Brookdale Central Chandler
Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight compassionate administrative and office staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 45 Google reviews
Watch Brookdale Central Chandler
Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.
We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
What this means for your family
This facility offers excellent administrative support and a welcoming environment for new residents. However, families should closely monitor the quality of food and personally observe the conduct of floor-level caregivers, as recent reports indicate a decline in staff professionalism and nutritional standards.
Google Reviews
Google Reviews
45 reviews analyzed“Families often praise the facility for its compassionate administrative staff and the seamless transition process for new residents. However, recent reviews highlight significant concerns regarding inconsistent food quality and specific instances of unprofessional behavior by certain caregivers.”
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
- Compassionate administrative and office staff
- Smooth transition and move-in process
- Engaging activities and social atmosphere
- Clean and well-maintained environment
Concerns
- Unprofessional behavior by specific med techs/caregivers (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
- Inconsistent food quality and nutrition (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
- Difficulty reaching staff via phone
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution
How They Respond to Reviews
This facility responds to some reviews.
Questions for Your Tour
- 1It's great to see how clean and well-maintained the facility is; how do you ensure this high standard of cleanliness is maintained across all resident rooms?
- 2We've heard wonderful things about how compassionate your administrative team is; how does that team support families during the initial move-in process?
- 3Could you tell us more about the daily activity calendar and how you ensure residents stay socially engaged with one another?
- 4What specific steps are in place to ensure consistent nutrition and high-quality meal service for all residents during every mealtime?
- 5How do you manage communication between the caregiving staff and family members, especially if we have questions outside of regular office hours?
- 6In the event of a medical emergency or a change in a resident's health status during the night, what is the protocol for notifying the family and providing care?
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The staff in the office, med techs, care givers, nurses, dining staff and managers always did a great job caring for my Mom. They are all extremely caring, helpful and always do their best to deliver high quality care for everyone in the facility.”
“Lisa at Brookdale Central Chandler location has been phenomenal from start to finish with my mother she welcomed us with open arms right from beginning would recommend this place to anyone.”
“The staff that really stands out is Erica. I observed her engaging with clients and the activities she does with them is very appropriate. She makes sure all clients that do the activities participate.”
State Inspection History
State Inspections
Source: AZ State Licensing Agency
Mar 9, 2026Complaint
This Statement of Deficiencies (SOD) supersedes the SOD sent on March 25, 2026. The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection and investigation of complaints 00161399 and 00161136, conducted on March 9, 2026:
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that the health, safety, or welfare of a resident was not placed at risk of harm. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a progress note dated February 17, 2026, that stated, "The fall occurred in the shower...[E4] witnessed the resident fall...[R1] slid from the shower chair...Resident is not able to move all extremities compared to normal (pre-fall) baseline. The resident's left knee was swollen...The resident was taken to the hospital for evaluation." 2. A review of R1's medical record revealed a service plan dated February 16, 2026, that indicated R1 was a two-person transfer assist. 3. In an interview, E1 reported that E4 was unaware that R1 was a two-person assist before attempting to transfer R1 out of the shower by themselves. As a result, R1 slipped on the way out of the shower and fell. 4. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided.
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver's skills and knowledge were verified and documented before the caregiver provided physical health services for two of four employees sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employees were unable to meet a resident's needs. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility's policies and procedures revealed a policy titled “Skills & Competency Policy” The policy stated, “Upon hire and as needed, the skills sets or competencies will be assessed/evaluated through a variety of methods, including but not limited to: Proof of certifications, proof of licensure, attendance of required state specific trainings with passing of examinations (if required), demonstration and documentation of required competencies prior to providing resident care. The assessment/evaluation may include skills, tasks, or competencies identified in the associate's job description (e.g. bathing, handwashing, ambulation, transfer, etc.)” 2. A review of E3’s personnel record revealed E3 was hired as a caregiver on February 4, 2026. Evidence of documentation indicating E3’s skills and knowledge were verified was unavailable for review. 3. A review of E4’s personnel record revealed E4 was hired as a caregiver on September 27, 2018. Evidence of documentation indicating E4’s skills and knowledge were verified was unavailable for review. 4. A review of facility staff documentation revealed E3 and E4 worked numerous shifts in February 2026. 5. In an interview, the findings were reviewed with E1, and no additional information was provided.
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) within seven calendar days after the resident's date of occupancy, as stated in R9-10-113 for three of seven residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a TB exposure risk to residents. Findings include: 1. R9-10-113.A states "If a health care institution is subject to the requirements of this Section, as specified in an Article in this Chapter, the health care institution's chief administrative officer shall ensure that the health care institution establishes, documents, and implements tuberculosis infection control activities that...2. Include: a. For each individual who is employed by the health care institution, provides volunteer services for the health care institution, or is admitted to the health care institution and who is subject to the requirements of this Section, screening, on or before the date specified in the applicable Article of this Chapter, that consists of: i. Assessing risks of prior exposure to infectious tuberculosis, ii. Determining if the individual has signs or symptoms of tuberculosis, and iii. Obtaining documentation of the individual's freedom from infectious tuberculosis according to subsection (B)(1)..." 2. A review of R4, R6, and R7's medical records revealed no documentation of assessing risks of prior exposure to infectious TB and a determination of whether R4, R6, and R7 had signs or symptoms of TB. Based on R4, R6, and R7's date of acceptance, this documentation was required. 3. A record review of R6 and R7's medical records revealed no documentation of R6 and R7's freedom from infectious TB. Based on R6 and R7's date of acceptance, this documentation was required. 4. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided.
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident had a service plan that was completed no later than 14 calendar days after the resident’s date of acceptance. for one out of seven residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as there was no service plan to direct services to be provided to a resident. Findings include: 1. A review of R7's medical record revealed there was no service plan available. Based on R7's date of acceptance, this documentation was required. 2. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided.
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the facility did not accept or retain a resident who was confined to a bed or chair because of an inability to ambulate even with assistance, unless the facility obtained a written determination from a medical practitioner, every six months, that stated the resident's needs could be met by the facility and the resident's needs were within the facility's scope of services, for one residents reviewed who was confined to a bed or chair. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed documentation from a doctor that indicated R1 was unable to ambulate even with assistance and was confined to a bed or chair. The document was signed by a doctor and dated in 2024. 2. Review of R1's medical record revealed no documentation indicating R1's medical practitioner had examined R1 at least once every six months, signed and dated a determination that stated R1's needs could be met by the facility, and reviewed the facility's scope of services after 2024. 3. In an interview, E1 reported that R1 was confined to a bed or chair and could not ambulate with assistance. 4. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided.
Based on observation, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that if pets or animals were allowed in the assisted living facility, pets or animals were licensed consistent with local ordinances. Findings include: 1. In an interview, E1 reported that there were three pets currently living at the facility, which included two dogs and one cat. 2. A review of both dogs' records revealed no documentation of a current license from Maricopa County. 3. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided.
Feb 5, 2026ComplaintCleanReport
An on-site complaint investigation for complaint 00152246, 00157934, and 00157937 was conducted on February 5, 2026. No deficiencies were found.
Dec 2, 2025ComplaintCleanReport
This Statement of Deficiencies (SOD) supersedes the SOD sent on December 9, 2025. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaints 00152044 and 00152059 conducted on December 2, 2025.
Nov 28, 2025Complaint
The following deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00151582 conducted on November 28, 2025:
Based on documentation review, record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure an employee provided documentation of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) as specified in R9-10-113, for one of five caregivers sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents. Findings include: 1. R9-10-113.A states "If a health care institution is subject to the requirements of this Section, as specified in an Article in this Chapter, the health care institution's chief administrative officer shall ensure that the health care institution establishes, documents, and implements tuberculosis infection control activities that...2. Include: a. For each individual who is employed by the health care institution, provides volunteer services for the health care institution, or is admitted to the health care institution and who is subject to the requirements of this Section, screening, on or before the date specified in the applicable Article of this Chapter, that consists of: i. Assessing risks of prior exposure to infectious tuberculosis, ii. Determining if the individual has signs or symptoms of tuberculosis, and iii. Obtaining documentation of the individual's freedom from infectious tuberculosis according to subsection (B)(1)..." 2. A review of E5's personnel record revealed a hire date of February 19, 2025. The record included a positive test result for infectious TB dated after E5's date of hire. Documentation of freedom from infectious TB was not available. 3. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided. 4. This is a repeat deficiency from the inspection conducted on February 4, 2025.
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver provided current documentation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training that included a demonstration of the individual's ability to perform CPR, before providing assisted living services, for one of five employees sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if an employee was unable to meet a resident's needs during an emergency. Findings include: 1. A review of E2's personnel record revealed a documentation of CPR training dated April 11, 2025, however, this training was conducted by the National CPR Foundation, which was a CPR and first aid training program available exclusively online. Documentation was not available showing a demonstration of the individual's ability to perform CPR 2. A review of the facility’s documentation/policies and procedures revealed a document titled "CPR Policy-States Requiring Certification" with the following verbiage, "Nurses, caregivers, managers or volunteers who provide direct care to residents will be required to complete CPR and first aid training as required by Arizona regulations. This training will be provided by an approved trainer through American Red Cross, American Heart Association, or National Safety Council." 3. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided.
Oct 6, 2025ComplaintCleanReport
No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaints 00146658, 00146672, and 00143076 conducted on October 6, 2025.
Oct 6, 2025OtherCleanReport
On October 6, 2025, an off-site desktop review to change the licensed capacity from 112 directed care to 34 directed care and 78 personal care was completed.
Jul 2, 2025ComplaintCleanReport
No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaints 00134350 and 00132920 conducted on July 2, 2025.
May 15, 2025ComplaintCleanReport
No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00128903 conducted on May 15, 2025.
Contact
Get in Touch
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
References & Resources
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
45 reviews from families & visitors
Medicare data downloads
Original nursing home datasets
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Nearby Alternatives
D'arcy Manor Assisted Living Home, LLC
1.3 miAssisted Living · Chandler, AZ
Cam Assisted Living Home LLC
1.5 miAssisted Living · Chandler, AZ
Desert Rose Assisted Living LLC
2.6 miAssisted Living · Chandler, AZ
Villa Jean I LLC
2.8 miAssisted Living · Chandler, AZ
Liberty Care Home II
4.2 miAssisted Living · Gilbert, AZ
Abuelitos Home, LLC
4.2 miAssisted Living · Chandler, AZ