Angelica Paul
Limited public data available for this facility. Call to verify details directly.
Watch Angelica Paul
Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.
We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Nearby Alternatives To Compare
Compare this facility with at least one nearby backup option.
When public data is thin, nearby alternatives give you better context on pricing, reviews, and how much information is publicly available in the same market.
Marie's Board and Care II
2.5 miAssisted Living · Phoenix, AZ
Sonoran Sky Assisted Living Care Home
3.2 miAssisted Living · Phoenix, AZ
Christian Care Nursing Center
4.3 miNursing Home · Phoenix, AZ
Christian Care Nursing Center
4.3 miNursing Home · Phoenix, AZ
Active Care Homes, LLC
4.5 miAssisted Living · Scottsdale, AZ
North Mountain Medical and Rehabilitation Center
4.6 miNursing Home · Phoenix, AZ
State Inspection History
State Inspections
Source: AZ State Licensing Agency
Feb 4, 2025Routine
The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection conducted on February 4, 2025:
Based on documentation review and interview, the health care institution failed to establish, document, and implement tuberculosis (TB) infection control activities including annually assessing the health care institution's risk of exposure to infectious TB. The deficient practice posed a TB exposure risk to residents and staff. Findings include: 1. Review of facility documentation revealed no documentation of annually assessing the health care institution's risk of exposure to infectious TB was available. 2. In an interview, E1 reported E1 was not aware of the annual requirement. E1 acknowledged an assessment of the health care institution's risk of exposure to infectious TB was not conducted annually.
Based on documentation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a standardized form for each resident that included the information prescribed in A.R.S. 36-420.04.A for two of two residents sampled. The deficient practiced posed a risk as required patient information was not prepared in case of an emergency. Findings include: 1. A.R.S. 36-420.04.A states, "A. An assisted living center or assisted living home that contacts an emergency responder on behalf of a resident shall provide to the emergency responder a written document that includes all of the following: 1. The reason or reasons the emergency responder was requested on behalf of the resident. 2. Whether the resident receives medication services and, if the resident has provided this information to the assisted living center or assisted living home, a list of all the resident's prescription and over-the-counter medications, their dosages and how frequently they are administered. 3. The name, address and telephone number of the resident's current pharmacy. 4. A list of any known allergies to any medications, additives, preservatives or materials like latex or adhesive. 5. The name and contact information for the resident's primary care physician and power of attorney or authorized representative. 6. Basic information about the resident's physical and mental conditions and basic medical history, such as having diabetes or a pacemaker or experiencing frequent falls or cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, as well as dates of recent episodes, if known. 7. The point-of-contact information for the assisted living center or assisted living home, including the telephone number, if available, cell phone number and email address. A point of contact must be available to respond to questions regarding the information provided twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. 8. A copy of the resident's health insurance portability and accountability act (HIPAA) release authorizing a receiving hospital to communicate with the assisted living center or assisted living home to plan for the resident's discharge. This paragraph does not preclude a resident from revoking the resident's health insurance portability and accountability act release authorization. 9. A copy of the resident's advance directives, if any, on file at the assisted living center or assisted living home. This paragraph does not preclude a resident from revoking or modifying the resident's advance directives." 2. A review of R1's and R2's medical records revealed no standardized form which included all information and documentation required by statute. 3. In an interview, E1 reported E1 was not aware that statute required medication list, HIPAA, and Advanced Directive to be combined in advance. E1 acknowledged the facility failed to maintain a standardized form for each resident that included the information prescribed in A.R.S. 36-420.04.A.
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that before or at the time of acceptance of an individual, the individual submitted documentation that was dated within 90 calendar days before the individual was accepted by the assisted living facility and included whether the individual requires continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints and was dated and signed by a physician, registered nurse practitioner, registered nurse, or physician assistant for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs. Findings include: 1. A review of R2's medical records revealed no documentation to indicate whether R2 required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints, dated and signed by a physician, registered nurse practitioner, registered nurse, or physician assistant. 2. In an interview E1 acknowledged the medical record for R2 did not include the required documentation dated within 90 calendar days before the individuals were accepted by the assisted living facility.
Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure poisonous or toxic materials stored by the assisted living facility were maintained in a locked area, labeled and inaccessible to residents. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident. Findings include: 1. A review of Department records revealed the facility was licensed to provide directed care services. 2. During an environmental inspection, Compliance Officer observed ambulatory residents in the home. 3. During the environmental tour, the Compliance Officers observed the following poisonous or toxic material in the backyard of the home accessible to residents: - One can of "Behr Premium Plus Paint & Primer"; - One bottle of "Round-up Weed and Grass Killer"; and - One bottle of "Ortho Home Defense Insect Killer." 4. In an interview, E1 acknowledged poisonous or toxic materials stored by the assisted living facility were not maintained in a locked area, labeled and inaccessible to residents.
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the chief administrative officer failed to implement tuberculosis (TB) infection control activities including baseline screening, for one of two sampled personnel. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents. Findings include: 1. Arizona Administrative Code (A.A.C.) R9-10-113(B)(1)(a)(i) states: "B. A health care institution's chief administrative officer shall: 1. For an individual for whom baseline screening and documentation of freedom from infectious tuberculosis is required by an Article in this Chapter, as specified in subsection (A)(2)(a), obtain one of the following as evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis: a. Documentation of a negative Mantoux skin test or other tuberculosis screening test that: i. Is recommended by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)." 2. A review of the CDC website revealed a web page titled "Baseline Tuberculosis Screening and Testing for Health Care Personnel." The web page stated: "If the Mantoux tuberculin skin test (TST) is used for baseline testing of health care personnel, use two-step testing. Purpose: Two-step testing is recommended for the initial TB skin test for adults who may be tested periodically, such as health care personnel." 3. A review of E2's personnel record revealed completion of one of two steps required for TST testing. However, no documentation of a second step TST test was available for review. 4. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the chief administrative officer failed to implement tuberculosis (TB) infection control activities including baseline screening.
Contact
Get in Touch
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
References & Resources
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
Read reviews from families & visitors
Medicare data downloads
Original nursing home datasets
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.