆☆☆
Source: 150 Google reviews

Staffing

Staffing Hours

per resident/day · Medicare 2026
RN Hours
0.81hrs
OK
Registered nurses for medical care
Total Nursing
3.51hrs
86%
All nurses + aides combined
Staff Turnover
42%
Lower is better (< 30% = good)
RN Turnover
36%
Lower is better (< 30% = good)

Total nursing hours are below minimum, though RN coverage is adequate. This may mean fewer aides for daily tasks like bathing and mobility.

Quality Measures

Quality Measures

Resident outcomes compared with national, state, and local averages · 17 measures

Medicare Rating
5/ 5
Better Than Avg

13

measures

Worse Than Avg

3

measures

Mixed Results

1

measures

Long-Stay Residents
💊

Residents on antipsychotic medication

↓ Lower is better
This Facility0.0%
Better than Avg
Here
0.0%
US
15.5%
AZ
11.2%
🚿

Residents whose bladder or bowel control got worse

↓ Lower is better
This Facility29.0%
Worse than Avg
Here
29.0%
US
19.4%
AZ
20.5%
💊

Residents on anti-anxiety or sleep medication

↓ Lower is better
This Facility11.2%
Better than Avg
Here
11.2%
US
19.5%
AZ
20.6%
😔

Residents with depression symptoms

↓ Lower is better
This Facility3.2%
Better than Avg
Here
3.2%
US
12.1%
AZ
4.0%

Highly dependent on how each facility screens and codes depressive symptoms, so it varies widely between facilities.

🛏️

Residents needing more daily help over time

↓ Lower is better
This Facility6.7%
Better than Avg
Here
6.7%
US
14.4%
AZ
10.6%
💉

Residents vaccinated for the flu

↑ Higher is better
This Facility100.0%
Better than Avg
Here
100.0%
US
95.5%
AZ
94.6%
Short-Stay Residents (Rehab / Post-Acute)
💉

Short-stay residents vaccinated for the flu

↑ Higher is better
This Facility96.1%
Better than Avg
Here
96.1%
US
79.8%
AZ
87.3%
💉

Short-stay residents vaccinated for pneumonia

↑ Higher is better
This Facility96.5%
Better than Avg
Here
96.5%
US
81.8%
AZ
91.3%
💊

Short-stay residents newly given antipsychotics

↓ Lower is better
This Facility0.0%
Better than Avg
Here
0.0%
US
1.6%
AZ
1.1%
Source: Medicare quality measures

US average from Medicare published data

Inspection History

Medicare Inspection History

3-year lookback · Medicare 2026

7deficiencies
1penalties
Near state avg (7.6)
13 complaint-triggered
$13,098 in fines

Families have filed multiple complaints triggering 13 deficiencies, with recurring concerns about abuse and neglect protection, resident safety, and care planning appearing across multiple surveys from 2022 to 2025. The facility has repeatedly struggled with preventing abuse, properly reporting incidents, and maintaining safety protocols, though all violations show correction dates. Given the pattern of complaint-driven issues and repeated problems in critical areas like resident protection, families should carefully evaluate this facility's ability to provide consistent, safe care.

Dec 22, 2025Complaint
1
0755Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies

Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

Apr 29, 2025Complaint
1
0689Actual harm · IsolatedCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

Mar 14, 2025Routine
4
0363Potential for harm · PatternCorrected

Smoke Deficiencies

Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.

0372Potential for harm · PatternCorrected

Smoke Deficiencies

Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.

0554Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Resident Rights Deficiencies

Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.

0812Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

Mar 14, 2025Complaint
4
0600Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies

Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

0607Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies

Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.

0609Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies

Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

0842Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies

Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

Oct 23, 2024Complaint
3
0600Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies

Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

0609Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies

Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

0686Potential for harm · IsolatedResolved (past non-compliance)

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

Dec 14, 2023Complaint
2
0600Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies

Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

0610Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies

Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

Federal Penalties

Fine

Mar 14, 2025

$13,098

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: AZ State Licensing Agency

12total
30deficiencies
Mar 11, 2025Complaint

The Recertification survey was conducted 03/11/2025 through 03/14/2025 in conjuction with the investigation of complaints# AZ00179508, AZ00180346, AZ00208154, AZ00207082, AZ00206985, AZ00180312, AZ00208673, AZ00186123, AZ00186145, AZ00207505, AZ00206985, AZ00201977, AZ00180221. The following deficiences were cited:

An administrator shall ensure that:R9-10-403.C.2.b.

Violation cited

If abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a resident is alleged or suspected to have occurred before the resident was admitted or while the resident is not on the premises and not receiving services from R9-10-403.E.1.

Violation cited

An administrator shall ensure that:R9-10-410.B.3.a.

Violation cited

An administrator shall ensure that:R9-10-411.A.1.

Violation cited

An administrator shall ensure that policies and procedures for medication services:R9-10-421.A.1.d.

Violation cited

An administrator shall ensure that:R9-10-423.A.3.b.

Violation cited

Mar 10, 2025Other
NFPA 101

Violation cited

NFPA 101

Violation cited

Oct 22, 2024Complaint

An onsite complaint survey was conducted from October 22, 2024 through October 23, 2024 for the investigation of the following intakes: AZ001700567, AZ00176415, AZ00175923, AZ00171734, AZ00171018, AZ00217580 The following deficiencies were cited:

If an administrator has a reasonable basis, according to A.R.S. § 13-3620 or 46-454, to believe that abuse, neglect or exploitation has occurred on the premises or while a resident is receiving servicR9-10-403.F.5.b.Corrected Dec 9, 2024

Based on documentation, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to submit a 5-day written investigation summary regarding physical altercation between 2 residents (#1 and #2). Findings include: -Regarding resident #1 Resident #1 was admitted on December 30, 2020 with diagnosis including displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur, low back pain, unsteadiness on feet, hypertension, unspecified glaucoma, major depressive disorder-recurrent, insomnia, type 2 diabetes with neuropathy, muscle wasting and atrophy, abnormalities of gait and mobility, osteoporosis, repeated falls and urinary tract infection. A review of the admission MDS (minimum data set) dated January 6, 2021 revealed a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 00, indicating severe cognitive impairment. -Regarding resident #2 Resident #2 was admitted on January 2, 2021 with diagnosis including unspecified fracture of right femur, repeated falls, unspecified dementia, type 2 diabetes, monoplegia of upper limb, facial weakness, other cerebral infarction due to occlusion or stenosis. A review of the progress notes revealed an entry, that on January 28, 2021 an altercation took place between resident #1 and #2. It was noted that both residents were sitting in their wheelchairs prior to the altercation. It was further noted that a PTA (physical therapy assistant) was maneuvering resident #2 around the dining table and upon passing resident #1, resident #2 starting hitting resident #1 with her left upper extremity. It was noted that resident #2 kept hitting resident #1 and then resident #1 starting hitting back in self-defense. Staff (PTA) alerted other staff to the incident and the residents were separated. It was noted that the residents were assessed for injuries and none were present. The progress notes further revealed that an LPN staff#22 notified the previous ADON and he called the Arizona State Board of Nursing, leaving a voicemail regarding the incident and that case managers and family members were notified; however, there is no documented evidence that the incident was reported to the state survey agency. Given that the incident occured in 2021, several of the staff members who witnessed the incident are no longer with the facility An interview was conducted on October 22, 2023 at 2:15 P.M. with staff #18 CNA (certified nursing assistant). Staff #18 stated that abuse could be mental, financial, verbal, neglect or physical. She stated that the facility has annual training but also provides monthly training refreshers. Staff # stated that if abuse is observed between residents, the first thing that is done is to physically separate the residents and ensure their safety. Residents may need to be moved to another room, if they were sharing a room. She further stated that once residents are safe, notifications and an incident report would occur and that these are time sensitive and would need to happen right away. A telephonic i

An administrator shall ensure that:R9-10-410.B.3.a.Corrected Dec 9, 2024

Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that two residents (#1 and #2) were free from physical abuse. Findings include: -Regarding resident #1 Resident #1 was admitted on December 30, 2020 with diagnosis including displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur, low back pain, unsteadiness on feet, hypertension, unspecified glaucoma, major depressive disorder-recurrent, insomnia, type 2 diabetes with neuropathy, muscle wasting and atrophy, abnormalities of gait and mobility, osteoporosis, repeated falls and urinary tract infection. A review of the admission MDS (minimum data set) dated January 6, 2021 revealed a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 00, indicating severe cognitive impairment. -Regarding resident #2 Resident #2 was admitted on January 2, 2021 with diagnosis including unspecified fracture of right femur, repeated falls, unspecified dementia, type 2 diabetes, monoplegia of upper limb, facial weakness, other cerebral infarction due to occlusion or stenosis. A review of the progress notes revealed an entry, that on January 28, 2021 an altercation took place between resident #1 and #2. It was noted that both residents were sitting in their wheelchairs prior to the altercation. It was further noted that a PTA (physical therapy assistant) was maneuvering resident #2 around the dining table and upon passing resident #1, resident #2 starting hitting resident #1 with her left upper extremity. It was noted that resident #2 kept hitting resident #1 and then resident #1 starting hitting back in self-defense. Staff (PTA) alerted other staff to the incident and the residents were separated. It was noted that the residents were assessed for injuries and none were present. The progress notes further revealed that an LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse/ staff #22) notified the previous ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) and he called the Arizona State Board of Nursing, leaving a voicemail regarding the incident and that case managers and family members were notified. However, there is no documented evidence that the incident was reported to the state survey agency. An interview was conducted on October 22, 2023 at 2:15 P.M. with CNA (certified nursing assistant/ Staff #18). Staff #18 stated that abuse could be mental, financial, verbal, neglect or physical. She stated that the facility has annual training but also provides monthly training refreshers. Staff #18 stated that if abuse is observed between residents, the first thing that is done is to physically separate the residents and ensure their safety. Residents may need to be moved to another room, if they were sharing a room. She further stated that once residents are safe, notifications and an incident report would occur and that these are time sensitive and would need to happen right away. Stated that she had received training on abuse and behavioral health. A telephonic interview

An administrator shall ensure that a care plan for a resident:R9-10-414.B.3.b.Corrected Mar 1, 2022

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#3) received care for pressure ulcers consistent with professional standards when observed wound care assessments were not completed on a weekly basis. Findings include: Resident #3 was admitted on January 6, 2021 with diagnosis including venous insufficiency (chronic-peripheral), pressure ulcer of the left heel (unstageable), pressure ulcer of the right heel (unstageable), acute posthemorragic anemia and cellulitis of the left lower limb. A review of the discharge MDS (minimum data set) dated March 10, 2021 revealed no BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score. A review of the physician orders revealed orders for daily wound care to both right/ left heels and posterior right/ left calf. Orders were further observed for physical and occupational therapy. An order dated March 10, 2021 was also observed for a consult for heel debridement. A review of the care plan revealed that the resident had a DTI (deep tissue injury) to bilateral heels and had the potential for further pressure ulcer development due to decreased mobility. The noted intervention included to access, record and monitor wound healing weekly and as necessary. It further noted that length, depth and width would be measured when possible and that all assessments would be documented. The care plan further revealed that the resident had limited mobility due to right hand and bilateral lower extremity contractures. The intervention included referral to physical and occupational therapy as well as monitoring and documentation of contractures forming or worsening. The electronic health record for the resident revealed a time span greater than 7-days for pressure ulcer documentation and assessment for the following assessments: January 25, 2021, February 4, 2021 and February 27, 2021. An interview was conducted on October 22, 2024 with staff #115, LPN (licensed practical nurse). Staff #115 stated that that skin assessments are conducted weekly and documented in the electronic health record. She stated that the risk for not completing the assessment or not completing it timely would include not knowing what is going on with the resident in relationship to wound care or the wound worsening. An interview was conducted on October 23, 2024 at 10:30 A.M. with staff #72 (ADON-assistant director of nursing and wound care nurse). Staff #72 stated that upon admission, residents with wounds are placed on weekly wound care rounds with the physician or nurse practitioner. She stated that assessments are conducted weekly but sometimes more often contingent on what is going on with the pressure ulcer. Staff #72 stated that the risk for not having assessments completed weekly would be contingent on the resident's comorbidities. She stated the facility now has a program in place called PUP (pressure ulcer prevention) and that this has been very helpful in reducing the number of facility acquired pressure

Sep 27, 2024Complaint
CleanReport

The complaint survey was conducted on September 27, 2024, with the investigation of intake #: AZ00212475 and AZ00216097. There were no deficiencies cited:

Aug 19, 2024Complaint
CleanReport

A complaint survey was conducted on August 19, 2024 for the investigation of intake #AZ00214721.There were no deficiencies cited.

Aug 18, 2024Complaint
CleanReport

A complaint survey was conducted on August 18, 2024 through August 19, 2024 for the investigation of intake # AZ00214137. There were no deficiencies cited.

Jul 1, 2024Complaint
CleanReport

An onsite complaint survey was conducted on July 1, 2024 for the investigation of intake #s AZ00212063, AZ00204814, AZ00204809. There were no deficiencies cited.

Dec 14, 2023Complaint

A complaint survey was conducted on December 14, 2023 for the investigation of intake #s: AZ00203761, AZ00189896, and AZ00189616. The following deficiencies were cited:

If an administrator has a reasonable basis, according to A.R.S. § 13-3620 or 46-454, to believe that abuse, neglect or exploitation has occurred on the premises or while a resident is receiving servicR9-10-403.F.5.a.Corrected Jan 3, 2024

Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to provide evidence that the an allegation of abuse for one resident (#71) was thoroughly investigated and results of the investigation was reported to the State Agency within 5 working days of the incident. Findings include: Resident #71 was admitted on December 16, 2022 with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, dementia, and generalized muscle weakness. The minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated February 5, 2023 include a brief mental status (BIMS)score of 13 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The progress note dated December 27, 2022 at 11:30 p.m. revealed that the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified about an altercation between two residents. Per the documentation, resident #71 was slapped by another resident (#46); and that, skin assessment revealed no visible or apparent injury noted. The documentation also included that the nurse instructed staff to maintain one-to-one staffing with the other resident (#46) to ensure the safety of the other residents. -Resident #46 was admitted on December 27, 2022 with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, Type II Diabetes, and hypothyroidism. The MDS assessment dated December 28, 2022 revealed a BIMS score of 11 indicating the resident had a moderate cognitive impairment. A progress note dated December 27, 2022 at 5:32 p.m. revealed that resident #46 was heard telling someone on the phone that the resident would blow her own fucking head off. Another progress note dated December 27, 2022 at 5:52 p.m. revealed the resident's change of condition was reported to the nurse practitioner and the certified nursing assistants were asked to check on the resident frequently that night. A progress note dated December 27, 2022 at 6:26 p.m. revealed that resident #46 was wandering, hitting others, and was verbally aggressive. A progress note dated December 27, 2022 at 10:03 p.m. revealed that resident #46 got agitated, crawled out of bed into the hallway screaming for help. Per the documentation, resident #46 got close slapped, and tried to grab resident #7; and that, a certified nursing assistant (CNA) intervened. The documentation also included that resident #46 then aggressively grabbed the CNA and tried to bite the nurse. It also included that the behavior was reported to the physician who advised staff to continue monitoring resident #46 and to keep resident #46 away from other residents. A progress note dated December 27, 2022 at 11:40 p.m. revealed that resident #46 swatted resident #71 and it made a slapping sound. A progress note dated December 28, 2022 at 10:58 a.m. revealed that resident #46 was combative with and threatened to kill her roommate. Per the documentation, when the nurse asked resident #46 to refrain from threatening the roommate, resident #46 threw a glass of water on the nurse. Despite documentation of resident #46 slapping or swatting resident #71, there was no evi

12 Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation483.12(a)(1)Corrected Jan 3, 2024

Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#71) was free from abuse of another. The deficient practice could result on resident being physically and psychosocially harmed by other residents. Findings include: Resident #71 was admitted on December 16, 2022 with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, dementia, and generalized muscle weakness. The minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated February 5, 2023 include a brief mental status (BIMS)score of 13 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The progress note dated December 27, 2022 at 11:30 p.m. revealed that the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified about an altercation between two residents. Per the documentation, resident #71 was slapped by another resident (#46); and that, skin assessment revealed no visible or apparent injury noted. The documentation also included that the nurse instructed staff to maintain one-to-one staffing with the other resident (#46) to ensure the safety of the other residents. -Resident #46 was admitted on December 27, 2022 with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, Type II Diabetes, and hypothyroidism. The MDS assessment dated December 28, 2022 revealed a BIMS score of 11 indicating the resident had a moderate cognitive impairment. A progress note dated December 27, 2022 at 5:32 p.m. revealed that resident #46 was heard telling someone on the phone that the resident would blow her own fucking head off. Another progress note dated December 27, 2022 at 5:52 p.m. revealed the resident's change of condition was reported to the nurse practitioner and the certified nursing assistants were asked to check on the resident frequently that night. A progress note dated December 27, 2022 at 6:26 p.m. revealed that resident #46 was wandering, hitting others, and was verbally aggressive. A progress note dated December 27, 2022 at 10:03 p.m. revealed that resident #46 got agitated, crawled out of bed into the hallway screaming for help. Per the documentation, resident #46 got close slapped, and tried to grab resident #7; and that, a certified nursing assistant (CNA) intervened. The documentation also included that resident #46 then aggressively grabbed the CNA and tried to bite the nurse. It also included that the behavior was reported to the physician who advised staff to continue monitoring resident #46 and to keep resident #46 away from other residents. A progress note dated December 27, 2022 at 11:40 p.m. revealed that resident #46 swatted resident #71 and it made a slapping sound. A progress note dated December 28, 2022 at 10:58 a.m. revealed that resident #46 was combative with and threatened to kill her roommate. Per the documentation, when the nurse asked resident #46 to refrain from threatening the roommate, resident #46 threw a glass of water on the nurse. In an interview conducted with a certified nursing assistant (CNA/staff #3) on December 14, 2023 at 2:21 p.m., the CNA stated

12(c) In response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the facility must:483.12(c)(2)-(4)Corrected Jan 3, 2024

Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to provide evidence that the an allegation of abuse for one resident (#71) was thoroughly investigated and results of the investigation was reported to the State Agency within 5 working days of the incident. The deficient practice could result on further abuse of residents and appropriate actions not taken. Findings include: Resident #71 was admitted on December 16, 2022 with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, dementia, and generalized muscle weakness. The minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated February 5, 2023 include a brief mental status (BIMS)score of 13 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The progress note dated December 27, 2022 at 11:30 p.m. revealed that the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified about an altercation between two residents. Per the documentation, resident #71 was slapped by another resident (#46); and that, skin assessment revealed no visible or apparent injury noted. The documentation also included that the nurse instructed staff to maintain one-to-one staffing with the other resident (#46) to ensure the safety of the other residents. -Resident #46 was admitted on December 27, 2022 with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, Type II Diabetes, and hypothyroidism. The MDS assessment dated December 28, 2022 revealed a BIMS score of 11 indicating the resident had a moderate cognitive impairment. A progress note dated December 27, 2022 at 5:32 p.m. revealed that resident #46 was heard telling someone on the phone that the resident would blow her own fucking head off. Another progress note dated December 27, 2022 at 5:52 p.m. revealed the resident's change of condition was reported to the nurse practitioner and the certified nursing assistants were asked to check on the resident frequently that night. A progress note dated December 27, 2022 at 6:26 p.m. revealed that resident #46 was wandering, hitting others, and was verbally aggressive. A progress note dated December 27, 2022 at 10:03 p.m. revealed that resident #46 got agitated, crawled out of bed into the hallway screaming for help. Per the documentation, resident #46 got close slapped, and tried to grab resident #7; and that, a certified nursing assistant (CNA) intervened. The documentation also included that resident #46 then aggressively grabbed the CNA and tried to bite the nurse. It also included that the behavior was reported to the physician who advised staff to continue monitoring resident #46 and to keep resident #46 away from other residents. A progress note dated December 27, 2022 at 11:40 p.m. revealed that resident #46 swatted resident #71 and it made a slapping sound. A progress note dated December 28, 2022 at 10:58 a.m. revealed that resident #46 was combative with and threatened to kill her roommate. Per the documentation, when the nurse asked resident #46 to refrain from threatening the roommate, resident #46 threw a glass of water on

An administrator shall ensure that:R9-10-410.B.3.a.Corrected Jan 3, 2024

Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#71) was free from abuse of another. Findings include: Resident #71 was admitted on December 16, 2022 with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, dementia, and generalized muscle weakness. The minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated February 5, 2023 include a brief mental status (BIMS)score of 13 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The progress note dated December 27, 2022 at 11:30 p.m. revealed that the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified about an altercation between two residents. Per the documentation, resident #71 was slapped by another resident (#46); and that, skin assessment revealed no visible or apparent injury noted. The documentation also included that the nurse instructed staff to maintain one-to-one staffing with the other resident (#46) to ensure the safety of the other residents. -Resident #46 was admitted on December 27, 2022 with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, Type II Diabetes, and hypothyroidism. The MDS assessment dated December 28, 2022 revealed a BIMS score of 11 indicating the resident had a moderate cognitive impairment. A progress note dated December 27, 2022 at 5:32 p.m. revealed that resident #46 was heard telling someone on the phone that the resident would blow her own fucking head off. Another progress note dated December 27, 2022 at 5:52 p.m. revealed the resident's change of condition was reported to the nurse practitioner and the certified nursing assistants were asked to check on the resident frequently that night. A progress note dated December 27, 2022 at 6:26 p.m. revealed that resident #46 was wandering, hitting others, and was verbally aggressive. A progress note dated December 27, 2022 at 10:03 p.m. revealed that resident #46 got agitated, crawled out of bed into the hallway screaming for help. Per the documentation, resident #46 got close slapped, and tried to grab resident #7; and that, a certified nursing assistant (CNA) intervened. The documentation also included that resident #46 then aggressively grabbed the CNA and tried to bite the nurse. It also included that the behavior was reported to the physician who advised staff to continue monitoring resident #46 and to keep resident #46 away from other residents. A progress note dated December 27, 2022 at 11:40 p.m. revealed that resident #46 swatted resident #71 and it made a slapping sound. A progress note dated December 28, 2022 at 10:58 a.m. revealed that resident #46 was combative with and threatened to kill her roommate. Per the documentation, when the nurse asked resident #46 to refrain from threatening the roommate, resident #46 threw a glass of water on the nurse. In an interview conducted with a certified nursing assistant (CNA/staff #3) on December 14, 2023 at 2:21 p.m., the CNA stated that abuse can be verbal, emotional, physical, sexual, and financial. She stated that if a resident slaps anot

Ownership & Operations

Who Operates This Facility

Owner / Operator

Haven of Flagstaff

Organization Type

for profit

Chain Affiliation

Chain Name

Haven Health

Chain Size

20 facilities nationwide

Chain avg rating: 2.7/5 · Rank 10 of 20

Ownership & Management

Owners

Samuelian, Robert

Owner

Samuelian, Spencer

Owner

Samuelian, Stephen

Owner

Seastrand, Jason

Owner

West, Christian

Owner

Key personnel

Haven Arizona Real Estate, LLC5% or Greater Mortgage InterestHaven Flagstaff Real Estate LLC5% or Greater Mortgage InterestHaven Real Estate Partners, LLC5% or Greater Mortgage InterestHealth Group Management LLCManagerTernion Physician Group, PllcManager
Source: Medicare provider data

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call