See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Assisted LivingMedicaid

Assisted Living on Broadway

Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight intimate, home-like environment. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.

7120 S Broadway, Littleton, CO 8012212 bedsLicensed & Active
Source: CO CDPHE — view official record
Google rating
4.7/5

based on 20 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1
Assisted Living on Broadway Assisted Living in Littleton, CO — Street View
Street View

Watch Assisted Living on Broadway

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

This facility is highly regarded for its intimate, family-like atmosphere and excellent food, making it a strong candidate for those seeking personalized memory care. However, families should carefully review all financial agreements and billing policies upfront, as there have been reports of disputes regarding refunds and Medicaid billing transparency.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

20 reviews on Google
Assisted Living on Broadway is a small, family-owned facility that receives high praise for its intimate, home-like environment and compassionate, attentive staff. Families frequently highlight the personalized care, clean surroundings, and high-quality, homemade meals as key benefits for their loved ones. While the vast majority of feedback is glowing, one critical review raises concerns regarding administrative billing disputes and the facility's ability to manage specific behavioral needs.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food10.0Staff9.0Clean9.0Activities8.0MedsN/AMemory9.0Comms7.0Value9.0

Strengths

  • Intimate, home-like environment
  • Compassionate and attentive staff
  • High-quality, homemade meals
  • Personalized, individualized care

Concerns

  • Administrative and billing disputes (mentioned by 2 reviewers)

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

2345.0'15(3)5.05.0'18(2)5.05.0'20(4)4.05.0'25(2)5.0'26(1)

Distribution · 22 analyzed

5
20
4
0
3
0
2
1
1
1

How They Respond to Reviews

35%response rate

This facility responds to some reviews.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1Given the intimate size of the home with only 12 residents, how do you foster a sense of community and keep residents engaged in daily activities?
  • 2We noticed the meals are highly praised for being homemade; could you tell us more about how you accommodate individual dietary preferences or special requests?
  • 3Could you walk us through your process for billing and administrative communication to ensure everything remains transparent and easy for families to manage?
  • 4With your focus on personalized, individualized care, how do you ensure that staff members are consistently updated on a resident's changing health needs?
  • 5In the event of a medical emergency, what is your protocol for coordinating care and keeping family members informed?
  • 6We appreciate that you take the time to respond to feedback online; how do you use that family input to continuously improve the experience for your residents?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

My mom has flourished in this smaller, more intimate environment where the caregivers and staff treat her like family.

Long-term resident's family · 2020★★★★★

The facility was immaculately clean, and my mom looked nice every day. The smell from the kitchen always made the facility feel like home.

Long-term resident's family · 2024★★★★★

The memory care did not feel like an institution or a facility, rather it was a family.

Professional visitor · 2020★★★★★
Source: 20 Google reviews

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: CO Dept. of Public Health & Environment

10total
6deficiencies
Jan 20, 2026Other
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Jan 20, 2026Other
N/A0000 & 9999

A relicensure survey was completed on 1/20/26. No deficiencies were cited THIS PORTION OF THE REPORT IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. No response is necessary. The residence was advised it must review and maintain the following processes in accordance with existing program regulations found at 6 CCR 1011-1, Chapter 7.(U1180) 12.15 The assisted living residence shall develop policies and procedures to establish a fall management program. The program shall include the following:(A) Providing fall management education and materials to residents and family members;(B) Detailing in each resident ' s care plan the individualized approach necessary to address fall risk related to deficits in strength, balance, and eyesight, or effects of medication as identified during the comprehensive resident assessment.

Mar 4, 2025Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Oct 16, 2024Complaint
N/A0000, 0610, 0640 and 2 more

A licensure complaint, prompted by #CO37921, was completed on 10/16/24. Deficiencies were cited. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the residence failed to ensure that each staff member received initial orientation for four of five sample staff (#7-#10), affecting 11 current residents.Findings include: 1. Record ReviewOn 10/16/24, staff files for Staff #7-#9 contained no evidence that the residence conducted orientation before working with residents. An email correspondence with a contract staffing agency, dated 10/16/24, read in part that Staff #7-#10 worked at the residence on the following dates and times: On 9/30/24, Staff #7 worked from 2:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. On 9/22/24, Staff #8 worked from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m.On 9/24/24, Staff #9 worked from 10:00 p.m. to 6:15 a.m.On 9/27/24 and 9/28/2024, Staff #10 worked from 2:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.On 10/16/24, at approximately .. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to ensure a name-based criminal history check conducted by the Colorado Bureau of Investigation (CBI) was completed for each staff member prior to staff hire for four sample staff (#7-#10), affecting 11 current residents.Findings include:1. Record Review On 10/16/24, staff files for Staff #7-#9 contained no evidence that the residence obtained documentation of a name-based criminal history check conducted by the CBI before working with residents. An email correspondence with a contract staffing agency, dated 10/16/24, read in part that Staff #7-#10 worked at the residence on the following dates and times: On 9/30/24, Staff #7 worked from 2:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. On 9/22/24, Staff #8 worked from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m.On 9/24/24, Staff #9 worked .. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to ensure two individuals who are qualified medication administration persons, nurses, or practitioners jointly counted all controlled substances at the end of each shift and signed documentation regarding the results of the count at the time it occurred, affecting four current residents with controlled medications (#1, #2, #4, #5) Findings include:1. Record ReviewA controlled substance sheet, dated 10/15/24, read Staff #1 signed in and Staff #5 signed out.A review of the staff file for Staff #1 revealed no documentation that Staff #1 was a qualified medication administration personnel (QMAP). 2. InterviewsOn 10/16/24 at 1:01 p.m., the nursing consultant stated that she told the residence that a staff member who was not a QMAP could s.. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to have a readily available updated and current roster, which affected two current residents (#2, #3).Findings include:1. Record Review On 10/16/24 at 7:35 a.m., a roster of current residents for emergency preparedness was requested. On 10/8/24 at 7:36 a.m., the roster that was provided included three former residents (#12-#14) and did not include Residents #2 and #3. 2. InterviewOn 10/16/24 at 7:45 a.m., the interim administrator stated that she was aware the resident roster did not have current resident information prior to the on-site visit and that if there was an emergency, the list was incorrect and could have caused issues for emergency responders.On 10/16/24 at 9:38 a.m., the administrator stated she failed to update the residen..

Oct 16, 2024Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Aug 29, 2024Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Aug 29, 2024Complaint
N/A0000 & 9999

A revisit survey was completed on 8/29/24 for all previous deficiencies cited on 6/3/24. The facility is in compliance with all deficiencies that were cited. Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally

Jun 3, 2024Complaint
N/A0000 & 0630

A certification revisit was completed on 6/3/24 for all previous deficiencies cited on 3/8/23. A deficiency was cited.The regulations governing Alternative Care Facilities were revised and the new regulations were implemented on 3/15/23. Based on interview and record review, the facility (residence) failed to maintain and follow written policies and procedures for the administration of medication in accordance with 6 CCR 1011-1, Chapter VII Medication Administration Regulations, affecting three of three sample participants (residents) (#1-#3).This deficiency was cited previously during a state licensure survey 3/8/23. Although the facility corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the facility has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement.Findings include:1. Chapter VII regulations governing assisted living residences, part 14.11, requires that only medication that has been ordered by an authorized practitioner shall be prepared for or administered to residents.Resident #5 was admitted to the residence on 8/17/22.The May 2024 medication administration record (MAR) read the residence administered K-Y pearls in the evenings of 5/1-5/31/24 for a total of 31 days. However, the residence did not provide a written practitioner' s order for the medication. There was similar deficient practice for Resident #9.On 6/3/24 at 3:23 p.m., the administrator stated she was unable to find the written practitioner' s orders for Resident #5 and Resident #9. She further stated she expected there to have been an order in the residents' records, and she believed that staff had misplaced the orders. The administrator stated she believed this deficiency that was previously cited had been corrected; however, she did not find the written orders. 2. Chapter VII regulations governing assisted living residences, part 14.21, requires the residence to comply with authorized practitioner orders associated with medication administration except for those medications which a resident self-administers.a. Resident #13 was admitted to the residence on 5/20/24 with a diagnosis of dementia.SertralineA written practitioner' s order, dated 5/17/24, directed the residence to administer sertraline 100 mg daily. However, the May 2024 medication administration record (MAR) revealed the residence faile..

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call