Freedom Care at Bella Vista LLC
Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight commitment to resident engagement. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 5 Google reviews
Watch Freedom Care at Bella Vista LLC
Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.
We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
What this means for your family
While the facility emphasizes emotional support and resident engagement, there is a documented concern regarding the gap between initial promises and actual care delivery. Families should verify specific mobility and strength-building protocols in writing to ensure the care plan is strictly followed.
Google Reviews
Google Reviews
5 reviews analyzed“Families may find comfort in the facility's stated mission of providing active engagement and emotional support during decline. However, there is a significant discrepancy between the promises made during the intake process and the actual level of physical care provided, specifically regarding mobility assistance.”
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
- Commitment to resident engagement
- Supportive approach to family vulnerability
Concerns
- Failure to follow through on promised care plans regarding mobility and strength building
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution
How They Respond to Reviews
Questions for Your Tour
- 1We've heard wonderful things about how much you focus on resident engagement; what are some of the favorite daily activities or social events that residents look forward to most?
- 2How do you ensure that personalized care plans, specifically regarding mobility and strength-building exercises, are consistently followed and updated?
- 3Communication is so important to us as a family; what is your process for keeping us regularly updated on our loved one's well-being and any changes in their health?
- 4In the event of a medical emergency during the night, what is the specific protocol for notifying the family and coordinating care?
- 5We really appreciate the supportive approach you take with families during vulnerable times; how do you involve family members in the care planning process?
- 6How do you monitor and train your staff to ensure the high quality of care and attention that residents need every day?
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“From the first day Mr. Daniel arrived, our team consistently encouraged and supported him in staying as active as possible — helping him sit up during the day, engaging him in activities, and mot”
“The home manager, Ben, said all of the right things to us so that we would choose his facility. Unfortunately, once my father was in their care, the things that Ben had promised would occur did not.”
State Inspection History
State Inspections
Source: AZ State Licensing Agency
Feb 4, 2026Routine
The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection conducted on February 4, 2026:
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the governing authority failed to ensure compliance with A.R.S. § 36-411(C)(2) for one of two personnel reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk as required information could not be verified for personnel to determine a person's fitness to work in the assisted living home. Findings include: 1. A.R.S. § 36-411(C)(2) states, "C. Each residential care institution, nursing care institution and home health agency shall make documented, good faith efforts to: 2. Verify the current status of a person's fingerprint clearance card." 2. A review of the Arizona Department of Public Safety Fingerprint Clearance Status website revealed E2 currently had a valid fingerprint clearance card. However, there was no verification of E2’s fingerprint verification within E2's record. 3. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1, and no additional information was provided. This is a repeat deficiency from the compliance and complaint inspection conducted on February 28, 2025.
Based on record review, observation, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's medical record contained a medication order from a medical practitioner for each medication that was administered to the resident, for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as medication administered could not be verified against a medication order. Findings include: 1. A review of R2’s current service plan, dated January 15, 2026, revealed R2 received medication administration. 2. A review of R2’s medical record revealed a medication list dated July 1, 2025. However, the list was not signed by a medical practitioner as required. The list contained the following medications: • “Quetiapine (Seroquel 25 mg oral tablet) daily at bedtime.”; • “Aspirin (Aspirin EC 81 mg oral delayed release tablet) once every day.”; • “Carbidopa-levodopa (25 mg-100 mg oral tablet) twice a day.”; • “Levetiracetam (Keppra 500 mg oral tablet) twice a day.”; • “Levothyroxine (Synthroid 75 mcg (0.075 mg) oral tablet) daily in the morning.”; • “Midodrine (midodrine 2.5 mg oral tablet) three times a day.”; and • “Pravastatin (pravastatin 40 mg oral tablet) once every day.” 3. A review of R2's medical record did not include a medication order for Trazodone 50 mg, 1 tablet PO QHS. 4. A review of R2’s medical record revealed a medication administration record (MAR) dated January 2026 and February 2026. The MAR revealed R2 received the following medications on the following dates: • Pravastatin 40 mg 1 tab PO QD at 8 AM: January 1, 2026, to February 3, 2026; • Trazodone 50 mg 1 tab PO QHS at 8 PM: January 1, 2026, to February 3, 2026; • Quetiapine 50 mg 1 tab PO TID at 8 AM, 12 PM, and 8 PM: January 1, 2026, to February 3, 2026; • Aspirin 81 mg 1 tab PO QD at 8 AM: January 1, 2026, to February 3, 2026; • Carbidopa-Levodopa 25 mg-100 mg 2 tab PO BID at 8 AM and 8 PM: January 1, 2026, to February 3, 2026; • Levetiracetam/Keppra 500 mg 1 tab PO BID at 8 AM and 8 PM: January 1, 2026, to February 3, 2026; and • Levothyroxine (Synthroid 75 mcg /0.075) 1 tab QD in the morning at 8 AM: January 1, 2026, to February 3, 2026. 5. The Compliance Officers observed Midodrine 2.5 mg 1 tablet prefilled in R2's medication organizer for administration three times a day. 6. A review of the facility’s policies and procedures revealed a policy titled, “Part I – Doctor Orders, Provisions of Medication, Handling Medication, Assisting Resident in Procuring (obtaining) Medication”, which stated, “4. Every time the Resident’s Service Plan is updated, all Doctor’s Orders for each Resident will be consolidated on a single Doctor’s Order form and faxed or mailed to the doctor's office for review and signature to ensure that the Resident’s medication regimen and method of administration meets the resident’s needs, unless the current medication is listed in the Service Plan and reviewed by a Registered Nurse.” 7. A review of R2’s current service plan, dated January 15,
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that medication administered to a resident was accurately documented in the resident's medical record for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as medication could not be verified as administered against a medication order. Findings include: 1. Review of R1’s current service plan, dated August 14, 2025, revealed R1 received medication administration. 2. A review of R1’s medical record revealed a signed medication order dated January 19, 2025, which included the following: “Hydralazine HCI 25 mg 1 tablet oral 2 times a day as needed for Hypertension. Give 1 tablet by mouth twice daily as needed for SBP>160.” 3. A review of R1’s medical record revealed a Resident Vital Signs Chart dated January 2026 and February 2026. The Chart revealed R2’s systolic blood pressure exceeded 160 on the following dates and times: • January 13, 2026: AM B/P 195/92; • January 14, 2026: AM B/P 193/92; • January 15, 2026: PM B/P 167/84; • January 16, 2026: AM B/P 178/90; PM B/P 170/86; • January 17, 2026: AM B/P 184/96; PM B/P 163/93; • January 19, 2026: AM B/P 166/99; PM B/P 183/116; • January 21, 2026: AM B/P 171/92; • January 22, 2026: AM B/P 183/95; • January 23, 2026: AM B/P 194/134; PM B/P 161/107; • January 24, 2026: AM B/P 193/99; • January 25, 2026: AM B/P 185/100; • January 26, 2026: AM B/P 165/94; • January 27, 2026: AM B/P 170/100; • January 28, 2026: AM B/P 163/103; PM B/P 169/89; • January 29, 2026: AM B/P 181/94; • January 30, 2026: AM B/P 166/97; PM B/P 168/90; • January 31, 2026: AM B/P 173/92; PM B/P 169/90; • February 1, 2026: AM B/P 182/115; PM B/P 163/73; • February 2, 2026: AM B/P 181/97; PM B/P 162/93; • February 3, 2026: AM B/P 168/91; PM B/P 179/103; and • February 4, 2026: AM B/P 174/94; PM B/P 180/97. 4. A review of R1’s medical record revealed a medication administration record (MAR) dated January 2026 and February 2026. The MAR stated “Hydralazine 25mg 1 tab PO BID, hold if Systolic BP higher than 160.” Noticeably, the MAR did not match the medication order to administer when R1's systolic blood pressure was greater than 160. The MAR revealed the medication was not documented as administered on the following dates and times, in accordance with R1’s Vital Signs Chart above: • January 13, 2026: AM; • January 14, 2026: AM; • January 15, 2026: PM; • January 16, 2026: AM & PM; • January 17, 2026: AM & PM; • January 19, 2026: AM & PM; • January 21, 2026: AM; • January 22, 2026: AM; • January 23, 2026: AM & PM; • January 24, 2026: AM; • January 25, 2026: AM; • January 26, 2026: AM; • January 27, 2026: AM; • January 28, 2026: AM & PM; • January 29, 2026: AM; • January 30, 2026: AM & PM; • January 31, 2026: AM & PM; • February 1, 2026: AM & PM; • February 2, 2026: AM & PM; • February 3, 2026: AM & PM; and • February 4, 2026: AM & PM. 5. A review of the facility’s policies and procedures revealed a policy titled, “Part III – Medication
Based on observation, record review, document review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure medication stored by an assisted living facility was stored in a separate locked room, closet, cabinet, or self-contained unit used only for medication storage. The deficient practice posed a risk to residents’ health and safety. Findings include: 1. During an environmental tour, the Compliance Officers observed one unsecured bottle of Guaifenesin LIQ 100/5 ML located on R1’s bedside table in R1’s personal room. 2. During the environmental tour, the Compliance officers observed the following items located inside an unlocked drawer in the kitchen where non-medication items were being stored: one bag of Vapo Cool cough drops; one bag of Halls cough drops; one combination box of DayQuil and Nyquil; one 2-pack of Tylenol Cold & Flu Severe Night caplets; and one blister pack of Chloroacetic lozenges. 3. During the environmental tour, the Compliance Officers observed one box of Polyethylene Glycol 3350 powder located in an unlocked cabinet in the kitchen where non-medications were stored. 4. During the environmental tour, the Compliance Officers observed that the medication storage cabinet located in the kitchen was unsecured. The cabinet contained medications for all the residents in the facility. Further inspection of the cabinet revealed the lock was not functioning at the time of inspection. 5. A review of R1’s current service plan, dated August 14, 2025, revealed R1 received medication administration. 6. A review of the facility’s policies and procedures revealed a policy titled, “Part II – Receiving, Storing Medication” which stated, “3. Medication stored by the facility must be secured in a locked storage area, closet, cabinet, or self-contained unit used for medication storage only.” 7. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1, and no additional information was provided. This is a repeat deficiency from the compliance and complaint inspection conducted on February 28, 2025.
Jul 30, 2024RoutineCleanReport
No deficiencies were found during the on-site abbreviated initial follow-up inspection conducted on July 30, 2024.
Apr 3, 2024ComplaintCleanReport
This Statement of Deficiencies (SOD) supersedes the SOD sent on April 5, 2024. An on-site initial inspection and investigation of complaint AZ00208557 was conducted on April 3, 2024. The allegation that a person shall not establish, conduct, or maintain in this state a health care institution or any class or subclass of health care institution unless that person holds a current and valid license issued by the department specifying the class or subclass of health care institution the person is establishing, conducting, or maintaining, per A.R.S.\'a7 36-407(A) was unable to be substantiated and no deficiency was cited.
Contact
Get in Touch
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
References & Resources
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
5 reviews from families & visitors
Medicare data downloads
Original nursing home datasets
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Nearby Alternatives
Sunshine Residential Care Home
2.0 miAssisted Living · Surprise, AZ
Memory Lane Retreat, LLC
3.2 miAssisted Living · Surprise, AZ
Aria Ranch Senior Living
3.3 miAssisted Living · Surprise, AZ
Arizona Care L.L.C.
4.1 miAssisted Living · Surprise, AZ
Elder Joy, LLC
4.3 miAssisted Living · Surprise, AZ
Sante of Surprise
4.4 miNursing Home · Surprise, AZ