Public Google reviewers rate this highly and often mention compassionate and attentive nursing staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 53 Google reviews
Email Countryside Senior Living to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Public Google reviewers rate Countryside Senior Living highly. Reviewers highlight: compassionate and attentive nursing staff, beautiful, clean, and inviting facility. Reviewer identity is not verified, and online reviews may not capture everything. Schedule a visit to assess the fit directly.
Countryside Senior Living is highly regarded for its compassionate, family-oriented staff and beautiful, clean environment that provides a 'home-like' feel. While the vast majority of families praise the exceptional memory care and engaging activities, one recent reviewer raised serious concerns regarding documentation and staff turnover.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 30 analyzed
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“Our 94, 96 yr old parents have loved living here for over a year now. Everything - from the delicious food, loving caregivers, fun activities, an in-house beautician - is so welcoming and family friendly.”
Source: AZ State Licensing Agency
An on-site investigation of complaint AZ00213985 was conducted on August 13, 2024, and the following deficiencies were cited :
Based on record review, documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure service plans for residents included documentation of the resident's weight or documentation from a medical practitioner stating weighing the resident was contraindicated, for one of two residents receiving directed care services. Findings include: 1. A review of R3's personnel record revealed a service plan. However, the service plan did not include documentation of the resident's weight. 2. A review of facility documentation revealed a document titled "Monthly Weight Report." The document revealed weights taken for all residents during the months of June and July 2024. 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged R3's service plan had not included documentation of the resident's weight.
Based on documentation review and interview, the assisted living center failed to provide the required documentation to an emergency responder when an emergency responder had been contacted. Findings include: 1. A review of facility documentation revealed a "Transfer/Move Out Report" dated July 16, 2024. The documentation included all information required except the reason the emergency responder was requested on behalf of the resident. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged documentation to an emergency responder when an emergency responder had been contacted had not included the reason the emergency responder was requested on behalf of the resident.
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident had a written service plan signed and dated by the resident or resident's representative, for one of three residents sampled. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a service plan dated August 1, 2023 (sic). The service plan revealed signatures of the resident and manager. However, the date the resident signed the service plan was not available on the service plan. 2. In an interview, E1 reported the service plan was actually for June 14, 2024. E1 reported instead of filling out a new service plan, E1 made a copy of R1's previous service plan and added the note under additional instructions. 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged R1's service plan had not been dated when signed by the resident.
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's service plan included the amount, type, and frequency of assisted living services being provided to the resident, including medication administration or assistance in the self-administration of medication, for one of three residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if a resident's service plan did not include the services to be provided. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a service plan dated August 1, 2023 (sic). The service plan stated "Independent" on the first page for medication services. However, on the third page of the service plan, under additional instructions, it states "as of 6/14 resident will receive assistance with med management. Medications are stored." 2. In an interview, E1 reported the service plan was actually for June 14, 2024. E1 reported instead of filling out a new service plan, E1 made a copy of R1's previous service plan and added the note under additional instructions. 3. Further review of R1's service plan revealed signatures of the resident and manager. However, the date the resident signed the service plan was not available on the service plan. 4. In an interview, E1 acknowledged R1's service plan had not included clear indication of medication services being provided to R1.
An on-site investigation of complaints AZ00207052 and AZ00210941 was conducted on June 11, 2024, and the following deficiencies were cited:
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the assisted living facility failed to provide the required documentation to an emergency responder, for one of one sampled resident for whom an emergency responder had been contacted. Findings include: 1. A review of facility documentation revealed an incident report dated May 6, 2024 for an unwitnessed fall. The documentation stated 911 was called. The incident report indicated R2 had been transported to the hospital after being found on the floor. 2. In an interview, E1 was asked for documentation of the required documentation given to the responders. E1 reported it was not done.
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure when a resident had an accident, emergency, or injury resulting in the resident needing medical services, a caregiver or assistant caregiver documented the action taken to prevent the accident, emergency, or injury from occurring in the future which posted a health and safety risk. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility's documentation revealed a report dated May 6, 2024 regarding R2's fall. The report stated R2 had an unwitnessed fall. However, the documentation of any action taken to prevent the accident, emergency, or injury from occurring in the future was not available for review. Documentation stated that 911 was called. 2. Review of R2's medical record revealed that R2 required directed care and medication administration services and was ambulatory. 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the facility failed to document action taken to prevent the injury from reoccurring in the future
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Circles of Life Residential Care and Memory Care L
< 1 miAssisted Living · Queen Creek, AZ
Arden Villa LLC
< 1 miAssisted Living · Queen Creek, AZ
Athome Senior Care Services LLC
< 1 miAssisted Living · Queen Creek, AZ
Comforts of Home Alh, LLC
< 1 miAssisted Living · Queen Creek, AZ
Elder Grace Assisted Living LLC
< 1 miAssisted Living · Queen Creek, AZ
Sunshine Assisted Living LLC
1.1 miAssisted Living · Queen Creek, AZ