Public Google reviewers rate this highly and often mention compassionate and invested staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 33 Google reviews
Email Caroline Baylon to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Public Google reviewers rate Caroline Baylon highly. Reviewers highlight: compassionate and invested staff, excellent family communication and updates. Reviewer identity is not verified, and online reviews may not capture everything. Schedule a visit to assess the fit directly.
Families considering this facility can expect highly compassionate, family-oriented care, with many reviewers praising the staff's ability to support both the resident and the entire family unit. While the majority of experiences are overwhelmingly positive regarding therapeutic progress and communication, one reviewer reported a traumatic discharge process and loss of personal belongings.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 30 analyzed
This facility actively engages with reviewer feedback.
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The staff at Horizon are more than just professionals; they're a compassionate family that goes above and beyond to support not only the teen in recovery but the entire family unit.”
“I can text or call anyone on my daughters care team nearly 24/7 and get an immediate response. You just can't ask for more than that.”
“The therapists my daughter worked with (Dawn and Grace) are top-notch and were really able to get through to her.”
Source: AZ State Licensing Agency
The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection conducted on August 15, 2023:
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a residency agreement included the policy and procedure for a resident to terminate residency. Findings include: 1. Review of R2's record revealed a residency agreement. The residency agreement stated; "Termination: The management will provide the resident or resident's representative 30 days written notice before terminating the residency agreement except in the following circumstances: a. The management will terminate the residency agreement without notice if the resident exhibits behavior that is an immediate threat to the health and safety of the resident or other individuals in the assisted living facility; the resident's medical or health needs require immediate transfer to another health care institution; the resident's care and service needs exceed the services the facility is licensed to provide; The management will terminate the residency agreement after providing 14 days written notice to a resident or the resident's representative for any of the following reasons; documented failure to pay fee's or changes; documented non-compliance with the residency agreement or internal facility requirements." 2. During an interview, E1 acknowledged R2's residency agreement did not include the correct policy and procedure for a resident to terminate residency.
Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure the means of exiting the facility for a resident who does not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort, controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unaware of the general or specific whereabouts of a resident. Findings include: 1. Review of the license issued by the Department revealed the facility was authorized to provide directed care services. 2. During the facility tour with E1, the compliance officers observed a patio door that led to an outside area, in the backyard, allowed residents to be a least 30 feet away from the facility. The door leading out to the backyard did not have a means of controlling or alerting employees of the egress of residents to the outside area. 3. During an interview, E1 reported E1 was unaware of the identified rule. E1 acknowledged the patio door exiting to the outside area did not have a means of controlling or alerting employees to egress. E1 reported E1 used a wooden rod to place in the door to stop the door from opening. E1 acknowledged this wooden rod could be removed by the compliance officer and a resident. E1 acknowledged the manager failed to ensure the means of exiting the facility for a resident who does not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort, controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility.
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
West Valley Helping Hands
< 1 miAssisted Living · Peoria, AZ
Lumio Care Home LLC
< 1 miAssisted Living · Peoria, AZ
Forever My Heart LLC
< 1 miAssisted Living · Sun City, AZ
Arrowhead Shore Senior Living, LLC
< 1 miAssisted Living · Peoria, AZ
Hidden Valley Assisted Living
< 1 miAssisted Living · Sun City, AZ
Meadow Assisted Living Care
< 1 miAssisted Living · Sun City, AZ