Harvest Assisted Living, LLC
Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight compassionate and attentive caregivers. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 8 Google reviews
Watch Harvest Assisted Living, LLC
Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.
We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
What this means for your family
This facility is an excellent choice for families seeking a high level of personalized attention and a clean, modern environment. The presence of a Nurse Practitioner on staff and the hands-on involvement of the owners provide significant peace of mind for medical coordination.
Google Reviews
Google Reviews
8 reviews analyzed“Families considering Harvest Assisted Living can expect a clean, modern, and highly personalized environment where owners are actively involved in resident care. Reviewers consistently praise the compassionate staff and the facility's ability to provide a comfortable, home-like atmosphere for rehabilitation and long-term care.”
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
- Compassionate and attentive caregivers
- Clean and modern facility
- Hands-on ownership and management
- Welcoming, home-like atmosphere
- Expertise in coordinating medical care
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution
How They Respond to Reviews
This facility actively engages with reviewer feedback.
Questions for Your Tour
- 1It's wonderful to see how much care you put into responding to everyone's feedback; how involved are the owners in the day-to-day care of the residents?
- 2The facility looks incredibly clean and modern; what specific routines do you have in place to maintain this high standard of cleanliness?
- 3We are looking for a place that feels like home; how do you foster that welcoming, family-like atmosphere among the residents and staff?
- 4Since you have expertise in coordinating medical care, how do you specifically assist residents with managing their doctor appointments and medication changes?
- 5What kind of daily activities or social outings do you organize to keep residents engaged and connected with one another?
- 6In the event of a sudden health change or a medical emergency during the night, what is the immediate protocol for getting help?
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The home is beautiful, clean and very comfortable. My mother absolutely loves her room! The caregivers do their best to accommodate everyone. Trang, the manager is extremely experienced in medical knowledge. Trang is a NP.”
“As a local physician, I’m well aware of the need for good assisted living facilities in the Phoenix area. Harvest is one of the best I’ve seen, and is a clean, safe and reliable housing option.”
“I visit him often and every time I visit, the house smells like home cooking and clean. Maureen and Steve, two care takers, are kind and patient.”
State Inspection History
State Inspections
Source: AZ State Licensing Agency
Feb 4, 2026Complaint
The following deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00158091 conducted on February 4, 2026:
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident had a written service plan completed no later than 14 calendar days after the resident's date of acceptance. Findings include: 1. A review of R3's medical record revealed a blank service plan with only the manager/designee area signed. Based on the resident's date of acceptance, this documentation was required. 2. In an interview, E1 reported that they did complete a service plan for R3, but were not able to find it at the time of the inspection. 3. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1, and no additional information was provided.
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure services provided were documented in the resident's medical record. Findings include: 1. A review of R3's medical record revealed a blank service plan with only the manager's signature. 2. A review of R3's activities of daily living revealed various services, such as: bathing, brush/comb hair, brush teeth, dress, foot care, incontinence, and night checks. Further review revealed no documentation of the services mentioned above for January 26, 2026 being provided. 3. In an interview, E2 reported that services were not done since the patient refused. However, there was no documentation of the resident refusing services. 4. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1, and no additional information was provided.
Mar 3, 2025Routine
The following deficiencies were found during the on-site abbreviated follow-up inspection conducted on March 3, 2025.
Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that poisonous or toxic materials stored by the assisted living facility were maintained in a locked area and were inaccessible to residents. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident. Findings include: 1. During an environmental tour of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed the following toxic materials stored in an unlocked cabinet under the kitchen sink: Kirkland Dishwasher Tabs; Dawn Power Wash; and Palmolive Dish Soap. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the toxic materials stored by the facility were not maintained in a locked area and were not inaccessible to residents.
Based on documentation review, record review and interview, the health care institution’s chief administrative officer failed to ensure training and education related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of tuberculosis (TB) was provided annually to individuals employed to the health care institution, for one of two personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility's personnel schedule revealed E4 was scheduled to work and provide services at the facility March 1, 2025 - present. 2. A review of E4's personnel record did not include documentation of initial training on recognizing the signs and symptoms of TB. 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged E4's personnel record did not contain documentation of training on recognizing the signs and symptoms of TB.
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a caregiver's skills and knowledge were verified and documented before the caregiver provided health services for one of two personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if a personnel member was unable to meet a resident's needs. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility's personnel schedule revealed E4 was scheduled to work and provide services at the facility March 1, 2025 - present. 2. A review of E4's personnel record did not include documentation of the facility's verification of E4's skills and knowledge. 3. In an interview E2 reported E4 had not provided services at the facility as of March 3, 2025. However, R1 reported E4 has provided services to R1 while R1 has been a resident of the facility. 4. In an interview, E1 acknowledged E4's personnel record did not include documentation of the facility's verification of E4's skills and knowledge before E4 provided services at the facility.
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a caregiver received orientation that was specific to the duties to be performed by the caregiver before providing assisted services to a resident, for one of two personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employees were unable to meet residents’ needs Findings include: 1. A review of the facility's personnel schedule revealed E4 was scheduled to work and provide services at the facility March 1, 2025 - present. 2. A review of E4's personnel record did not include documentation of E4's completed orientation. 3. In an interview E2 reported E4 had not provided services at the facility as of March 3, 2025. However, R1 reported E4 has provided services to R1 while R1 has been a resident of the facility. 4. In an interview, E1 acknowledged E4's personnel record did not include documentation of E4's completed orientation before E4 provided services at the facility.
Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure that medication stored by the facility was stored in a separate locked room, closet, cabinet, or self-contained unit used only for medication storage. The deficient practice posed a risk to residents who were unable to self-administer medications. Findings include: 1. During an environmental tour of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed an unlocked closet in the facility's hallway with a box placed on the shelf. 2. In an interview, E3 reported the box contained extra residents' medications. 3. During an environmental tour of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed the facility's medication storage cabinet to be equipped with a magnetic lock. However, at the time of inspection, the cabinets were left unlocked and the facility's personnel were unable to locate the magnet key. 4. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the facility's stored medications were not stored in a separate locked room, closet, cabinet, or self-contained unit used only for medication storage.
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the health care institution failed to ensure the health care institution developed and administered a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery that included initial training and continued competency training for one of two personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk for residents. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility's personnel schedule revealed E4 was scheduled to work and provide services at the facility March 1, 2025 - present. 2. A review of E4’s personnel record did not include documentation of completed initial training on fall prevention and fall recovery. 3. In an interview E2 reported E4 had not provided services at the facility as of March 3, 2025. However, R1 reported that E4 had provided services to R1 while R1 has been a resident of the facility. 4. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the facility failed to administer a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery that included initial and continued competency training.
Dec 26, 2024RoutineCleanReport
No deficiencies were found during the on-site initial inspection conducted on December 26, 2024, and the off-site documentation review completed on January 3, 2025.
Contact
Get in Touch
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
References & Resources
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
8 reviews from families & visitors
Medicare data downloads
Original nursing home datasets
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Nearby Alternatives
Sunset Grand Assisted Living 1 LLC
< 1 miAssisted Living · Queen Creek, AZ
Immaculate Heart of Mary Assisted Living Home
< 1 miAssisted Living · San Tan Valley, AZ
Dayflower Care Home, LLC
2.0 miAssisted Living · Queen Creek, AZ
Athome Senior Care Services LLC
2.1 miAssisted Living · Queen Creek, AZ
Queen Creek Carehomes, LLC
2.3 miAssisted Living · Queen Creek, AZ
Arden Villa LLC
2.7 miAssisted Living · Queen Creek, AZ