See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Nursing HomeMedicaid

Splendido at Rancho Vistoso

Limited public data on Splendido at Rancho Vistoso. Call, tour, and ask to meet current residents' families — your own impression matters most.

13500 North Rancho Vistoso Blvd, Tucson, AZ 85755Licensed & Active
Google rating
3.9/5

based on 22 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1

Watch Splendido at Rancho Vistoso

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

Splendido offers an impressive array of amenities and a vibrant social life that is excellent for active seniors. However, families should perform due diligence regarding their skilled nursing policies and ask specifically how they manage transitions in care, as some reviewers have noted issues with patient retention and staffing levels.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

22 reviews analyzed
Splendido is highly regarded for its beautiful, large facilities, excellent amenities like indoor/outdoor pools, and a social atmosphere that makes making friends easy. However, some families have expressed serious concerns regarding the facility's tendency to reject skilled nursing patients and a perceived decline in care quality following administrative changes.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food5.0Staff4.0Clean5.0Activities5.0MedsN/AMemoryN/ACommsN/AValue4.0

Strengths

  • Beautiful and large facilities
  • Excellent amenities including pools and gym
  • Socially active community with easy socialization
  • High-quality dining options
  • Kind and caring staff

Concerns

  • Potential for discharging residents when health needs increase
  • Decline in care quality following administration change

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

234'16(2)'20(1)'22(3)'24(5)'26(1)

Distribution

5
15
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
6

How They Respond to Reviews

41%response rate

This facility responds to some reviews.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1The facility looks absolutely beautiful; could you tell us more about how residents typically enjoy the pool and gym areas?
  • 2We noticed how much you engage with feedback from the community; how does the administration use resident and family input to maintain high standards of care?
  • 3With such a socially active community, what kind of daily group activities or social outings are planned for the residents?
  • 4Could you walk us through the protocol for handling medical emergencies or changes in health needs during the night?
  • 5The dining options look wonderful; how much flexibility is there for residents to customize their meals or follow specific dietary needs?
  • 6As our loved one's medical needs evolve, how does the facility approach transitions in care levels to ensure they can stay here as long as possible?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

I can’t speak to being a resident there, but they are quick to reject patients in their skilled nursing - as they just did with my father. With that in mind, be careful with moving here - their stepped care looks to more about “you can be here as long as all is good, but when you develop more serious issues, we will toss you on the street.”

Skilled nursing family member · 2024☆☆☆☆

I've lived at Splendido for 10+ years and life is awesome! The people here are wonderful, and that includes Management, Staff and Residents. There are unlimited opportunities to socialize, share common interests and hear stories of interesting lives.

Long-term resident · 2021★★★★★

Beautiful place. Great gym. Indoor and outdoor pools. Excellent food in 3 different restaurants. Staff are terrific.

Visitor · 2023★★★★★
Source: 22 Google reviews

Inspection History

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: AZ State Licensing Agency

7total
10deficiencies
May 1, 2025Complaint

The Risk Based complaint survey was conducted on May 1, 2025, for the investigation of complaints #AZ00164244, AZ00157386, AZ00158054, AZ00165058, AZ00163850, AZ00166270, AZ00165666. The following deficiencies were cited:

An administrator shall ensure that: R9-10-410.B.2. A resident is treated with dignity, respect, and consideration;R9-10-410.B.2.Corrected Jun 30, 2025

Violation cited

Mar 25, 2025Complaint
CleanReport

The State compliance survey was conducted 03/25/2025 through 03/28/2025, in conjunction with the investigation of Compliaints .The AZ00219855 following deficiencies were cited:

Mar 24, 2025Other
NFPA 101

Violation cited

NFPA 101

Violation cited

Sep 9, 2024Complaint

An investigation of intake #AZ00215696 and AZ00215612 was conducted on September 9 through September 10, 2024. The following deficiencies were cited:

25(d) Accidents.483.25(d)(1)(2)Corrected Oct 4, 2024

Based on clinical record review, interviews, review of facility policies and the State Agency (SA) complaint tracking system, the facility failed to use a two-person transfer, as identified by the comprehensive care plan, resulting in the resident #1's fall with injury. The deficient practice could result in increased risk of injury to the resident. Findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on February 23, 2022 with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, degenerative disease of nervous system and repeated falls. A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated July 10, 2024 revealed a staff assessment for mental status indicating resident #1 had a memory problem with both short-term memory and long-term memory. It was also assessed that resident #1's cognitive skills for daily decision making to be moderately impaired. The same MDS assessment also indicated resident #1 was entirely dependent on staff for assistance or the assistance of 2 or more helpers required with sit to stand and bed-to-chair transfer. The MDS also revealed the resident was receiving hospice care. A review of the physician's orders revealed the following orders; Hoyer lift for transfers only, which was dated March 22, 2024. A review of a comprehensive care plan revealed a focus on the resident's risks of falls due to his use of psychotropic medications and fall risk score. An intervention was initiated on March 25, 2024 that indicated resident #1 was a two person assist with Hoyer lift with transfers. A review of the facility's assessment titled, "Assessment Criteria for Safe Resident Handling and Movement," dated July 5, 2024 indicated resident #1 was not weight bearing as they did not have any bilateral upper-extremity strength. The same assessment also indicated resident #1 was a 2-person transfer by staff with a full body lift with full sling. A review of the progress notes for resident #1 revealed an entry dated September 2, 2024 that was created by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN/Staff #147). The note revealed that staff #147 was summoned to resident #1's room by another staff member. The note continues to indicate that resident #1 was sitting on the floor with a CNA and that the "CNA stated she slid him down to the floor when trying to transfer to (wheelchair)". The note indicated that staff #147 and three other staff members assisted the resident into the wheelchair and vitals were taken. A review of another progress note for resident #1 which was dated September 3, 2024 and was created by LPN/Staff #53. The note indicated resident #1 was complaining of pain when he moved in bed and during peri-care. At this time, the resident was assessed and it was noted that there was bruising to the lateral right knee with some swelling. The note indicates that a new order for increased morphine and an x-ray was received. A review of the physician's orders revealed an order for an X-ray to the right knee and hip due to increased pain caused by a fall which was date

An administrator shall ensure that:R9-10-425.A.1.b.Corrected Oct 4, 2024

Based on clinical record review, interviews, review of facility policies and the State Agency (SA) complaint tracking system, the facility failed to use a two-person transfer, as identified by the comprehensive care plan, resulting in the resident #1's fall with injury. Findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on February 23, 2022 with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, degenerative disease of nervous system and repeated falls. A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated July 10, 2024 revealed a staff assessment for mental status indicating resident #1 had a memory problem with both short-term memory and long-term memory. It was also assessed that resident #1's cognitive skills for daily decision making to be moderately impaired. The same MDS assessment also indicated resident #1 was entirely dependent on staff for assistance or the assistance of 2 or more helpers required with sit to stand and bed-to-chair transfer. The MDS also revealed the resident was receiving hospice care. A review of the physician's orders revealed the following orders; Hoyer lift for transfers only, which was dated March 22, 2024. A review of a comprehensive care plan revealed a focus on the resident's risks of falls due to his use of psychotropic medications and fall risk score. An intervention was initiated on March 25, 2024 that indicated resident #1 was a two person assist with Hoyer lift with transfers. A review of the facility's assessment titled, "Assessment Criteria for Safe Resident Handling and Movement," dated July 5, 2024 indicated resident #1 was not weight bearing as they did not have any bilateral upper-extremity strength. The same assessment also indicated resident #1 was a 2-person transfer by staff with a full body lift with full sling. A review of the progress notes for resident #1 revealed an entry dated September 2, 2024 that was created by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN/Staff #147). The note revealed that staff #147 was summoned to resident #1's room by another staff member. The note continues to indicate that resident #1 was sitting on the floor with a CNA and that the "CNA stated she slid him down to the floor when trying to transfer to (wheelchair)". The note indicated that staff #147 and three other staff members assisted the resident into the wheelchair and vitals were taken. A review of another progress note for resident #1 which was dated September 3, 2024 and was created by LPN/Staff #53. The note indicated resident #1 was complaining of pain when he moved in bed and during peri-care. At this time, the resident was assessed and it was noted that there was bruising to the lateral right knee with some swelling. The note indicates that a new order for increased morphine and an x-ray was received. A review of the physician's orders revealed an order for an X-ray to the right knee and hip due to increased pain caused by a fall which was dated September 3, 2024. A review of a third progress note for resident #1, dated Sep

Aug 7, 2024Complaint
CleanReport

An onsite complaint survey was conducted on August 7, 2024 for the investigation of intake # AZ00214266, AZ00213926, AZ00213898, AZ00204123. There were no deficiencies cited.

Oct 2, 2023Complaint

The Recertification Survey was conducted October 2, 2023 through October 6, 2023, in conjunction with the investigation of Complaints #AZ00192635 and AZ00187800. The following deficiencies were cited:

An administrator shall ensure that:R9-10-403.C.2.d.Corrected Dec 7, 2023

Based on observation, clinical record, staff interviews and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered as ordered by the physician for 1 resident (#21). Findings include: Resident #21 was admitted on April 26, 2023 with diagnose of personal history of transient ischemic attack, cerebral infarction, and cardiac septal defect. A care plan dated April 14, 2023 included that the resident has Cerebral Vascular Accident and history of transient ischemic attack with an intervention of giving medications as ordered by the physician. A physician's order dated June 24, 2023 included Aspirin Oral Tablet Chewable (Aspirin), Give 81 mg by mouth one time a day for deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis. An observation was conducted on October 19, 2023 at 7:32 AM of a Registered Nurse (RN/staff #32) administering a 81mg enteric coated aspirin to resident #21 An interview was conducted on October 19, 2023 at 10:41 a.m. with the RN (staff #32) who said that she gave him an enteric coated aspirin. She checked the orders and said it should have been a chewable aspirin. She said that was the card that was missing so she just used house supply, but the house supply was enteric coated. An interview conducted on October 20, 2023 at 10:28 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON/staff #44) said that her expectation for provider orders is that they be followed. She said that enteric coated aspirin does not meet the order and that the administration did not meet her expectation. A policy titled 6.0 General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration revised January 1, 2013 revealed that facility staff should verify that the medication name and dose are correct.

An administrator shall ensure that a personnel record is maintained for each personnel member, employee, volunteer, or student that includes:R9-10-406.F.3.c.Corrected Dec 7, 2023

Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a background check was completed prior to an employee working onsite. Findings include: A review of employee personnel files, on October 19th, 2023, indicated staff # 85 did not have a valid fingerprint card. In place of a fingerprint card, a photocopy of staff's previous employment as a security guard was on file. An interview was conducted on October 19th, 2023 at 1:27 PM with Human Resources (Staff #111). Staff #111 stated they were new to the State of Arizona and upon their hire, they did an audit on employee files and found several employees with recently expired fingerprint clearance. HR stated In employee's case, they discovered there was no fingerprint card on file so they requested that staff #85 apply for a fingerprint card. When asked for the copy of the application, it was discovered the application did not have an application number so there was no way for the facility to confirm the status of the application. When asked if the staff #85 is still currently working onsite, HR confirmed they were as of today but they would remove staff #85 immediately until his background check is fully completed. An interview was conducted on October 20th, 2023 AT 8:08 AM with the facility administrator (staff #121) in their office. When asked what their expectation was in regards to background checks for new employees, they stated that a new hire should have a copy of the fingerprint card on file or an application pending prior to working at the facility. Staff #121 stated they had assumed that staff #85's background check was done correctly because they observed a checkmark next to the fingerprint box without looking at the employee personnel file. A review of the policy titled, "Pre-Employment Screening" with an effective date of June 14, 2007, indicated the Human Resources representative will be responsible to ensure the background check form is completed. It also indicates that if any applicant is not able to complete a background check they will not be hired by the company.

45 Pharmacy Services483.45(a)(b)(1)-(3)Corrected Dec 7, 2023

Based on observation, clinical record, staff interviews and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered as ordered by the physician for 1 resident (#21). This practice could result in decreased deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis. Findings include: Resident #21 was admitted on April 26, 2023 with diagnose of personal history of transient ischemic attack, cerebral infarction, and cardiac septal defect. A care plan dated April 14, 2023 included that the resident has Cerebral Vascular Accident and history of transient ischemic attack with an intervention of giving medications as ordered by the physician. A physician's order dated June 24, 2023 included Aspirin Oral Tablet Chewable (Aspirin), Give 81 mg by mouth one time a day for deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis. An observation was conducted on October 19, 2023 at 7:32 AM of a Registered Nurse (RN/staff #32) administering a 81mg enteric coated aspirin to resident #21 An interview was conducted on October 19, 2023 at 10:41 a.m. with the RN (staff #32) who said that she gave him an enteric coated aspirin. She checked the orders and said it should have been a chewable aspirin. She said that was the card that was missing so she just used house supply, but the house supply was enteric coated. An interview conducted on October 20, 2023 at 10:28 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON/staff #44) said that her expectation for provider orders is that they be followed. She said that enteric coated aspirin does not meet the order and that the administration did not meet her expectation. A policy titled 6.0 General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration revised January 1, 2013 revealed that facility staff should verify that the medication name and dose are correct.

60(i) Food safety requirements.483.60(i)(1)(2)Corrected Dec 7, 2023

Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that cleaning clothes were stored in accordance with professional standards and that a beard nets were worn by two staff member. The deficient practice could result in placing residents at risk for food-borne illnesses. Findings include: A kitchen observation was conducted on October 17, 2023 at 8:40 AM. The observation revealed a dry cleaning rag on the top shelf of the central food preparation area adjacent to the plating area. Two additional rags were observed on a shelf above the sink in the main kitchen area, directly on top of a sealed bag of pita pocket bread. The executive chef took pictures of each identified rag and its placement. An interview was conducted immediately thereafter with the executive chef, staff #110, who stated that the expectation was the cleaning rags are to be stored underneath the counters and not on food preparation or storage areas. He stated that the risk could include a potential for infection or foodborne illness. A kitchen observation was conducted on October 17, 2023 at 8:50 AM. Staff #90, cook and executive chef, staff #110, were both observed without a beard net in the kitchen area. Staff #110 had approximately 2 centimeters of facial hair present; whereas staff #90 had a full-grown beard approximately 6 centimeters in length. Both staff members were observed in the kitchen and neither had a beard net in place at the time. An interview was conducted on October 17, 2023 at 8:55 AM, with staff #110, executive chef. Staff #110 stated he understood that staff #90 should have been wearing a beard net; however, he stated that he was under the impression that he (staff #110) did not require a beard net because his beard was relatively short. He stated that he understood that the risk still existed for hair to fall into the food regardless of the length of the beard. A kitchen observation was conducted on October 18, 2023 at 10:47 AM. A stained cleaning rag was observed on the food preparation counter. The rag was observed for approximately 5 minutes while staff continued to walk past it. No one removed it. When the sous chef, staff #31 was asked about the cleaning rag, she stated that the rag should not be there and removed it. She stated it was left there earlier when she was transferring a hot tray. An interview was conducted on October 19, 2023 with server, staff #67, who stated that the expectation is that hair nets and beard nets are to be worn anytime that staff are in the kitchen. An interview was conducted on October 19, 2023 at 12:30 PM, with both the executive chef, staff #110 and sous chef, staff #31. Both stated that the expectation is that beard nets are worn when facial hair is present and that cleaning rags, either dry or wet, not be stored on food preparation or storage surfaces. An interview was conducted on October 19, 2023 at 12:42 PM, with the administrator, staff #121. Staff #121 stated that the expectatio

Oct 2, 2023Other

42 CFR483.41 (a) Nursing Home The facility must meet the applicable provisions of the 2012 Edition of the Life Safety Code of the National Fire Protection Association. This is a recertification survey for Medicare under LSC 2012, Chapter 19 existing nursing home. The entire facility was surveyed on October 25, 2023. The facility meets the standards, based upon compliance with all provisions of the standards No apparent deficiencies were found during the survey.

403.748(d)(2), 416.54(d)(2), 418.113(d)(2), 441.184(d)(2), 482.15(d)(2), 483.475Corrected Dec 18, 2023

Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to participate in a community based exercise in 2022-2023. Failure to provide policy and procedures for the training and testing program may lead to untrained staff in an emergency situation and may result in harm to the residents during an emergency. Findings include: Based on record review and staff interview on October 25, 2023, revealed the facility failed to provide documentation of participation of the following; 1. Participate in a full-scale exercise (FSE) that is community-based. 2. Conduct an additional exercise that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second FSE that is individual, facility-based. (B) A tabletop exercise. During the exit conference on October 25, 2023, the above finding was again acknowledge by the management team.

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call